alright prices for the pentium D 9 series have dropped a great deal now. I see a need to revise the priceerformance ratio as AMD no longer is the sole leader for the "bang for buck" hype. The 950 has come close to a x2 3800+'s price range, or mayb a x2 4200+'s. And a x2 4400+ seems to b priced reasonably higher than the 950. So its no longer the same battle. With 930 being dirt cheap and offering a close fight in benchmarks against the x2 3800+, what does the outcome look like? Well..im planning to get a new system within the nxt few days, not months. I can't afford to wait for Conroe, let alone AM2.
I was looking at a64 x2 3800+ for a while then stumbled upon the d930 with a cheaper tag. The d950 is also reasonable (priced on-par w/ x2 3800+) bt i'v heard tht when it comes to pentium d 9x series, only the 930 is value for money. So putting value-for-money pentium against value-for-money athlon64, which would prove better for some1 who's gaming FEAR & the likes, & at the same time handling multi-threaded apps & doing graphic 2d/3d model/design/animation? Help appreciated. Thx beforehand.
I was looking at a64 x2 3800+ for a while then stumbled upon the d930 with a cheaper tag. The d950 is also reasonable (priced on-par w/ x2 3800+) bt i'v heard tht when it comes to pentium d 9x series, only the 930 is value for money. So putting value-for-money pentium against value-for-money athlon64, which would prove better for some1 who's gaming FEAR & the likes, & at the same time handling multi-threaded apps & doing graphic 2d/3d model/design/animation? Help appreciated. Thx beforehand.