Would buying a faster, larger hard drive ever require me to increase the amount of RAM in my system?
I went from a 20 GB, 2 MB buffer, 7200 RPM, IDE ATA 66 (Maxtor 52049U4) hard drive to a 250 GB, 16 MB buffer, 7200 RPM, IDE ATA 133 (Maxtor 6B250R0) hard drive and I've noticed a decrease in certain performance. Video is choppy at times with the new one and never before with the old one. I sense that my system is a bit more sluggish. Load times are appear to be faster. I have 512 MB of RAM on WinXP. Would the larger buffer and transfer rates require more RAM?
More info
Processor: P4 2.4 GHz; Video Card: Geforce 6200 256 MB
I thought that since both hard drives have the Average Seek Time (9Ms) the larger could be slower since it is seeking over roughly 10 times the space. Does that make any sense?
Additional info: My motherboard (ASUS P4VP-MX) does support UltraDMA 133 and both the BIOS and WinXP recognize it as such.
I went from a 20 GB, 2 MB buffer, 7200 RPM, IDE ATA 66 (Maxtor 52049U4) hard drive to a 250 GB, 16 MB buffer, 7200 RPM, IDE ATA 133 (Maxtor 6B250R0) hard drive and I've noticed a decrease in certain performance. Video is choppy at times with the new one and never before with the old one. I sense that my system is a bit more sluggish. Load times are appear to be faster. I have 512 MB of RAM on WinXP. Would the larger buffer and transfer rates require more RAM?
More info
Processor: P4 2.4 GHz; Video Card: Geforce 6200 256 MB
I thought that since both hard drives have the Average Seek Time (9Ms) the larger could be slower since it is seeking over roughly 10 times the space. Does that make any sense?
Additional info: My motherboard (ASUS P4VP-MX) does support UltraDMA 133 and both the BIOS and WinXP recognize it as such.