" I was wondering how big the performace boost is on the new AM2. "
That part is relatively easy to calculate, based on the preliminary benchmarks released the past few months...
Take any socket 939 rig, lower the multiplier by 1 to make it 200 MHz slower, and you have an equivalent AM2 rig equipped with more expensive DDR2/800!
Sad, really....
Not that bad, for the most aprt of the time it was like that S939 being equal to AM2 or better, but last time I checked (don't remember were, sorry
) the latest revision got 10% better performance in some tests, and avg bout 7%, so it's not as crappy as you say
About your second post, true on the keeping the same mobo for 1K years...it's not precisely the best but it works, and are you sure that Conroes will be @ 200$ there?
I know the wait will be long and the path hard, but I can't wait til the day that "conroes" get beaten by products of the same gen from AMD just like netburst was a total loss for intel, that way all the ppl with the "conroe syndrom" will calm down.
That last paragraph pretty much is flame-in-a-can, so plz deal with it properly and don't start another stupid flame war
Do I hate Intel? Nah, I'm a hardcore AMD fan? nay, but I'm upset because lamb-people, they do as their masters say. When the first conroe results came suddenly an Intel fanboy explosion happened (were there was one now were 15), just like the "Where can I get a D805?" threads, do you notice how such topics increased in the last week due to the 4.1Ghz P4D article?
I bet someone faked benchies saying X processor beats Y processor and X costs X/5 $ and a lot of people will start looking for that X processor....that's sad, but true