It will be interesting to see whether or not these are layoffs or "redeployments", as Intel has done in the past. For those concerned that Intel is going to be cutting their engineering departments, don't. It is very, very rare for a company who depends soley on R&D to maintain competitiveness to lay off engineers, regardless of how poorly they are doing (and Intel isn't doing very badly.) Most likely it will have more to do with marketing, management, production, etc. There are plenty of places to trim the fat without digging into the engineering department.
That said, I know I shouldn't do this because it's not the place, but I can't stand blabbering idiots like Alpha_Magnum. For anyone to actually believe what he writes is riduclous, and I just want to clarify it. (IAAE - I Am An Economist.. or at least majored in it
) First of all, yes, there are some major macroecnomic problems that the US is facing with high government deficits and trade deficits. And there are major economic engines truly competing with the US now - China in particular, as well as some other East Asian nations. That being said.. most of what was said is retarded.
First of all, with the war, yea, it's a pain in the butt, but it did what people wanted. Kickstart the economy. It's well known that deficit spending by the government can transiently help the economy. Either by war, or social spending programs. Second of all, energy prices are a problem, but solutions are being found. As peak oil comes and goes, the free market will find solutions. There may be an economic transistion, but it isn't going to crash the markets. I wish the US government (and other world governments, for that matter) would do more to help end energy woes (there
are solutions), but they aren't, and we'll have to deal with that.
As far as the crashing dollar.. good god, what do people want? Democrats want protectionism, and Republicans want free market competition. A weak dollar should be considered the ideal situation. A weak dollar means that foriegn products cost more in US markets, which is technically a form of protectionism. A weak dollar also means that US products are more competitive abroad, which helps the US compete in world markets. Economics 101. Mind you, a weak dollar does indicate that there are macroecnomic woes, but I can assure you that the "people in charge" have no problem with a weak dollar. Why do you think China keeps their currency artifically low by pegging it to the US dollar? It helps their economy.
Rising food costs and food shortages? I don't even know how to respond to that one. You mean in SS-Africa? And rising precious metal costs? Oh god, no! Invesstor speculation means the world is coming to an end. And wait, what? Your 7th point conflicts with point 5.
And finally, the GDP has been growing at a healthy rate for the past 3 years. Technically, only a single quarter in 2001 could even be considered a recession (where the GDP growth was lower than the rate of inflation). Q1 of '06 actually showed amazing growth of 5.3%. So yea, let me tell you, the economy is already in a downward spiral.
Sorry for responding to flamebait, and I feel retarded for doing it, especially on a forum about hardware, but I just can't stand it.