Archived from groups: alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (
More info?)
what is the "inlet_area" related too though? i think my install of the 757
is smaller than a 737's?! i thought it was the whole "fan" area of the
engine???
--
From Overlag - Adam Webb
"Gregory" <flightsim.maps@bkwds.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:j691g1p3236b2g2liuvntto1kpbue6fna4@4ax.com...
>
> The 757 thread a few days ago sparked some interest.. had Osky 757
> folder zipped onto `Aircraft Hanger' folder.. and then got a few more
> via download. Now here's a case-in-point. Since then have been
> Configuring, Editing, Analyzing, and converting 32-bit textures to
> DXT1 and DXT3.. and now have TWO flyable 757's.. one with PW
> and the other RR power.
>
> The comment was.. cut throttles and it `drops like rock'. Well the Cdo
> looks ok.. however here's some interesting info. The AIR files are
> ALMOST IDENTICLE!!
>
>
>
> AIR FILE
>
> Compare: (<) B757-200-PW-PW2043.txt (33170 bytes)
> with: (>) B757-200-RR-RB211-535E4B.txt (33179 bytes)
>
> 22c22
> < Engine Type: PW2043
> ---
>> Engine Type: RR RB211-535E4B
>
> 109c109
> < Max Range: 3,900 nm (7,222 km)
> ---
>> Max Range: 3,395 nm (6,286 km)
>
> 1288c1288
> < 0.000000 52.000000 82.500000
> ---
>> 0.000000 51.725000 82.500000
>
> 1389c1389
> < FIELD 0x540 0x0 DOUBLE 1.020000 *EGT Scale Factor
> ---
>> FIELD 0x540 0x0 DOUBLE 1.001000 *EGT Scale Factor
>
>
> And here's the Engine Data (exactly the same) with polynomials fitted
> over top.. followed by some brief comments.
>
>
http://home.comcast.net/~flightsim/752_1506.gif
>
>
http://home.comcast.net/~flightsim/752_1507.gif
>
>
> You see now the 0.9M Thrust Factor curve dips as throttles (and CN1)
> are cut.. in addition to the MSFS DEFAULT Mass Flow 1507 which is fat
> in the Hi-mach region for low engine revs. The two combined will
> produce a negative thrust.. which is essentially like a `reverse
> thrust' while descending at hi-speed / low revs.
>
> ALso the 0.9M Thrust Factor 1506 seems VERY aggressive.. nothing
> like climbing at 4,000 fpm direct to hi-cruise while loaded!! It's a
> nice rocketship sometimes!!! { grin } 757s are potent IRL..yes?
>
>
>
> AIRCRAFT CFG
>
> Here's another important result of Aircraft.cfg analysis.. the INLET
> AREA plays a BIG role in multiplying 1507 Mass Flow table. It explains
> the significant difference in the performance between PW
> and RR sims. THIS NEEDS to be LOOKED AT more carefully!!
>
>
> Compare: (<) 757-200 Northwest NC - PW\Aircraft.cfg (14398 bytes)
> with: (>) 757-200 American - RR\Aircraft.cfg (15615 bytes)
>
> 128,133c128,133
> < bypass_ratio = 6.00
> < inlet_area = 33.5757 <<< important data
> < rated_N2_rpm = 29920.0
> < static_thrust = 43734.0
> < afterburner_available =0
> < reverser_available =1
> ---
>> bypass_ratio = 4.36
>> inlet_area = 51.250 <<< important data
>> rated_N2_rpm = 29920.0
>> static_thrust = 43500.0
>> afterburner_available = 0
>> reverser_available = 1
>
>
> Bypass ratio hasn't been found to have an effect.. static thrust is
> from MFG's data sheet. Rated N2 RPM is high but has no real effect..
> more like 12,000 rpm IRL?
>
>
> ..can we fly it now?? :-))
>
>
> -Gregory
>
>