_
"Mohmmedirfan" <Mohmmedirfan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:342DDBE0-1B0E-4EAD-A5A7-0BB37D25B862@microsoft.com...
> windows 98 SE the Seagate sata HDD ?
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)
Hmmm... Good question. I don't know the answer.
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
"jkb" <nospam> wrote in message
news:elSg1kMqFHA.3424@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> This is the most indecipherable thread I've seen in a long time. Since
>> you
>> seem to understand OP's query, care to translate?
>
> I think that he wants to know whether Win98 supports a Seagate SATA hard
> drive. Sounds like it.
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)
"Gary S. Terhune" <grystnews@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:exLvDDNqFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hmmm... Good question. I don't know the answer.
>
He'll need to download the updated FDISK from Microsoft.
Otherwise, he should be fine with Windows 95 and above.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)
OK, that addresses the size issue, (and in any case, 3rd-party partitioning
apps would work fine, also.) But I don't know what drivers SATA needs, and
I'd assume that they aren't included in the original installation files. So
the question is what drivers does 98 use for SATA drives, and are they
universally provided in 9x-compatible versions?
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
"Hugh Candlin" <No@MeansNo.Com> wrote in message
news:u5dm7JNqFHA.820@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
> "Gary S. Terhune" <grystnews@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:exLvDDNqFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> Hmmm... Good question. I don't know the answer.
>>
>
> He'll need to download the updated FDISK from Microsoft.
> Otherwise, he should be fine with Windows 95 and above.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/defau [...] -us;263044 >
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)
"Gary S. Terhune" <grystnews@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:%233AYPSNqFHA.2776@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> OK, that addresses the size issue, (and in any case, 3rd-party
partitioning
> apps would work fine, also.) But I don't know what drivers SATA needs, and
> I'd assume that they aren't included in the original installation files.
So
> the question is what drivers does 98 use for SATA drives, and are they
> universally provided in 9x-compatible versions?
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)
OK, sounds like the OP's question has been answered--assuming that was the
original question, <s>.
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
"Hugh Candlin" <No@MeansNo.Com> wrote in message
news:%23zKVLaNqFHA.616@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
> "Gary S. Terhune" <grystnews@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:%233AYPSNqFHA.2776@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> OK, that addresses the size issue, (and in any case, 3rd-party
> partitioning
>> apps would work fine, also.) But I don't know what drivers SATA needs,
>> and
>> I'd assume that they aren't included in the original installation files.
> So
>> the question is what drivers does 98 use for SATA drives, and are they
>> universally provided in 9x-compatible versions?
>
> Seagate calls it DiscWizard Suite.
>
> http://www.seagate.com/support/dis [...] scwiz.html >
> You need DiscWizard 2003 or later
> when installing a Serial ATA disc drive.
>
> Older versions of DiscWizard
> do not recognize Serial ATA model numbers.
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)
"Hugh Candlin" <No@MeansNo.Com> wrote in message
news:%23zKVLaNqFHA.616@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
> "Gary S. Terhune" <grystnews@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:%233AYPSNqFHA.2776@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> OK, that addresses the size issue, (and in any case, 3rd-party partitioning
>> apps would work fine, also.) But I don't know what drivers SATA needs, and
>> I'd assume that they aren't included in the original installation files. So
>> the question is what drivers does 98 use for SATA drives, and are they
>> universally provided in 9x-compatible versions?
YMMV, depending on the BIOS, but 9x shouldn't need drivers to access
a SATA drive, it just won't load it as a PCI device, and instead will
see it as an ISA device needing a dedicated IRQ (a "P"-ATA device).
I can access my SATA drives fine from DOS floppy boot with no drivers
loaded.
FWIU, a SATA supporting BIOS starts out by emulating the drive as a
"legacy" (parallel) ATA device. It then sets a flag, (in some obscure BIOS table)
to signal that the device can be switched over to SATA's "native" mode. The IRQs
can then be freed to be used by other devices. It's up to the OS, if it
understnads (> XP-SP1, Server 2003). If the OS doesn't get it (9x for one),
then the drive will simply be accessed using legacy mode.
In legacy/compatibility mode, you still get the throughput of SATA, but
you have to use the IRQs, and so are limited to 4 drives (assuming a
typical setup), due to IRQ sharing. Another loss would be hot-swapping
if supported.
If using a controller card, I'm not too sure on that; but I suspect it's
the same logic, at least concerning the mode switch. The card is just
extending the BIOS to add SATA hardware capability. It's still up to the OS.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.