will AMD bury Intel ?

I have now been buying AMD based systems almost exclusively for a couple of years now. Both my home systems and the systems I purchase for the company. Have yet to find flaws with there new systems. Yes the older ones had trouble with clocking and the such, but since the Xp chips came out no issues here. Though Intel will not die off completely (there are still a lot of AOHellian users out there that do not know the difference between a CPU and a System unit) they will continue to lose market share as large PC manufactures like HP continue to offer AMD in new systems. Intel is a frog in a pot of warm water on a stove now, they haven't realized over the last few years someone has cranked up the temp. And the water will soon start to boil. If they want to survive they need to drastically cut the costs to the end user. Myself cannot justify 20% more for a name that use to represent the class of the processor manufactures

_________________
http://www.mento.ro

What the hell are you talking about? Here's some advice for you:

Roll away the rock that's been trapping you in your cave for the last 3 months.

Intel is far from being "buried" by AMD right now. Have you heard of Conroe? Signs point to the Core 2 line as being the Intel godsend that regains the crown from AMD.

As for any one company completely destroying the other...

WHY would you want that? Monopolies are bad news for the consumer. (That's you and me, by the way.)

Also, this is probably the worst first post of any member of the forumz. You do realize that you're gonna get burnt, don't you?

To be fair, the AMD desktop chips are more expensive than the Intel chips today (but a lot of that is Intel selling off old Pentium 4/D stock to make way for the Core 2.) AMD Turion notebooks are generally a little less expensive than Intel Pentium M/Core Solo + Duo, but I don't think the price difference is all in the CPU. I bet it is a combination of CPU, chipset, graphics, and NICs. Intel makes their money off of selling an all-in-one package (Centrino) for more than it would otherwise cost if you had NVIDIA, ATI, SIS, and VIA making chipsets, NVIDIA, ATI, and S3 doing graphics, and a whole host of people making NICs.

Intel's NetBurst chips certainly are furnaces, but the Pentium M and Core Solo + Duo aren't. They have a lower clock speed and better throttling than the P4/PD series do. So the thermal issues should be behind them unless they get back in the GHz war and can't keep shrinking dies. I think that would actually be more AMD's problem unless 65nm comes sooner rather than later.

Bad choice of topic...uh-oh, time to run...the mob with flaming torches is fast approaching!

Neither AMD or Intel are going any where...please, the desktop market is an oligopoly now let alone one burying the other...personally, I'd like to see another name in the game...whatever happened to the Cell Processor? That paired with HyperTransport would make for some amazing systems!

I was just teasing you

Anyway this topic is not going anywhere. By the way, I would like to see what was his first post 8O

Uhh, I seriously hope you aren't the IT coordinator for your company, and if you are, I feel for them, since you don't seem to have a clue of what is going on in the world, nor how this business works.

As for your Question, NOT A CHANCE, and I am one of the most unbiased people here.

Enjoy the flames buddy, because you just made yourself a " frog in a pot of warm water on a stove now", and you just cranked up the temperature on yourself.

lol, amd burying intel... thats actually pretty funny...


no offence, but no matter how much amd tries to bury intel within the next couple of months, intels gonna eat it all up with conroe and spit it back right at them...


not saying im an intel fan boy or nething, but right now, intel's looking pretty well in doing their job

Ouch, that stings

Come on, Action Man! Why would anyone want to bog down the forumz with anything as irrelevant as substantiated facts? This is a place where anyone can come up with great topic title like "Will AMD bury Intel" and then commence to utilize such great analogies as "Intel is a frog in a pot of warm water on a stove." I mean, come on! Who wants to hear a bunch of statistical information or logical arguments when we have such pearls of wisdom falling like mana from Noob Heaven?

I agree with the poster! I think AMD will bury something!! :-)

They will be burying the bodies of their dead when they start laying people off to still show profit for the next couple of quarters. (see, I can make unsubstantiated comments too) :-)

OK now everyone join in!!

DaBig,

I almost cried when I read your post, It almost reminded me of a chick flick I saw once:

Intel to AMD "You complete me" :-)

Hey, crimir. You've been strangely silent throughout this whole thread. That's not because you posted an inflammatory thread on purpose just to pi$$ people off, is it? Naaaahhh, of course not. What am I thinking?

LOL, yea I know what you mean.

But cmon, the only reason these two companies are at each others throats is because they keep exchanging blows, none of these two companies is going anywhere. And if they do, we'll pay dearly for it.

Check out the financials for them for the last 5 years, I dont see close to being buried anywhere. Did AMD have better performing chips? You bet. Did it stop Intel from being profitable? No.

AMD will bury Intel like Khruschev buried Kennedy.

The poster didn't say anything after he posted this because he's in a pot and it's getting hot so he needs to be silent or the trolls will heat it up. Sh!t it rhythms

It rhythms?

I don't think its my name lol

I don't think its my name lol

Ok man can you spit some more dope rhymes!

I am just saying it rhymes, and FU for the "dope" word.

Yo dont diss me homeboy or i might get a few of my homies and come a blastin on yo ass!





J/k

I dont want to ruin your day, but the frog you were talking about is AMD.

If anyone is going to bury anyone else, it will be Intel burying AMD, you can be pretty sure about that, but noone will get buried in this business.

this is kinda fun, but anyway. Again we don't want AMD to bury Intel or the otherway around, it's VERY VERY bad for consumer, we will be forced to pay all the high price for a damn CPU and no choice to choose from. F no!!!, I hope the one that started the thread did not commit suicide after reading the posts.... since no one agrees with him

this is great someone wich doesn't have the minimu of information just reaches here and goes at a post like this, dear dear ... big mistake, just spend 5 minutes reading some articles about both companies and you'll see that those two are side by side now on thecnology, everybody is waiting for conroe and waiting for AMD response to it wich will be even a better chip wich is good for us better tech at lower prices

is so silent because is not boiling in water , right now is frying in a pan lollol

Ycon you are my arch enemy i hate you so much cause you cant accept reality.When k8 was owning prescott you were dillusional then when k8 owned the 955 ee you were defending it so much but now with conroe you are dissing the old architecture cause you know that intel is on top now just like amd was on top before but wait what if k8l coems out and owns conroe? Listen you are a biased little intel troll that only posts here for his paycheck leave now and stop pissin everyone off with your intel trolling.