Post your super pi score

I got the following scores.... At 1M

P4 560 3.6Ghz = 36sec
Pentium D 3.2Ghz = 41sec
Pentium D Oc'ed @ 4.65Ghz = 44sec (throttling)
Pentium D Oc'ed @ 3.93Ghz = 33sec

Feel free to comment or post your scores :)
56 answers Last reply
More about post super score
  1. P4 2.8c @ 3.5 = 40 sec at 1M
  2. I have a Opteron 175 overclocked to 2.65GHz and got 32.36 seconds using superpi mod 1.4. BTW, SPi 1.4 is not multi-threaded and only uses one core.
    Normaly run this chip at 11x235.8 = 2594MHz and under load tops out at 39C
  3. $hit Happen$
  4. AMD 2.0 ghz 3800+X2 No Overclock 44 sec.
  5. if you slapped some better cooling on that thing you might be able to make a stable 4.6Ghz overclock :)
  6. Ya, currently using Scythe Ninja... not too bad...

    Currently OC'ed at 3.93Ghz and still maintain voltage of 1.28-1.32v
  7. 'rig as in sig, mod1.5 XS : 30.547s
  8. I got about 01m 10. 969s On the Overclocked rig i got below. Lols pretty Impressive speeds eh. and they're only running on everything that's been listed below. Had to jump the PCI latency up to 35 just to get the graphic card to work correctly.
  9. I got 37s on my Athlon 64 3500 @ 2.3ghz.

    39s on my P4 prescott oced to 3.41ghz.
  10. Lols, Did you ever realise that 3500+ is almost 3 generations beyond what i'm showing my clocks at. Lolls don't even let me tell you how ur 2 processers are supperior to mine. But in the end you have to realise that the AMD Athlon XP 1700+ "Throughbred A" at 1.8Ghz gives you pretty impressive scores. Considering that the 1500+ to 2200+ were only suppoed to be out to be in direct competition of the first ever Pentium 4s lols, in which most pentium 3 1.4Ghz coulda easly trump
  11. 35 sec. with setup in sig.

    33 sec when i had it @3960 :)

    Not bad for a CPU that cost me $158(Canadian) a year ago. :lol:
  12. p4 prescott: 42.515
  13. 37 sec when i had it at 3.4 (can't be bothered to update sig cos it started getting unstable (it was stable before...))

    Ara
  14. Quote:
    Lols, Did you ever realise that 3500+ is almost 3 generations beyond what i'm showing my clocks at. Lolls don't even let me tell you how ur 2 processers are supperior to mine. But in the end you have to realise that the AMD Athlon XP 1700+ "Throughbred A" at 1.8Ghz gives you pretty impressive scores. Considering that the 1500+ to 2200+ were only suppoed to be out to be in direct competition of the first ever Pentium 4s lols, in which most pentium 3 1.4Ghz coulda easly trump


    Sorry if you thought I was replying directly to your score to belittle you? I just wanted to add my scores and hit the nearest reply button which happened to be by your name. You could have bought a socket A 2700+ for like 50 bucks about 6 months or so ago, probably would have been a worthwhile venture.
  15. First ever sub 15 second SuperPi_1M has just been posted!

    3.3GHz Core 2 Duo (MEROM): 14.984 seconds

    http://222.151.144.54/c-board/file/14.984s_T7400ES_3376.4.png
  16. Obviously not your score, read the thread title next time.
  17. 29s rig in sig
  18. Quote:
    Obviously not your score, read the thread title next time.

    Obviously no need to be a jerk about it.

    I read the title and then the rest of the thread where it had already diverged off topic. Plus it is very interesting info and relatively on topic so I figured what the hell.

    Of all the crap posted on this forum, you picked that post to complain about? hehe.

    Back on Topic, two of my rigs:

    A64 3200+ @ 2.93GHz, Mushkin PC3500: 32.014 seconds

    P4 3.4E @ 3.8GHz, Micron PC3200: 34 seconds
  19. AMD Athlon X2 4200+ @ stock

    NOTE: I am using the Linux version, so my times might be a little different than yours.

    MU_Engineer@manchester:~/Programs$ ./super_pi 20
    Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
    Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
    f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
    pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
    compilation.
    ------ Started super_pi run : Thu May 11 14:27:41 CDT 2006
    Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
    End of initialization. Time= 0.450 Sec.
    I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.401 Sec.
    I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.610 Sec.
    I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.606 Sec.
    I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.577 Sec.
    I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.622 Sec.
    I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.612 Sec.
    I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.580 Sec.
    I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.610 Sec.
    I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.592 Sec.
    I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.591 Sec.
    I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.603 Sec.
    I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.595 Sec.
    I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.579 Sec.
    I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.587 Sec.
    I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.591 Sec.
    I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.587 Sec.
    I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.566 Sec.
    I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.511 Sec.
    I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.417 Sec.
    End of main loop
    End of calculation. Time= 31.546 Sec.
    End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
    Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.710( 0.817) Sec.
    ------ Ended super_pi run : Thu May 11 14:28:14 CDT 2006
  20. Quote:
    Obviously not your score, read the thread title next time.

    Obviously no need to be a jerk about it.

    I read the title and then the rest of the thread where it had already diverged off topic. Plus it is very interesting info and relatively on topic so I figured what the hell.

    Of all the crap posted on this forum, you picked that post to complain about? hehe.

    Back on Topic, two of my rigs:

    A64 3200+ @ 2.93GHz, Mushkin PC3500: 32.014 seconds

    P4 3.4E @ 3.8GHz, Micron PC3200: 34 seconds
    a64 at 2.93 and only 32 ? dude, what memory timings ?
  21. mine got 32 sec...2.6GHz @ 4000+
  22. 40 seconds

    AMD 3500+ 2.36ghz
  23. Quote:
    a64 at 2.93 and only 32 ? dude, what memory timings ?


    267MHz
    2-3-2-5

    Maybe I was running firefox at the same time, I heard that raises times. I dunno, but that is what I got. I'll run it again when I get home from work.
  24. Quote:
    a64 at 2.93 and only 32 ? dude, what memory timings ?


    267MHz
    2-3-2-5

    Maybe I was running firefox at the same time, I heard that raises times. I dunno, but that is what I got. I'll run it again when I get home from work.
    Dude, that's way faster than what I was running. You sure you weren't throttling? something might have been holding you back.
  25. I think I figured it out. Are you running dual channel? I'm only running one stick in that machine.
  26. yes
    could be, single channel seriously kills bandwidth.
  27. question: Running the test from the HD and a flash drive make a big difference right? On the flash drive it got 8m 31s :oops:
  28. Quote:
    I got about 01m 10. 969s On the Overclocked rig i got below. Lols pretty Impressive speeds eh. and they're only running on everything that's been listed below. Had to jump the PCI latency up to 35 just to get the graphic card to work correctly.


    There we go...1m 25s whew!! Hmm...everything in my sig is stock...
    you have very impressive speeds ;)
  29. Let see how much I can get when I lower my timing, I know that 1Gig and 2Gig will result in the same seconds. Will drop my timing from 4-4-4-12 to 3-4-3-4. Let see how that goes :lol:
  30. 35 seconds on my 1.66ghtz core duo notebook...
    37 seconds on my 3.4e oc'd to 3.9...core duo is gonna kick amd's as for the short term
  31. opty 165 1.3v @ 2.61GHz (290x9) in 38sec
    is there a way i can set affinity? will post higher OC score soon
  32. Just overclocked a bit more to 11x248 making for 2.73GHz on my Opteron 175 and got 31.12 seconds... Best superpi score I have got so far... Also ran 3DMark06 and got 5,036!
  33. i hate you guys with cool ram. haha. even at 2.79GHz i'm still getting 38secs. same as when i was at 2.61GHz ram @ 133. i think my ram is bottlenecking me. i had to set it to 100 in my bios to get my computer to boot at 2.79 (310x9) @1.4v. my ram is ghetto so i have to step it down a lot. 512mb pc3200 kingston value, and pc2700 ocz performance rev 3.2. yargghh... ram or vid card? so i chose a vidcard. i kinda regret it now. ;p free ghost recon on the way though. woohoo! ;p
  34. Quote:
    opty 165 1.3v @ 2.61GHz (290x9) in 38sec
    is there a way i can set affinity? will post higher OC score soon

    task manager. right click the process and set CPU core.
  35. Quote:
    i hate you guys with cool ram. haha. even at 2.79GHz i'm still getting 38secs. same as when i was at 2.61GHz ram @ 133. i think my ram is bottlenecking me. i had to set it to 100 in my bios to get my computer to boot at 2.79 (310x9) @1.4v. my ram is ghetto so i have to step it down a lot. 512mb pc3200 kingston value, and pc2700 ocz performance rev 3.2. yargghh... ram or vid card? so i chose a vidcard. i kinda regret it now. ;p free ghost recon on the way though. woohoo! ;p

    lol i probably should have pushed for a nice video card, as my ram literally only costed $50 less. 6800gt is outdated while redline high voltage is some of the nicest ddr1 =o
  36. 38s on a Mobile A64 4000+ (Newark, 2.6Ghz, pc2700 memory)

    i imagine the poor memory bandwidth is holding it back a bit
  37. i get 37s with a 3800+ at stock speed,gunna oc it after exams
  38. Quote:
    i hate you guys with cool ram. haha. even at 2.79GHz i'm still getting 38secs. same as when i was at 2.61GHz ram @ 133. i think my ram is bottlenecking me. i had to set it to 100 in my bios to get my computer to boot at 2.79 (310x9) @1.4v. my ram is ghetto so i have to step it down a lot. 512mb pc3200 kingston value, and pc2700 ocz performance rev 3.2. yargghh... ram or vid card? so i chose a vidcard. i kinda regret it now. ;p free ghost recon on the way though. woohoo! ;p

    lol i probably should have pushed for a nice video card, as my ram literally only costed $50 less. 6800gt is outdated while redline high voltage is some of the nicest ddr1 =o

    lol.... wanna trade? i'll give you $50 ;p bwahaha. in my dreams.
  39. Opteron 146 @ 2.4GHz w/ RAM @ 220MHz (2-2-2-7) = 33.625s
  40. 34s - a64 3000+ @ 2.6ghz, ddr 470
    hint turn off your firewalls and msn, aim bittorrent when benching superpi, makes a diff. for me it was 2 seconds!!
  41. lolls /oMG u should seriously consider an overclock. to atleast (136X12.5=1700Mhz) u'll get sub Teens with this suggestion.
    lols hey im running at the P-rating your supposed to be beating
  42. Sadly I set my RAM timing from 4-4-4-12 to 3-4-3-4 and did not even gain one second. :evil:
  43. Quote:
    Sadly I set my RAM timing from 4-4-4-12 to 3-4-3-4 and did not even gain one second. :evil:

    takes at least 100 mhz or more to get a second...nice try though ;p
    btw, try taking 2 sticks out since 2 stick dual channel runs faster than 4.
  44. SPi1M: 31.422, rig in sig
  45. Even if you changed your Timings, Did you have to change the Latency speeds? like to Fast and normal like? Cuse i changed 2/3 to fast from normal.
  46. SPi1M: 32.031 with rig as per my sig

    Memory running at 220.8MHz 2-3-2-6 1T
  47. I am too lazy to open the case and take 2 sticks out lol... maybe next time 8O
  48. My work PCs:
    Dell P4 3GHz desktop: 43s
    Dell Core Duo 1.66GHz laptop: 36s
  49. 1M 32s xeon 3.6
Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Pentium