Why is porting numbers such an issue?

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

Hi,

I am considering signing up with a voip service but if I do so, I would
like to port my current land line number. I have a friend who attempted
to do this through Vonage. When He signed up, he was given a temp
number"just until his original number was transfered." Well to make a
long story short after two months, and numerous calls both to SBC and
Vonage, he got tired of waiting. He bit the bullet, disconnected his
land line and just gave out his "temp" vonage number as his primary
phone. I don't know if this sort of thing is common. Does it have
anything to do with SBC dragging their feet and not wanting to
relinquish numbers, or should I stop being so cynical?


I called BroadVoice the other day. Their unlimited world plan sounded
like a great deal. I was already to fill out the number porting form
which is prominently displayed on their page but was confused because at
the same time, the page stated that the ability to port numbers was not
yet available. I called BroadVoice. The guy I spoke with confirmed
that they are not yet able to port numbers. He said that they are
hoping to be able to start doing so some time in the first quarter of
next year (Translation, they are hoping to start but they have no idea
when it will happen).

So all indications I have had so far is that this whole process is one
big hassle. What's the deal?

--Al
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <MPG.1c2ecccfa799612b9896a8@news.giganews.com>, Al Puzzuoli
<alpuzz@comcast.net> writes:

>Hi,
>
>I am considering signing up with a voip service but if I do so, I would
>like to port my current land line number. I have a friend who attempted
>to do this through Vonage. When He signed up, he was given a temp
>number"just until his original number was transfered." Well to make a
>long story short after two months, and numerous calls both to SBC and
>Vonage, he got tired of waiting. He bit the bullet, disconnected his
>land line and just gave out his "temp" vonage number as his primary
>phone. I don't know if this sort of thing is common. Does it have
>anything to do with SBC dragging their feet and not wanting to
>relinquish numbers, or should I stop being so cynical?

I'm in the process. I don't think you can really blame the newcomers when the
RBOCs are fighting them every inch of the way. If my LNP gets rejected from
Comcast, I will probably select a number near one of my relatives. You can
have your number (and virtual numbers) anywhere you want.

If you do join Vonage, by your own device at a local store and retail activate
it. There is a $50 rebate, no shipping, and no activation fees. Plus, google
for coupons when you join to get a referral credit of a free month. If you
don't like it, return it to the store. If you do, there are no fees unless you
cancel, then you still have to return the device to Vonage or you are charged
$39.99. My first bill is:

Phone Number                                  1     $0.00     $0.00
Activation Fee                                1     $0.00     $0.00
Residential Basic 500 Plan                    1    $14.99    $14.99
                               -------------------------------------
                                      FET Tax:                $0.45
                                      Regulatory Recovery Fee:$1.50
                                      Shipping:               $0.00
                                      Total:                 $16.94


>I called BroadVoice the other day. Their unlimited world plan sounded
>like a great deal. I was already to fill out the number porting form
>which is prominently displayed on their page but was confused because at
>the same time, the page stated that the ability to port numbers was not
>yet available. I called BroadVoice. The guy I spoke with confirmed
>that they are not yet able to port numbers. He said that they are
>hoping to be able to start doing so some time in the first quarter of
>next year (Translation, they are hoping to start but they have no idea
>when it will happen).

Google Broadvoice. Same story for at least six months now. That is the only
reason I left them after 6 weeks. Otherwise, if LNP is not important to you,
they are a great deal. I was signed up on their BYOD plan (Sipura 1000) for
$5.95/mo+. Once I saw they weren't porting my number, which is why I initially
joined them, I figured I might as well just by prepaid minutes with my ATA for
LD calls. I found a place that sells them for $3.00 paypal at .012/min, no
other fees, perfect quality. www.mutualphone.com

>So all indications I have had so far is that this whole process is one
>big hassle. What's the deal?

Here is my confirmation email. What IS good about Vonage is that you are kept
informed of the LNP progress in your control panel.

Updated Date: Number Transfer Progress History:

December 15, 2004 Awaiting Letter of Authorization
December 15, 2004 Letter of Authorization (LOA) Received
December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier
December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier

------------------------------------------
Thank you for placing your order with Vonage.  
 
**PLEASE NOTE**: You have directed Vonage to assign your
existing phone number to Vonage service. Before we can
assign your number, your former telephone carrier must first process
your request. Once your former carrier releases this number,
Vonage assigns it to you immediately.

**IMPORTANT**: In order to begin the Number Transfer Process,
Vonage must receive your Letter of Authorization (LOA)
form as well as a recent copy of your local phone bill.
 
In the interim, Vonage provides you with a courtesy
temporary virtual number. This number is labeled (VIRTUAL) in the
paragraph below. Please feel free to use this number until your
carrier releases your existing number. Please note that transferring
your number can take at least 15 - 20 business days upon receipt of
complete and correct paperwork. Vonage will keep you informed of the
transfer process via email along the way.
 
Your new Vonage Telephone Numbers,
Voicemail Access Numbers and temporary Voicemail PINs are:
Phone Number                 Voicemail Access Number  PIN
1-xxx-xxxx
1-(VIRTUAL)

You can set up your voicemail at any time by calling your Voicemail Access
Number and following the instructions.

Your 11-Digit Vonage phone number is your mailbox number.

For your protection, please change your Voicemail PIN as
soon as possible.

Please take a few minutes to review the details of your order.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

Remember Slamming?

You had AT&T for long distance, then you start getting LD bills from JoeBlow
Telecom. You were slammed.

The same safeguards that prevent that from happening today, and also placed
on LNP.

You have to keep in mind that the L in LNP means local. You can have your
number (and virtual numbers) anywhere you want IS NOT true. Try moving POTS
from one LATA to another, and you will be denied. New York number in
California without VoIP, I do not think so.

But what it really looks like there are two factors involved. Just one or
both will make it tough on Vonage.
1. Vonage does not have their act together. Moving numbers (LNP) can be
automated. Sounds like they are doing it manually and hitting all the red
tape that the RBOCs have in place.
2. Vonage does not have a physical network in the SBC footprint. Makes
routing numbers to the right location tricky.

Brian LaVallee

"pleonard" <pleonard@pobox.moc> wrote in message
news:6l3as0dchnoitpio3u2s97j7qkiv4tukr2@4ax.com...
> In article ID <MPG.1c2ecccfa799612b9896a8@news.giganews.com>, Al Puzzuoli
> <alpuzz@comcast.net> writes:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am considering signing up with a voip service but if I do so, I would
>>like to port my current land line number. I have a friend who attempted
>>to do this through Vonage. When He signed up, he was given a temp
>>number"just until his original number was transfered." Well to make a
>>long story short after two months, and numerous calls both to SBC and
>>Vonage, he got tired of waiting. He bit the bullet, disconnected his
>>land line and just gave out his "temp" vonage number as his primary
>>phone. I don't know if this sort of thing is common. Does it have
>>anything to do with SBC dragging their feet and not wanting to
>>relinquish numbers, or should I stop being so cynical?
>
> I'm in the process. I don't think you can really blame the newcomers when
> the
> RBOCs are fighting them every inch of the way. If my LNP gets rejected
> from
> Comcast, I will probably select a number near one of my relatives. You can
> have your number (and virtual numbers) anywhere you want.
>
> If you do join Vonage, by your own device at a local store and retail
> activate
> it. There is a $50 rebate, no shipping, and no activation fees. Plus,
> google
> for coupons when you join to get a referral credit of a free month. If you
> don't like it, return it to the store. If you do, there are no fees unless
> you
> cancel, then you still have to return the device to Vonage or you are
> charged
> $39.99. My first bill is:
>
> Phone Number 1 $0.00 $0.00
> Activation Fee 1 $0.00 $0.00
> Residential Basic 500 Plan 1 $14.99 $14.99
> -------------------------------------
> FET Tax: $0.45
> Regulatory Recovery Fee:$1.50
> Shipping: $0.00
> Total: $16.94
>
>
>>I called BroadVoice the other day. Their unlimited world plan sounded
>>like a great deal. I was already to fill out the number porting form
>>which is prominently displayed on their page but was confused because at
>>the same time, the page stated that the ability to port numbers was not
>>yet available. I called BroadVoice. The guy I spoke with confirmed
>>that they are not yet able to port numbers. He said that they are
>>hoping to be able to start doing so some time in the first quarter of
>>next year (Translation, they are hoping to start but they have no idea
>>when it will happen).
>
> Google Broadvoice. Same story for at least six months now. That is the
> only
> reason I left them after 6 weeks. Otherwise, if LNP is not important to
> you,
> they are a great deal. I was signed up on their BYOD plan (Sipura 1000)
> for
> $5.95/mo+. Once I saw they weren't porting my number, which is why I
> initially
> joined them, I figured I might as well just by prepaid minutes with my ATA
> for
> LD calls. I found a place that sells them for $3.00 paypal at .012/min, no
> other fees, perfect quality. www.mutualphone.com
>
>>So all indications I have had so far is that this whole process is one
>>big hassle. What's the deal?
>
> Here is my confirmation email. What IS good about Vonage is that you are
> kept
> informed of the LNP progress in your control panel.
>
> Updated Date: Number Transfer Progress History:
>
> December 15, 2004 Awaiting Letter of Authorization
> December 15, 2004 Letter of Authorization (LOA) Received
> December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier
> December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Thank you for placing your order with Vonage.
>
> **PLEASE NOTE**: You have directed Vonage to assign your
> existing phone number to Vonage service. Before we can
> assign your number, your former telephone carrier must first process
> your request. Once your former carrier releases this number,
> Vonage assigns it to you immediately.
>
> **IMPORTANT**: In order to begin the Number Transfer Process,
> Vonage must receive your Letter of Authorization (LOA)
> form as well as a recent copy of your local phone bill.
>
> In the interim, Vonage provides you with a courtesy
> temporary virtual number. This number is labeled (VIRTUAL) in the
> paragraph below. Please feel free to use this number until your
> carrier releases your existing number. Please note that transferring
> your number can take at least 15 - 20 business days upon receipt of
> complete and correct paperwork. Vonage will keep you informed of the
> transfer process via email along the way.
>
> Your new Vonage Telephone Numbers,
> Voicemail Access Numbers and temporary Voicemail PINs are:
> Phone Number Voicemail Access Number PIN
> 1-xxx-xxxx
> 1-(VIRTUAL)
>
> You can set up your voicemail at any time by calling your Voicemail Access
> Number and following the instructions.
>
> Your 11-Digit Vonage phone number is your mailbox number.
>
> For your protection, please change your Voicemail PIN as
> soon as possible.
>
> Please take a few minutes to review the details of your order.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In message <d_adnZzEds94zEncRVn-og@broadviewnet.net> "Brian LaVallee"
<poing@REMOVE-NO_SPAM-THIS.comcast.net> wrote:

>You had AT&T for long distance, then you start getting LD bills from JoeBlow
>Telecom. You were slammed.

I always considered that a good thing -- Free long distance until they
reverse it (And contrary to their claims, they CAN take their service
off your phone line again. You'll likely revert to the default LD
carrier though, not your previous choice)

I have no business relationship with JoeBlow Telecom, and have not
authorized them to transfer my LD service, so I wouldn't pay JoeBlow nor
acknowledge their existence in any way unless they took it to small
claims court.

In these parts, anyway, small claims courts took a dim view of slamming
-- However, if you pay a penny to JoeBlow, it solidifies the business
relationship and you'll probably be on the hook for the entire bill.

The is the same principle as when a company mails a product to you
without you having previously requested it. You are under no obligation
to pay for the product, nor to return it. If they delivered it
personally rather then shipped it via mail or a courier, you can
actually go after them for disposal fees to cover your time and
expresses taking their product to the dump to dispose of it.


--
They'll say, 'You can't joke about rape. Rape's not funny.'
I can prove to you that rape is funny. Picture Porky Pig raping Elmer Fudd.
See? Hey, why do you think they call him Porky?
-- George Carlin
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <d_adnZzEds94zEncRVn-og@broadviewnet.net>, "Brian LaVallee"
<poing@REMOVE-NO_SPAM-THIS.comcast.net> writes:

>But what it really looks like there are two factors involved. Just one or
>both will make it tough on Vonage.
>1. Vonage does not have their act together. Moving numbers (LNP) can be
>automated. Sounds like they are doing it manually and hitting all the red
>tape that the RBOCs have in place.
>2. Vonage does not have a physical network in the SBC footprint. Makes
>routing numbers to the right location tricky.

>>>So all indications I have had so far is that this whole process is one
>>>big hassle. What's the deal?
>>
>> Here is my confirmation email. What IS good about Vonage is that you are
>> kept
>> informed of the LNP progress in your control panel.
>>
>> Updated Date: Number Transfer Progress History:
>>
>> December 15, 2004 Awaiting Letter of Authorization
>> December 15, 2004 Letter of Authorization (LOA) Received
>> December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier
>> December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier

Vonage's LNP went fine for me from Comcast Digital Phone. Now I'm thinking I'm
very fortunate based on what you are saying. <g>

December 15, 2004 Awaiting Letter of Authorization
December 15, 2004 Letter of Authorization (LOA) Received
December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier
December 15, 2004 Transfer Sent to Carrier
December 23, 2004 Carrier Approved Transfer
December 27, 2004 Completed LNP Transfer
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

Al Puzzuoli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am considering signing up with a voip service but if I do so, I
> would like to port my current land line number. I have a friend
> who attempted to do this through Vonage. When He signed up, he was
> given a temp number"just until his original number was transfered."
> Well to make a long story short after two months, and numerous
> calls both to SBC and Vonage, he got tired of waiting. He bit the
> bullet, disconnected his land line and just gave out his "temp"
> vonage number as his primary phone. I don't know if this sort of
> thing is common. Does it have anything to do with SBC dragging
> their feet and not wanting to relinquish numbers, or should I stop
> being so cynical?

I'm just wondering if it's a good idea to do this, what if you want to go
back the other way with your number one day..? After all you will still
need a landline to get your VoIP service over anyway, so what number does
that get when you've transferred its number to VoIP..?

I prefer a totally separate (and new) number, I can then give it to those
I don't particularly trust with my private home number. It's less likely
to cause problems if the VoIP system goes off for any reason, don't forget
it is still a relatively new technology and not 100% reliable, so is it
wise to depend completely on it for your phone service..?

Ivor
 

P

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
56
0
18,630
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <cr258m$i7n$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

>I'm just wondering if it's a good idea to do this, what if you want to go
>back the other way with your number one day..? After all you will still
>need a landline to get your VoIP service over anyway, so what number does
>that get when you've transferred its number to VoIP..?
>
>I prefer a totally separate (and new) number, I can then give it to those
>I don't particularly trust with my private home number. It's less likely
>to cause problems if the VoIP system goes off for any reason, don't forget
>it is still a relatively new technology and not 100% reliable, so is it
>wise to depend completely on it for your phone service..?

I will depend on my cell phone. Personally, I believe everyone will use their
cell phone only and dump POTS. The youngest generation of adults are going
cell only, from what I can see. The only reason for me to port my home number
to a voip provider is to keep the number I've had for a few years. If I have
to lose that, I will just eliminate my landline and go cell only for incoming
calls. Then I will use a pay-as-you voip for outbound service for LD.
Currently, I use www.mutualphone.com for .012/min. calls.

From what I've read, WRT porting your number back to POTS, it is actually very
easy "IF" the number originated with your local telephone company. They're
still partially in control of your number, including the CID database.

OTOH, if you try to port out a number generated by the voip provider, it won't
happen. So, the key to keeping your POTS phone number is to never cancel it,
just port it to your new provider. Further, I've read that porting your number
BACK to POTS is extremely easy, since they already control the number and they
want to get back your business ASAP.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

> In article ID <cr258m$i7n$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
> <this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

[snip]

>> I prefer a totally separate (and new) number, I can then give it
>> to those I don't particularly trust with my private home number.
>> It's less likely to cause problems if the VoIP system goes off for
>> any reason, don't forget it is still a relatively new technology
>> and not 100% reliable, so is it wise to depend completely on it
>> for your phone service..?
>
> I will depend on my cell phone. Personally, I believe everyone will
> use their cell phone only and dump POTS. The youngest generation of
> adults are going cell only, from what I can see. The only reason
> for me to port my home number to a voip provider is to keep the
> number I've had for a few years. If I have to lose that, I will
> just eliminate my landline and go cell only for incoming calls.
> Then I will use a pay-as-you voip for outbound service for LD.
> Currently, I use www.mutualphone.com for .012/min. calls.

So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You just
eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a way to get VoIP
without a line of some description coming into the house, be it twisted
pair or cable. Given this, you might as well keep the landline you already
have and use VoIP as a second line.

I actually use my cellular phone for 90% of my outgoing calls anyway, as I
have a good deal for inclusive minutes. But I wouldn't want to rely 100%
on it though, in case of an emergency it may not be working.

Ivor
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In message <cr3e7o$fo7$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:

>So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You just
>eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a way to get VoIP
>without a line of some description coming into the house, be it twisted
>pair or cable. Given this, you might as well keep the landline you already
>have and use VoIP as a second line.

Cable is one option, wireless is another, DSL is a third. None of these
three technically require dialtone on the phone line, although depending
on your telco they may have additional requirements.


--
Warning Dates in Calendar are closer than they appear.
 

P

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
56
0
18,630
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <cr3e7o$fo7$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

>
>So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You just
>eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a way to get VoIP
>without a line of some description coming into the house, be it twisted
>pair or cable. Given this, you might as well keep the landline you already
>have and use VoIP as a second line.

Cable, router and an Analog Telephone Adapter.

>I actually use my cellular phone for 90% of my outgoing calls anyway, as I
>have a good deal for inclusive minutes. But I wouldn't want to rely 100%
>on it though, in case of an emergency it may not be working.

It goes to voice mail. Same as if your VOIP goes down.
 

P

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
56
0
18,630
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <cr3e7o$fo7$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

>So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You just
>eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a way to get VoIP
>without a line of some description coming into the house, be it twisted
>pair or cable. Given this, you might as well keep the landline you already
>have and use VoIP as a second line.

Re-reading your post and mine, I think I might need to clarify something here.

I had Comcast (formerly attbi) CableTV/Internet/Digital Phone service. These
three services all run off of the same cable. I was issued a POTS number and I
received a local number from attbi (AT&T Broadband Internet). I still have
Comcast CableTV/Internet, but I have disconnected their Digital Phone Service
from the same cable.

Recently, I sent in an LOA (Letter Of Authorization) request to Vonage to port
(LNP Local Number Portability) my local POTS number over from Comcast, thereby
retaining my current phone number. Vonage is a VOIP (Voice Over Internet
Protocol) provider and their service relies on any Internet connection,
anywhere in the world. This allows me to retain my local phone number for
incoming calls, where ever I am in the world with my device. Vonage has a
relationship with a couple of telephone companies to allow me to connect to
regular POTS lines.
-------------------------------------------Quote-------------------------
http://www.vonage-forum.com/ftopic813.html

I'm in the VoIP business.

Your INBOUND calls are received near where you're number is "physically"
located and is terminated on numbers owned by (for the moment) one of two
CLECS (Focal and Paetec). However, Focal and Paetec are only used for INBOUND
calls, no outbound calls come back through these gateways. How much Vonage
pays these CLEC's is private data.

From there the call jumps onto a Level3 IP Networks and seeks your little ATA
out.

All OUTBOUND calls (whether local or long distance) are immediately "dumped"
to a termination partner. Most calls I've monitored are being sent to Global
Crossing. However, Vonage probably has numerous SIP Termination partners and
it's proxy server/call switch can send your call.

The irony to this is the Vonage quickly gets your OUTBOUND calls onto the good
ole PSTN almost immediately. Why? Cause LD termination is cheap! No need to
have IP to get cheap.
----------------------------------------End Quote--------------------------

You do not need ANY incoming phone service to call outbound on VOIP. In fact,
most of the very inexpensive services you see on the Internet are for outgoing
only. Mutual phone, SIPphone, FWD, etc. are examples. There ARE ways to
forward incoming calls to these services by getting a free POTS line in
another state, like at http://www.ipkall.com/

So, in the event that I could not have kept my local phone number for some
reason, I would have just eliminated any incoming service. What I'm saying is,
and it makes sense, that any service that includes unlimited incoming service
incurs a monthly charge, while an outgoing plan can be pay-as-you-go.

I own my own ATA (Analog Telephone Adapter) which let's me add as many minutes
as I want, just like a pre-paid telephone card. That is a "backup" to my cell
phone for outgoing. The Vonage device I also have, is locked to Vonage's
service only.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

DevilsPGD wrote:
> In message <cr3e7o$fo7$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
> <this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:
>
>> So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You just
>> eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a way to
>> get VoIP without a line of some description coming into the house,
>> be it twisted pair or cable. Given this, you might as well keep
>> the landline you already have and use VoIP as a second line.
>
> Cable is one option, wireless is another, DSL is a third. None of
> these three technically require dialtone on the phone line,
> although depending on your telco they may have additional
> requirements.

Depends on where you live. Here in the UK you require a POTS line to get
ADSL, whether you use it or not. Cable broadband is technically available
without any other services but is very hard to get. By wireless I assume
you mean 2-way satellite..? Very expensive and very slow, not viable for a
single user.

Here, at any rate, it's not yet viable to do away with an ordinary
landline in favour of VoIP. Maybe one day, but not yet.

Ivor
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In message <cr4udi$ljg$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:

>DevilsPGD wrote:
>> In message <cr3e7o$fo7$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
>> <this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:
>>
>>> So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You just
>>> eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a way to
>>> get VoIP without a line of some description coming into the house,
>>> be it twisted pair or cable. Given this, you might as well keep
>>> the landline you already have and use VoIP as a second line.
>>
>> Cable is one option, wireless is another, DSL is a third. None of
>> these three technically require dialtone on the phone line,
>> although depending on your telco they may have additional
>> requirements.
>
>Depends on where you live. Here in the UK you require a POTS line to get
>ADSL, whether you use it or not.

That's an administrative decision by your telco and/or the regulatory
body, not a technical limitation.

>Cable broadband is technically available
>without any other services but is very hard to get.

A phone call to the cable company isn't sufficient to order the service?

>By wireless I assume
>you mean 2-way satellite..? Very expensive and very slow, not viable for a
>single user.

I wouldn't recommend satellite, the latency is too high for typical VoIP
usage. It might work, but the latency would be too annoying for average
phone calls.

However, you could go wireless (if there are any carriers in the area).
There are a number of wireless technologies, anything from GRPS to
point-to-point microwave to RF are all valid options for wireless
communication over a distance.

>Here, at any rate, it's not yet viable to do away with an ordinary
>landline in favour of VoIP. Maybe one day, but not yet.

Perhaps not where you live, but it's very practical here.

--
Some people are like Slinkies... You can't help but
smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

> In article ID <cr3e7o$fo7$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
> <this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:
>
>>
>> So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You just
>> eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a way to
>> get VoIP without a line of some description coming into the house,
>> be it twisted pair or cable. Given this, you might as well keep
>> the landline you already have and use VoIP as a second line.
>
> Cable, router and an Analog Telephone Adapter.

Cable. Which comes in 99% of cases with an analogue phone line included.

>> I actually use my cellular phone for 90% of my outgoing calls
>> anyway, as I have a good deal for inclusive minutes. But I
>> wouldn't want to rely 100% on it though, in case of an emergency
>> it may not be working.
>
> It goes to voice mail. Same as if your VOIP goes down.

Not all VoIP providers (yet) have automatic voicemail. But you haven't
answered my question - what do you use for an emergency outgoing call..?
Your cellular battery has just gone flat and the local BTS is down anyway.

Ivor
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In message <cr4ujo$qi8$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:

>>> I actually use my cellular phone for 90% of my outgoing calls
>>> anyway, as I have a good deal for inclusive minutes. But I
>>> wouldn't want to rely 100% on it though, in case of an emergency
>>> it may not be working.
>>
>> It goes to voice mail. Same as if your VOIP goes down.
>
>Not all VoIP providers (yet) have automatic voicemail.

True, but many/most do. Implementing voicemail is extremely simple,
it's mainly just a matter of the storage space required.

>But you haven't
>answered my question - what do you use for an emergency outgoing call..?

Cell phone.

>Your cellular battery has just gone flat and the local BTS is down anyway.

If your need for emergency services access isn't sufficient motivation
to keep your phone charged you can buy a backup battery which you leave
on a charger at all times -- This will ensure that you always have the
capability to make an emergency call if needed.

--
Some people are like Slinkies... You can't help but
smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

DevilsPGD wrote:
> In message <cr4udi$ljg$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
> <this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:
>
>> DevilsPGD wrote:
>>> In message <cr3e7o$fo7$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
>>> <this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So how are you going to get VoIP with no line coming in..? You
>>>> just eliminated your landline, remember..?! I don't know of a
>>>> way to get VoIP without a line of some description coming into
>>>> the house, be it twisted pair or cable. Given this, you might as
>>>> well keep the landline you already have and use VoIP as a second
>>>> line.
>>>
>>> Cable is one option, wireless is another, DSL is a third. None of
>>> these three technically require dialtone on the phone line,
>>> although depending on your telco they may have additional
>>> requirements.
>>
>> Depends on where you live. Here in the UK you require a POTS line
>> to get ADSL, whether you use it or not.
>
> That's an administrative decision by your telco and/or the
> regulatory body, not a technical limitation.

But still the case, so largely irrelevant.

>> Cable broadband is technically available
>> without any other services but is very hard to get.
>
> A phone call to the cable company isn't sufficient to order the
> service?

Rarely. It isn't advertised as an available option. You *can* have it, but
it's very hard to persuade them to sell it to you, they want you to have
phone and TV as well..!

>> By wireless I assume
>> you mean 2-way satellite..? Very expensive and very slow, not
>> viable for a single user.
>
> I wouldn't recommend satellite, the latency is too high for typical
> VoIP usage. It might work, but the latency would be too annoying
> for average phone calls.
>
> However, you could go wireless (if there are any carriers in the
> area). There are a number of wireless technologies, anything from
> GRPS to point-to-point microwave to RF are all valid options for
> wireless communication over a distance.

Not available for individual users. Not here, anyway.
>
>> Here, at any rate, it's not yet viable to do away with an ordinary
>> landline in favour of VoIP. Maybe one day, but not yet.
>
> Perhaps not where you live, but it's very practical here.

At the end of the day, it all boils down to practicalities. If nobody
provides the service, you don't get it..!

Personally, I's still be very reluctant to do away with a traditional POTS
line, even if I do only keep it for emergencies.

Ivor
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

DevilsPGD wrote:

[snip]

> Cell phone.
>
>> Your cellular battery has just gone flat and the local BTS is down
>> anyway.
>
> If your need for emergency services access isn't sufficient
> motivation to keep your phone charged you can buy a backup battery
> which you leave on a charger at all times -- This will ensure that
> you always have the capability to make an emergency call if needed.

You missed the part about your local base not being on air. You have no
signal. You live in an area where there is no coverage. You have no
signal. It's midnight on New Year's Eve and all the cells are clogged with
idiots singing to each other. You have no signal.

Get the picture..? Cellular *may* not work, then what do you do when your
78 year old mother is lying on the floor in need of an ambulance..?

Ivor
 

P

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
56
0
18,630
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <cr4ujo$qi8$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

>Not all VoIP providers (yet) have automatic voicemail. But you haven't
>answered my question - what do you use for an emergency outgoing call..?
>Your cellular battery has just gone flat and the local BTS is down anyway.

Plug my cell in to my car for a battery source?
 

P

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
56
0
18,630
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <cr5q51$94o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

>You missed the part about your local base not being on air. You have no
>signal. You live in an area where there is no coverage. You have no
>signal. It's midnight on New Year's Eve and all the cells are clogged with
>idiots singing to each other. You have no signal.
>
>Get the picture..? Cellular *may* not work, then what do you do when your
>78 year old mother is lying on the floor in need of an ambulance..?

Or your POTS line gets cut. What to do then?
 

P

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
56
0
18,630
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <cr5q51$94o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

>>local BTS is down anyway.

>You missed the part about your local base not being on air.

I too missed that part as you can see. I wasn't familiar with BTS. Now looking
it up "The name for the antenna and radio equipment necessary to provide
wireless service in an area. Also called a base station or cell site."

The odds of BOTH my cable being down AND my cell phone being down at the same
time would be truly unbelievable since neither of them has been down for any
period of time in the last 5 years I've lived in my current residence.

But we do have a form of POTS here in the States called Lifeline which is also
an option.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

p <<>> writes:

>From what I've read, WRT porting your number back to POTS, it is actually very
>easy "IF" the number originated with your local telephone company. They're
>still partially in control of your number, including the CID database.

I have read (sorry, no reference handy) that VoIP companies are not treated the
same as landline and mobile phone providers in this respect. While they can
take your number, they're not required to relinquish it. Seems odd but I can
imagine it...

>OTOH, if you try to port out a number generated by the voip provider, it won't
>happen.

....but maybe that's all it is and what I thought I understood isn't true.

>So, the key to keeping your POTS phone number is to never cancel it,
>just port it to your new provider.

That is almost certainly true. I have read several porting FAQs that instruct
to never cancel your number.

>Further, I've read that porting your number
>BACK to POTS is extremely easy, since they already control the number and they
>want to get back your business ASAP.

As another option, consider "remote call forwarding". You can do it *now*, it
will give you lots of flexibility and there's not a huge cost involved.

RCF is provided by your local telco. From what I understand, it's usually
marketed to businesses who want a telephone presence in a town (a local number)
without having a physical presence there. When you get RCF service you specify
a phone number where calls to some local number will ring. It *only* provides
forwarding.

Not only is the service cheaper than regular phone service but because it's one
way only many of the tariffs, etc. disappear. You'll also save on any special
services you had (CallerID, distinctive ring, ...) because now you'll get them
from your VoIP provider.

By going with RCF, you can choose whatever VoIP provider you want without being
so tied to which one has a local number in your area. This is a big deal for
me because I live in a DID black hole. (I forward my calls to a toll-free
LiveVoIP number.) I also figure it will make switching to another provider
trivial. I would hate to have my number in the hands of a company that goes
under. (Note that toll-free numbers are much easier to port. That's one
reason I'm starting to use them.)

If you're thinking about weaning off of your old number anyway, RCF might be a
quick and painless way to get started and shave quite a bit off your local bill.

--kyler
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In message <cr5q51$94o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:

>> If your need for emergency services access isn't sufficient
>> motivation to keep your phone charged you can buy a backup battery
>> which you leave on a charger at all times -- This will ensure that
>> you always have the capability to make an emergency call if needed.
>
>You missed the part about your local base not being on air. You have no
>signal. You live in an area where there is no coverage. You have no
>signal. It's midnight on New Year's Eve and all the cells are clogged with
>idiots singing to each other. You have no signal.
>
>Get the picture..? Cellular *may* not work, then what do you do when your
>78 year old mother is lying on the floor in need of an ambulance..?

What would you do if the landline service was overloaded and you
couldn't complete any calls? Or the local CO went off line? Or a
backhoe took out all the phone lines in your area?


--
In Jolt We Trust
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In message <cr5pse$8v2$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> wrote:

>>> Depends on where you live. Here in the UK you require a POTS line
>>> to get ADSL, whether you use it or not.
>>
>> That's an administrative decision by your telco and/or the
>> regulatory body, not a technical limitation.
>
>But still the case, so largely irrelevant.

Partially true. However, it's worth noting the difference since there
is no point petitioning the telco or a regulatory body to change a
technical limitation. However, since the problem is administrative, it
can be solved either by a regulatory body or the telco.

>>> Cable broadband is technically available
>>> without any other services but is very hard to get.
>>
>> A phone call to the cable company isn't sufficient to order the
>> service?
>
>Rarely. It isn't advertised as an available option. You *can* have it, but
>it's very hard to persuade them to sell it to you, they want you to have
>phone and TV as well..!

Interesting. Around here, if you call sales and tell them exactly what
you want, they may try to upsell but they won't force the issue -- The
cable company would rather sell something then nothing.

>>> Here, at any rate, it's not yet viable to do away with an ordinary
>>> landline in favour of VoIP. Maybe one day, but not yet.
>>
>> Perhaps not where you live, but it's very practical here.
>
>At the end of the day, it all boils down to practicalities. If nobody
>provides the service, you don't get it..!

Then you need to be in touch with the marketing department of the telco
and/or cable company.

>Personally, I's still be very reluctant to do away with a traditional POTS
>line, even if I do only keep it for emergencies.

For me, the cost/benefit ratio isn't worth it. I can walk to a
neighbour's house and use a landline, or I can use my cell. The odds of
both my cell service AND cable service going down at the same time is
fairly low.

The chance of it happening at the same time as everyone in the house
being unable to go to a neighbour's house is effectively zero.

--
In Jolt We Trust
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

x> In article ID <cr5q51$94o$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
> <this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:
>
>> You missed the part about your local base not being on air. You
>> have no signal. You live in an area where there is no coverage.
>> You have no signal. It's midnight on New Year's Eve and all the
>> cells are clogged with idiots singing to each other. You have no
>> signal.
>>
>> Get the picture..? Cellular *may* not work, then what do you do
>> when your 78 year old mother is lying on the floor in need of an
>> ambulance..?
>
> Or your POTS line gets cut. What to do then?

Why would it get cut..? The odds of this happening are somewhat remote,
particularly if the line is underground, rather than on a pole, as it is
here. The odds are greater that the cellular system might be down, which
is why I'd rather rely on POTS in an emergency.

Granted, the chances of POTS, cellular and VoIP *all* going down
simultaneously are somewhat remote, and I admit I was playing devils
advocate a little, but my point is don't rely on something new and/or high
tech in an emergency, the old tried/trusted things like POTS are far more
likely to survive problems. In over 30 years of living in this house, I
can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I've lost either
electricity or my POTS line. The local cellular base on the other hand
goes up and down like a yoyo, and VoIP, while reliable for the most part,
has been known to lock up if my router throws a wobbly..!

Happy New Year to all,

Ivor
 

P

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
56
0
18,630
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

In article ID <cr6s32$4c9$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Ivor Jones"
<this.address@notvalid.inv> writes:

>Granted, the chances of POTS, cellular and VoIP *all* going down
>simultaneously are somewhat remote, and I admit I was playing devils
>advocate a little, but my point is don't rely on something new and/or high
>tech in an emergency, the old tried/trusted things like POTS are far more
>likely to survive problems. In over 30 years of living in this house, I
>can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I've lost either
>electricity or my POTS line. The local cellular base on the other hand
>goes up and down like a yoyo, and VoIP, while reliable for the most part,
>has been known to lock up if my router throws a wobbly..!

Point taken.

>Happy New Year to all,

You too.