Under W98, what is the fastest processor permitted?

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

Under W98, what is the fastest processor permitted?

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

But there is a limit. I read it in a newsgroup post.
______________________________________________
"jkb" wrote:

> > Under W98, what is the fastest processor permitted?
>
> Probably there isn't a limit. I'm running a Intel Celeron D
> 2.4GHz(overclocked to 2.8GHz, even run it at 3.0GHz - but that's the chip
> limit). Only have a Celeron D because I couldn't afford any better.
>
>
>

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

> It probably varies in reality, but the nominal figure I've seen is 2.1
GHz.
> I'd assume you *might* have problems with processors that are somewhat
> slower, and you *probably* will have problems with faster processors.

But then how coome my 2.8GHz is working fine? Or does my Win98SE make a
difference?

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

I don't know. I only know what I've seen. As I said, I'm certain the effect
varies significantly depending on mobo and processor. It's being SE *might*
have some effect, but I can't say what that would be.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User

"jkb" <nospam> wrote in message newsnA6LuzqFHA.908@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> It probably varies in reality, but the nominal figure I've seen is 2.1
> GHz.
>> I'd assume you *might* have problems with processors that are somewhat
>> slower, and you *probably* will have problems with faster processors.
>
> But then how coome my 2.8GHz is working fine? Or does my Win98SE make a
> difference?
>
>

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

"b11_" <b11@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
newsA66EEF6-B9C3-48CF-A5A4-C47FC31B3267@microsoft.com...

> > > Under W98, what is the fastest processor permitted?

> "jkb" wrote:> >

> > Probably there isn't a limit.

> But there is a limit. I read it in a newsgroup post.

Oh well, if you read it in a NG it must be true . . .

--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion (More info?)

2.1 GHz for Windows ***98***. due to a timing problem with ndis.vxd on its
operating system. Its visible at first boot attempt after installation if
the processor is too fast. Ron noted a link with a fix

98SE and ME ***DONT'** have this problem. Using either version of nids.vxd
on 98 works.

"b11_" <b11@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F8163F9A-C5F7-4C50-9401-5064FB4210E1@microsoft.com...
> Under W98, what is the fastest processor permitted?