I checked the updated CPU charts and it looks like the pentium D is beating the 4200+ by a bit in most of the charts.
The prices are both roughly the same, it's just a performance issue. Which processor should I get? I usually leave my PC on for hours on end, if I got the pentium D and OC'ed it would I have to worry about overheating?
I just checked the charts..... and from what I saw.... the 4200 and the 950 were pretty much neck and neck..... didn't really matter which one won..... it only won by a very very small margins.... a couple of seconds or so. The only other thing you need to consider is the 950 already has a TDP of 130W.... The 4200 is probably about half that. Other than that take pricing into account. They are pretty much tied up though. The only benchmarks I really saw the 950 walking away with were the synthetic benchmarks..... and they really don't mean anything.
yeah it would be hotter, but not as bad as the 8XX D series.... if it were me, I would go with the X2, if you wait a few more months.... Conroe will be out.... but if I bought them today, I would go with X2.
the charts are good gudelines but in real life systems vary.
it all depends on what your needs are.
if your gaming Amd has been a great performer.
if your into video intel keeps pace.
the intel clocks like crazy .but you need to take care of that heat.
I never tried to oc the 4400 but had a little luck with the 3800 X2.
as you can see I just like the intel.
Another thing you may want to consider is if you'd want to upgrade in a few more months. Going with an intel LGA775 platform motherboard that will support Conroe when it comes out would be a plus for the D950 Intel platform. So far, I only know of the Intel 975XBX revision 304 motherboard being able to support Conroe, but there may be others. The thermal load of the D950 would be enough to turn me off, although the latest releases of the D series have EIST and other stepping features to reduce energy usage and heat.
When it comes to encoding video and what not, the AMD dual core cpu's win that battle over a 9XX series. I guess if you OC both CPU's to the max, the OC head room of the 9XX series might put it ahead, not sure by how big of a margin though. I have owned two dual core AMD cpu's.... opteron 165 and an X2 3800.... the 3800 went from 2.0 to 2.65 stable and the Opteron scales to about 2.7 stable. I could only compare these CPU's to an 8XX series clocked at 3.7GHZ and these two smoked. My 3800 got the same encode time at stock as the 8XX did @ 3.7GHZ.... but the 9XX series are better than the 8XX series.... so I can definately say, don't touch the 8XX's with a 10 foot pole.
If you want a Conroe and are willing to wait a couple of months, do some research, and buy a compatable with Conroe 975 board and some high end Corsair DDR2 and a low cost 920 now for $210, and when Conroe hits retail markets, slap in a $500 2.67GHz and overclock it!
This will also give you time to acquaint yourself with overclocking the 775 chips on DDR2, which takes some getting used to so you can make your mistakes on a practice chip, then resale it when you get experienced and have a Conroe in place of it.
are there actually boards out right now that are compatable with Conroe? I have heard conflicting stories on this, which is why I ask.... if so.... could you post some links.... I was told the 975X BX was, but don't see Conroe on the list.... just curious.... and also, we might be best served to wait for boards that are better designed for Conroe's difference in volatage.... but that is just past experience speaking with unstable boards..... so might not be the case this time.
Actually its pretty much a tie, but when the need arises the 950 will "out-OC" the 4200 by a nice margin.
At this point its the only logical choice to go with the D975XBX rev.304 + some CPU even you are gaming a lot.
As I asked already.... doesn't conroe require a new VRM.... meaning it will not work on current mobos? are there certain revision it will work on? With the 950 getting a little bit higher % overclock it would probably edge out the X2 4200 overclocked.... not by a a large margin though, jsut keep in mind, you should be looking at the percentage OC not total Ghz, because if they were to OC the same %, you could assume the performance will be roughly the same as far as which one wins certain benchies and by how much. The 950 is already starting with a 1.4 Ghz advantage over the 4200, so the 950 overclocking a Ghz, and the 4200 overclocking 4-600Mhz would keep them pretty close. But the higher % OC of the 950 would probably make it win most if not all the benchies, but not by a huge margin. Also, keep in mind, the 950 already has a TDP of 130w..... you can increase that quite a bit with a hefty OC..... and need to have an effective cooling solution. But the 950 would probably win most if not all benchmarks between the two chips if both were OC'ed to max stable.
Pricewatch has a 950 at $325 versus $357 for the 4200+, mind you the Motherboard for the Intel is likely a few more $$, so ya, pretty close $ wise.
Really depends on application which is best.
If you compile code or play games the AMD chip will likely be a better choice.
If you do video compression or other multi-media applications, the Intel will win by a bit.
The 65 nano Intel chips do have a ton of frequency headroom, so if you plan to overclock the thing, the Intel has a good lead as well.
~~if~~ you can track down a 975 chipset motherboard, you can use the same board for Conroe (maybe) which might also be a factor in favor of the 940 chip, but check that our really carefully before you buy.
If your doing basic office applications both are so fast it doesn't matter.
No doubt Kinda gay they still shipping out the B1. And I bought one from newegg, though its the C1 stepping but when I plug it in, its the B1 stepping and now I am mad
If you want a Conroe and are willing to wait a couple of months, do some research, and buy a compatable with Conroe 975 board and some high end Corsair DDR2 and a low cost 920 now for $210, and when Conroe hits retail markets, slap in a $500 2.67GHz and overclock it!
This will also give you time to acquaint yourself with overclocking the 775 chips on DDR2, which takes some getting used to so you can make your mistakes on a practice chip, then resale it when you get experienced and have a Conroe in place of it.
originally I purchaced this setup with conroe in mind(dream on).for the reasons richPLS listed above.
getting use to the overclocking of the 775chips.
the 920 shares the D955 extreme multiplier and runs 3.73 all day on air .
Ram is the touchy part .
This processor runs cool. So for the cost ?
not a bad suggestion
With the 4200+ you will need to adjust the Vcore more often while with the 950 you might be able to just go all the way up to the coolers limit without touching the Vcore at all so in the end there shouldnt be much of a difference I guess (never compared both CPUs OCed so Im just guessing).
However, the 950 still clearly wins because the platform it uses is Conroe-ready.
This is chip-dependant: I got a X2 3800+ at 2400MHz (+400 MHz) without touching the voltage, and it compiled me a linux kernel in a flash without mistake.
Further tests will include compiling the latest GCC suite, and converting a DVD to xvid. Once I get it past this hurdle, I'll declare it stable, and push it further.
I think most of them will hit 2.4 without a hitch..... but even rasing the vcore.... most of the new ones run under 70W..... 3800, 4200, and 4400..... so they won't really increase that much. And keep in mind.... just because you don't raise the voltage, doesn't mean wattage won't increase..... even the 4800 is 89W or lower....
You are full of crap. the 950 runs very cool. 65nm process and newer stepping made this chip quite cool. I checked it out at bestbuy and costco. the compters has been on all day and its very cool. They ran game simulation on them and absolutely no heat. Go to newegg and read the reviews. Enough of this crap about intel is a heater! Yes, the 90nm is a heater, not the 65nm.
First of all, don't come on here attacking me..... there was a better way you could have started out your statement. Second of all, I was referring to the B1, the C1 is much cooler. Third.... I was also refering to an overclocked 950..... if I remember correctly. And yes, if you do OC them, they do get very hot and consume alot of energy in comparison to an AMD counterpart.... or any AMD cpu for that matter.
I'm assuming the pentium D would run hotter than the AMD X2?
thats not a problem. thats why theres water cooling. my 805 stays under 45*C while dual priming, with my gigabyte water cooling system its also running at 3.4 stock voltage.
49ers, sounds like you probably know the answer to this..... can I OC a 920 to mid 4ghz.... say 4.5.... on an SI-120? Thermalright I think is who makes it. I know the C1's are cooler running, but will I be able to OC the hell out of it like I would do with the CCBBE Opty if I were to buy it. Problem here is, I am either going to get the 920 and OC it to as high as I can, but I have been spoiled with AMD cpu's and have never needed water cooling, don't want to use it either. So, if I can get the 920, and if I can hit 4.5 Ghz on air and have it be faster than the Opty would be @ 2.8-3.1Ghz, then I will go that way for Conroe upgrade in the future..... any thoughts?
The two chips are indeed very close in the benchmarks. The AMD chip will run cooler and quieter for the following reasons:
1. It can reduce its frequency from 2.2 to 2.0, 1.8 and 1.0 GHz at varying states of load. The Pentium D 950 can only do 3.4 to 3.2, 3.0, and 2.8 with no very low multiplier like the 4200+ does.
2. The PD 950 has a 75% load TDP of 95W. The X2 4200+ has a 100% load TDP of 89W.
3. Intel stock fans are louder than AMD units are- that's my observations. One thing I am certain of and can prove is that Intel HSFs run much faster- 3000-4000 rpm while my X2's fan is 1800rpm. RPM == noise.
Also, AMD boards are much less expensive than the 975 "Bad Axe" Intel board. That thing is $300 or more, while my ABIT board was $110. DDR2-800 for Conroe is about $125-150/GB while DDR400 is $70/GB or so. The PD 950 "Conroe-ready" rig would be several hundred more expensive than the X2 4200+ setup.
What I would recommend that you decide on is when you plan to upgrade again. If you're like me, you upgrade in a few years and get a CPU that is several generations newer. That means a new board and RAM will be in order, so I buy the CPU, board, and RAM for today because I'll need to replace it all anyway when I do upgrade. In that case, DDR2-667 on a 945/955 LGA775 board with that PD 950 would be much more comparable in price to a 939 4200+ setup. So my suggestion to you is to either wait for Intel to ship the Core 2 (which is probably what you really want, by your posts) or you buy a rig with today's parts for today and ignore any future compatibility issues.
Wait for the Conroe, it's only a couple of months away. It will run much cooler than the AMD and you will be able to overclock like crazy. You will be able to afford the Conroe.
49'ers, are there any mobo's that support Conroe now? I know many people have speculated.... but are there any that do for sure? And if there are, is it a hit or miss type thing, as in I can order the board.... but might not get the correct revision?
Edit.... the reason I ask about the mobo's, is because I am selling my system to my friend, and don't really feel like using a single core system , but I am not willing to buy anything that will not support next gen.... I have a spare Venice 3000, and 939 board.... just would rather sell it also.... rather than transplant it into my current main case..... althought.... it is 2.8Ghz stable... that is why I am basically asking if I can get a mobo that will support Conroe and just buy a cheap 920 to wait Conroe out with.... and hopefully hit 4.5 on air.... if that is even possible with a good 120 mm cooler.
The mobo might be 479 or 775 and the chipset have not been determine yet. Speculation is 775 with 945 and 975 chipset. I'm just waiting all together so I don't waste my money buying the wrong mobo.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.