A short while ago we tested Intel's latest flagship processor, the Pentium EE 965 (Extreme Edition), which costs nearly $1,100 at retail outlets. Even this CPU, which still isn't available at too many locations, has to surrender first place to this stealth candidate. Things look the same for the top-of-the-line AMD processor, the Athlon 64 FX-60, which also fell behind in most of our benchmarking categories.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/05/10/dual_41_ghz_cores/page7.html
A shrewd move by Intel, it has the hall marks of an Intel come-back.
The fact that Intel has won the OC crown back, has 45nm wafers set to go Conroe in the wings,and AMD is stuck on 90nm---with just a new name for its AM2 platform, with renamed processors,does this spell doom and gloom for AMD? Will it survive the $M + Intel joint venture, or will it end up dead and buried?
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/05/10/dual_41_ghz_cores/page7.html
A shrewd move by Intel, it has the hall marks of an Intel come-back.
The fact that Intel has won the OC crown back, has 45nm wafers set to go Conroe in the wings,and AMD is stuck on 90nm---with just a new name for its AM2 platform, with renamed processors,does this spell doom and gloom for AMD? Will it survive the $M + Intel joint venture, or will it end up dead and buried?