Would a 550w PSU support my new system...
AMD X2 3800+ OC's to 2.7GHz
1024 MB RAM
250GB DiamondMax HD
XFX 7900GT 256MB
AMD X2 3800+ OC's to 2.7GHz
1024 MB RAM
250GB DiamondMax HD
XFX 7900GT 256MB
Would a 550w PSU support my new system...
AMD X2 3800+ OC's to 2.7GHz
1024 MB RAM
250GB DiamondMax HD
XFX 7900GT 256MB
550 is overkill.
450 is more than adequate.
Whaaa?? No. 350W would be bare minumum, ONLY if the power supply is a high quality, top brand. 450W would be more than enough, providing the PSU is very good. More W doesn't mean anything if the PSU is from a dollar store.550 W for the AMD X 3800 + is a bare mnimum I would recommend.
Would a 550w PSU support my new system...
AMD X2 3800+ OC's to 2.7GHz
1024 MB RAM
250GB DiamondMax HD
XFX 7900GT 256MB
I don't care what anyone here says, I've seen good 350's run everything but SLI'd systems. If they are solid I don't give a **** what the ratings are, they will run fine. Everyone seems to overrate the output of ps's, the quality is what counts.
Would a 550w PSU support my new system...
AMD X2 3800+ OC's to 2.7GHz
1024 MB RAM
250GB DiamondMax HD
XFX 7900GT 256MB
What the hell are you smoking?
A stock X2 3800+ consumes 65w of power.
A stock X2 4800+ consumes 96w of power.
A X2 3800+ OC'ed to 2.7GHz will probably consume 115w of power.
CPU power consumption chart.
An overclocked 7900GT will consume around 57w of power. This chart shows the EVGA e-GeForce 7900 GT CO SuperClocked consuming ... of pow
First off, don't quote long posts like that, it's annoying.
Second, settle down, you are wrong, deal with it.
Many, many real life experiences have led me to the same conclusion, a high quality 300-400 watt supply will EASILY handle any non SLI load, search for my name and you will see a post that has "How much crap can you run off a 300 watt ps" or something like that. Plenty of people have done it and will continue to do so. If you want to overpay for unnecessary equipment fine, but don't give bad info to other users.
A buddy of mine just built a dual opty with 4 gig ram, 4 wd raptors and ati x1900xt and he's running it off a fortran 400watt ps that hardly gets warm.
A buddy of mine just built a dual opty with 4 gig ram, 4 wd raptors and ati x1900xt and he's running it off a fortran 400watt ps that hardly gets warm.
Uh, it's not that noisy actually, you can hear the dvd spin up over the noise of the fans for christ sake. I'd say uper 40db range at most. Good case and 120mm fans keeps it quite.
Cheaper than a much larger ps too.
sounds like.upper 40db
sounds like.Dude, you just said that system would be too loud, now you say it's quite, what are you smoking?????
Read one more time and try to understand correctlybefore you rant!
By the way, I used to design SPL and SQL systems for competition vehicles, I know what upper 40db
How many a$$holes do you have pcrig? .
So what for this noise is for?
You see you can rant but is it worth it?
You know the diference between a real man and the boy is only the age of his toy!
extreme overclocking
What you are trying to prove that your PC is hauling like a diesel engine?
All Major BRAND PCs and laptops between 1995 and 2005 had underdesigned PSU for at least 35% ! stalling all the time when you at most need the PC - You need that 30% reserve for proper operation !
I have mixed feelings about adjustable voltages. First off, a solid power supply shouldn't need to have it's voltages adjusted. There's the argument that the adjustment can "help overclocking RAM," but the adjustments an only be made so high and one has to keep in mind that there's more than RAM running off of the 3.3V rail.
So what for this noise is for?
You see you can rant but is it worth it?
You know the diference between a real man and the boy is only the age of his toy!
extreme overclocking
What you are trying to prove that your PC is hauling like a diesel engine?
All Major BRAND PCs and laptops between 1995 and 2005 had underdesigned PSU for at least 35% ! stalling all the time when you at most need the PC - You need that 30% reserve for proper operation !
Thus, the most correct measure of hard drive heating is the electric power it consumes. But power consumption of hard drives is also important for us because power saving in modern computers is becoming an issue of primary concern. Power consumption of processors and video cards is growing, a couple of dozens of Watts in a hard drive against these nearly-hundred-Watt ovens does not seem so critical. But it depends: in case of a low end PSU (250-300 W), an additional hard drive (or even the simplest RAID) may result in the necessity to upgrade a power supply unit to a more powerful one. Besides, no one abolished the problem of high start-up power consumption – for example, the plain Barracuda 7200.8 may draw up to 2.5A from the +12 V line at start-up. Add 3 W drawn from +5 V to get the peak start-up power consumption of 33 W! What if there are two or three such drives in a system? In this case you should play safe and take a PSU at least by 100-150 W more powerful than processor+video+motherboard require. Food for thought.
RAM runs off of the 3.3v rail, so it's power consumption can be excluded from the 12v rail power calculation.
From jonnyGURU:
I have mixed feelings about adjustable voltages. First off, a solid power supply shouldn't need to have it's voltages adjusted. There's the argument that the adjustment can "help overclocking RAM," but the adjustments an only be made so high and one has to keep in mind that there's more than RAM running off of the 3.3V rail.
550W should be more than enough. OK, I've said my piece for now... pcrig flame on.
-mcg
I said that is a minimum I would recommend! I like a little overhead and I would use a litle higher Power Factor and reserve sizing psu.550W should be more than enough
Really?
Read your own soiurces before you rant!
and the most important try to understand!
Thus, the most correct measure of hard drive heating is the electric power it consumes. But power consumption of hard drives is also important for us because power saving in modern computers is becoming an issue of primary concern. Power consumption of processors and video cards is growing, a couple of dozens of Watts in a hard drive against these nearly-hundred-Watt ovens does not seem so critical. But it depends: in case of a low end PSU (250-300 W), an additional hard drive (or even the simplest RAID) may result in the necessity to upgrade a power supply unit to a more powerful one. Besides, no one abolished the problem of high start-up power consumption – for example, the plain Barracuda 7200.8 may draw up to 2.5A from the +12 V line at start-up. Add 3 W drawn from +5 V to get the peak start-up power consumption of 33 W! What if there are two or three such drives in a system? In this case you should play safe and take a PSU at least by 100-150 W more powerful than processor+video+motherboard require. Food for thought.
Barracuda 7200.8 may draw up to 2.5A from the +12 V line at start-up.
All you've said below is only CRAP!
RAM runs off of the 3.3v rail, so it's power consumption can be excluded from the 12v rail power calculation.
From jonnyGURU:
I have mixed feelings about adjustable voltages. First off, a solid power supply shouldn't need to have it's voltages adjusted. There's the argument that the adjustment can "help overclocking RAM," but the adjustments an only be made so high and one has to keep in mind that there's more than RAM running off of the 3.3V rail.