Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (
More info?)
Hi Gregory,
Good spiel, mate - seems to gel reasonably well with what everyone has
expressed so far here.
Regards,
John Ward
"Gregory" <flightsim.maps@bkwds.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:tnrff1hgpr0qihimgpdpp6ccbgkjo2m3fq@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:53:46 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
> <dhenriques@noware .net> brought the following to our attention:
>
>>Keep in mind that the troll isn't the main problem. It's the long string
>>of
>>answers to the troll's post that's the real problem. More than one fine
>>newsgroup has been absolutely destroyed by well meaning people who just
>>can't resist the temptation to get their two cents in and see their name
>>up
>>there in that long line of dissenters telling off a troll.
>>When this happens, the troll simply advises his peers that a new group has
>>been found where responses can be counted.
>>Never forget. The single purpose of a troll post is to illicit that long
>>line of responses. Then the responses are counted. The troll who gets the
>>most responses gets his "reputation" enhanced a little. Every post made to
>>a
>>troll helps that troll and takes a newsgroup one step closer to losing the
>>troll wars.
>>Just something for the group to think about.
>>This last couple of threads with these two idiots bragging about stealing
>>software are a perfect example of threads that can lose you the newsgroup.
>>The answer is simple.
>>When you see a post that obviously has been written in such a way that it
>>violates, and is negative to the very purpose of a specific newsgroup; if
>>you answer that post, the poster is smarter than you are and has won the
>>Usenet trophy of the day. It's THAT simple folks! It's YOUR newsgroup.
>>Don't
>>lose it!
>>Dudley Henriques
>>
>>"Quilljar" <wykehill-flightsim@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:dd7hg4$sbs$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>>> If you have just joined this newsgroup, welcome from the old hands. I
>>> would like to assure you that the recent spate of arguments regarding
>>> honesty etc which turned a bit nasty, is quite untypical of this group.
>>> Just wait a day or so and the trolls will disappear and we will continue
>>> with being as helpful about FS200/2/3/4 as we can be. Even FS98 if you
>>> are
>>> still running it
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers
>>> Quilly
>>>
>>>
>>> Try 'Living With Technology' magazine
>>>
http://www.livtech.co.uk
>>>
>>
>
>
> Here's my speel on trollism!!
>
>
>
>
> Trollish Activity
>
>
> by Gregory
>
> August 27, 2002
>
>
> Trollish activity can take on many forms. There can be trollish posts
> and trollish replies. Generally a troll will disrupt activities in a
> forum either intentionally or even while not being aware of it. Trolls
> often roam Usenet groups and plant topics which are certain to cause
> a disturbance.
>
> The sure sign of a troll in action is if a big `stink' is raised when
> the situation could much better be handled off the `main line' using
> messenging for instance. Trollish activity is usually rampant in the
> lower strata of Internet discussion groups where members compete
> for moderator status.. and `kicking' activity is commonplace.
>
>
> Effects of Trollish Activity
>
> Trollish activity can have a highly negative effect in an online
> community. Trolls can wreak havoc causing disputes and drive members
> away who would otherwise post quality material. Trolls often have
> little of value to contribute and gain attention by disruption.
> Generally speaking.. trolls disrupt an online forum in various ways..
> making it too annoying for individuals to post additional topics.
>
>
> Trollish Posts
>
> A trollish post is one which has the effect of causing a heated
> dispute between active members of a forum. An example of a trollish
> post would be the following: `when is MS going to release a patch for
> MSFS?'.
>
>
> Trollish Replies
>
> A trollish reply is one which directly or indirectly starts an
> argument or dispute to a legitimate or on-topic post. Another example
> is a reply which will disrupt a post such that no further discussion
> can take place on that subject. Trolls often disrupt posts in this
> way.
>
>
> General Troll Policy
>
> The common policy for trolls in most communities is `DO NOT FEED
> THE TROLLS'. An ignored troll will often go away since the attention
> which they seek is not forthcoming. If trolls become sufficiently
> annoying.. many discussion forums and user-clients have `filters'
> or blocks on a user or topic basis.
>
>
> Summary
>
> Trolls can be very disruptive. It is up to the moderators to set and
> enforce policies on trollish activity. Users have filter capability
> which will limit the impact of trolls. The best way to handle
> trollishness is to simple not reply. This.. in addition to filters and
> a clear forum policy.. can control or eliminate the problem that is
> TROLL.
>
>
> * * * * *
>
>
> Note: sender acknowleges this post itself may be trollish in nature.
> Comments or revisions to description and content on trollism are
> welcome.. post subject to change.
>
>