Yeah, but think about Xeons...know any gamers with Xeon CPUs (see my previous comment)?
Forgive me if I'm recycling others' opinions/conclusions, but I thought Xeons, being Intel, sucked at games only slightly less than P4's compared with K8's. I also thought that the fact that I've seen Xeons included in only a handful of gaming benchmarks over the past 12 months was testament to the fact that noone took them seriously.
The diff is Opty has gone into desktop CPU market for different reasons - servers want stability and low power consumption. Desky consumers love it for low heat and XLent OCing capability, as well as the fact that it owns P4s of whatever flavour ATM.
My point was that if AMD, with it's
limited manufacturing capacity, can flog an Opty 146 or 165 or whatever to the server market unencumbered by desktop CPU pricing demands, they'll probably make more money. Now that manufacturing capacity, not market share, is the limiting factor in how many chips they sell, they pretty much do what they like (market theory: Demand > Supply means price goes up).
That said rumours do fly thick and fast 'round here. I'm just saying, IMO, it would make sense.
Edit: damn [/u] hanging round