Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
Have people got the Cisco 186 to work properly when sending faxes? My
current Grandstream 486 gives poor transmission speed and keeps
disconnecting. The relevant current codec is G.711. There is to be a
codec T.38 for fax but the 186 does not yet support it, although its
competitor does; can we expect Cisco to support T.38 in firmware at a
later point?
Is the ATA 186 reasonably current or is it going to be superseded
soon, having been on the market two years? Is there a Web board
particularly including Cisco VOIP questions?
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
<maxi@falkirkreserve-nospam.com> wrote in message
news:11n4p01btht1idj5p5bbspehhe692tvs67@4ax.com...
> Have people got the Cisco 186 to work properly when sending faxes? My
> current Grandstream 486 gives poor transmission speed and keeps
> disconnecting. The relevant current codec is G.711. There is to be a
> codec T.38 for fax but the 186 does not yet support it, although its
> competitor does; can we expect Cisco to support T.38 in firmware at a
> later point?
>
Hi I dont use mine for outgoing fax but do for incoming. It seems to work OK
I have recived 14400 faxes OK. I use Hylafax which I did have to adjust to
be very tollaent of errors etc.
Ian
> Is the ATA 186 reasonably current or is it going to be superseded
> soon, having been on the market two years? Is there a Web board
> particularly including Cisco VOIP questions?
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:07:16 -0000, "Ian" <nospam@bathfordhill.co.uk>
wrote:
>
><maxi@falkirkreserve-nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:11n4p01btht1idj5p5bbspehhe692tvs67@4ax.com...
>> Have people got the Cisco 186 to work properly when sending faxes? My
>> current Grandstream 486 gives poor transmission speed and keeps
>> disconnecting. The relevant current codec is G.711. There is to be a
>> codec T.38 for fax but the 186 does not yet support it, although its
>> competitor does; can we expect Cisco to support T.38 in firmware at a
>> later point?
>>
>Hi I dont use mine for outgoing fax but do for incoming. It seems to work OK
>I have recived 14400 faxes OK. I use Hylafax which I did have to adjust to
>be very tollaent of errors etc.
>
>Ian
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
<maxi@falkirkreserve-nospam.com> wrote in message
newsl8hp0pqnom29vfo1g11mtkd03g9phvurv@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:07:16 -0000, "Ian" <nospam@bathfordhill.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >
> ><maxi@falkirkreserve-nospam.com> wrote in message
> >news:11n4p01btht1idj5p5bbspehhe692tvs67@4ax.com...
> >> Have people got the Cisco 186 to work properly when sending faxes? My
> >> current Grandstream 486 gives poor transmission speed and keeps
> >> disconnecting. The relevant current codec is G.711. There is to be a
> >> codec T.38 for fax but the 186 does not yet support it, although its
> >> competitor does; can we expect Cisco to support T.38 in firmware at a
> >> later point?
> >>
> >Hi I dont use mine for outgoing fax but do for incoming. It seems to work
OK
> >I have recived 14400 faxes OK. I use Hylafax which I did have to adjust
to
> >be very tollaent of errors etc.
> >
> >Ian
>
> What VOIP provider do you use?
A few
VOIPTALK for mobiles, FWD for FWD calls and another for sip incomming who I
cant remeber teh supplier, all terminating on an * server
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:47:12 -0000, "Ian" <nospam@bathfordhill.co.uk>
wrote:
>
><maxi@falkirkreserve-nospam.com> wrote in message
>newsl8hp0pqnom29vfo1g11mtkd03g9phvurv@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:07:16 -0000, "Ian" <nospam@bathfordhill.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><maxi@falkirkreserve-nospam.com> wrote in message
>> >news:11n4p01btht1idj5p5bbspehhe692tvs67@4ax.com...
>> >> Have people got the Cisco 186 to work properly when sending faxes? My
>> >> current Grandstream 486 gives poor transmission speed and keeps
>> >> disconnecting. The relevant current codec is G.711. There is to be a
>> >> codec T.38 for fax but the 186 does not yet support it, although its
>> >> competitor does; can we expect Cisco to support T.38 in firmware at a
>> >> later point?
>> >>
>> >Hi I dont use mine for outgoing fax but do for incoming. It seems to work
>OK
>> >I have recived 14400 faxes OK. I use Hylafax which I did have to adjust
>to
>> >be very tollaent of errors etc.
>> >
>> >Ian
>>
>> What VOIP provider do you use?
>
>A few
>
>VOIPTALK for mobiles, FWD for FWD calls and another for sip incomming who I
>cant remeber teh supplier, all terminating on an * server
>
>Ian
>
i use VOIPTALK for faxes and it's not good for that, although it may
be a problem with my Grandstream unit in particular.
Can you tell me which supplier u have for PSTN fax send/receive? I
would be interested.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.