Me... If the benchmarks are good. If not then AM2, but considering it is new design that more closely resemble's the Pentium M architecture than the P4's, it should be able to beat AMD's CPU.
Being able to execute 4 instructions per cycle is good too.
Me... If the benchmarks are good. If not then AM2, but considering it is new design that more closely resemble's the Pentium M architecture than the P4's, it should be able to beat AMD's CPU.
Being able to execute 4 instructions per cycle is good too.
This is not 100% true. Intel's conroe's has 1 complex and three simple decoders vs AMD's 3 complex decoders. There might be cases when AMD's offerings outperforms intel's on applications that uses strong FP (I'm not referring to a toy benchmark like superpi).
This is not 100% true. Intel's conroe's has 1 complex and three simple decoders vs AMD's 3 complex decoders. There might be cases when AMD's offerings outperforms intel's on applications that uses strong FP (I'm not referring to a toy benchmark like superpi).
And according to everyones favourite site AMD's quad core will only have 2mb of L3 cache, OMG less then woodcrest's L2 cache, major cache thrashing!!!11
And according to everyones favourite site AMD's quad core will only have 2mb of L3 cache, OMG less then woodcrest's L2 cache, major cache thrashing!!!11