Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
Hi
for you is possible to use a Voip softphone with a
640Kbps DSL connection but with a low pint and fast modality?
Which is for you the minimum required as DSL connection and
which is the bandwith taken if we speak to the phone together
(the caller and the called) ?
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
"gmail" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:KmTfd.29021$1q2.5555@tornado.fastwebnet.it...
> Hi
>
> for you is possible to use a Voip softphone with a
> 640Kbps DSL connection but with a low pint and fast modality?
>
> Which is for you the minimum required as DSL connection and
> which is the bandwith taken if we speak to the phone together
> (the caller and the called) ?
>
> thank you for the support
>
>
Why not test it with a friend? My cable connection just tested at 641K, it
works fine. I have friends who use softphones at dialup speed. at least you
will know what is "possible".
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
gmail wrote:
> Hi
> for you is possible to use a Voip softphone with a
> 640Kbps DSL connection but with a low pint and fast modality?
> Which is for you the minimum required as DSL connection and
> which is the bandwith taken if we speak to the phone together
> (the caller and the called) ?
> thank you for the support
Depending on compression used, it is possible to have an (arguably) decent
quality call utilizing only 8Kbit/sec, so you should do just fine with
your DSL provided by you do not download Win XP SP2 at the same time.
Thanks, Microsoft for a 75MByte patch!
##-----------------------------------------------##
Article posted with Cabling-Design.com Newsgroup Archive
http://www.cabling-design.com/forums no-spam read and post WWW interface to your favorite newsgroup -
comp.dcom.voice-over-ip - 924 messages and counting!
##-----------------------------------------------##
>
>Which is for you the minimum required as DSL connection and
>which is the bandwith taken if we speak to the phone together
>(the caller and the called) ?
>
>thank you for the support
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.