penguin1

Distinguished
Jun 10, 2006
290
0
18,780
intel7Chip.jpg


lmao... just imagine if it exist. 8O
 

godman

Distinguished
Jun 2, 2006
665
0
18,980
if that were a real cpu then the quad core intel conroe (kentsifeld ) would totally own it, it would be cooler too :wink: and use less power :lol: well i guessit would anyway
...lol
 

pat

Expert
Isn't Intel supposed to be at 10 Ghz and more now??? It seems that they announced that some years ago, with netburst..

You can now go back to your masturbation time with your stupid picture..

Bring ycon too ..
 

K8MAN

Distinguished
Apr 1, 2005
839
0
18,980
im sorry this is SPAM.

also Intel Pentium 7 would require liquid notrogen to cool properly. or it would over heat
Is it prescott?

Yes dvdpiddy but it's an enhanced prescott modified to 50 piplines and it put out over 200 watt's of heat/core. Now sick em' boy :wink:
 

penguin1

Distinguished
Jun 10, 2006
290
0
18,780
It wouldn't overheat with a good CPU architecture.

@ OP
Next time, post crap like this in the "Other" section, not here.

my bad. I'm still quite fresh to this forum sorry!!

Anyway, i think that pic is super old.. probably made when intel first relesased Pentium 4. So ya prescott.
 

phaxmohdem

Distinguished
Mar 11, 2006
31
0
18,530
Anyway, i think that pic is super old.. probably made when intel first relesased Pentium 4. So ya prescott.

Just FYI, When Intel FIRST released the P4 CPU it was based on the Willamette core.... Then they updated the P4's with the Northwood Core, THEN at the end of its run the Prescott.... Prescott is the last iteration of the P4 chip not the first ;)
 

dvdpiddy

Splendid
Feb 3, 2006
4,764
0
22,780
im sorry this is SPAM.

also Intel Pentium 7 would require liquid notrogen to cool properly. or it would over heat
Is it prescott?

Yes dvdpiddy but it's an enhanced prescott modified to 50 piplines and it put out over 200 watt's of heat/core. Now sick em' boy :wink: Really? Thank goodness it's only 50 and not a 100.

Figures you'd like it.
When Ycon saw that pic he locked his door and brought out the lube. :lol:
 

IcY18

Distinguished
May 1, 2006
1,277
0
19,280
Isn't Intel supposed to be at 10 Ghz and more now??? It seems that they announced that some years ago, with netburst..

You can now go back to your masturbation time with your stupid picture..

Bring ycon too ..

that was an example when running on manufactured diamond transistors that can take the heat...
 

Mex

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2005
479
0
18,780
You live in Antarctica? The last thing we need is for the ice caps to melt.

Just FYI, When Intel FIRST released the P4 CPU it was based on the Willamette core.... Then they updated the P4's with the Northwood Core, THEN at the end of its run the Prescott.... Prescott is the last iteration of the P4 chip not the first
FYI, the last iteration of the P4 was Cedar Mill.
 

turpit

Splendid
Feb 12, 2006
6,373
0
25,780
Isn't Intel supposed to be at 10 Ghz and more now??? It seems that they announced that some years ago, with netburst..

You can now go back to your masturbation time with your stupid picture..

Bring ycon too ..


Yes, and according to Bill Gates, we still didnt need more than 4MB of RAM and 56K of cache. So much for predictions...
 

49ers540

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2006
244
0
18,680
Isn't Intel supposed to be at 10 Ghz and more now??? It seems that they announced that some years ago, with netburst..

You can now go back to your masturbation time with your stupid picture..

Bring ycon too ..

Intel would have been at 10Ghz but you AMD fanboy cry foul and complains about heat. No worries, you should be able to overclock Intel future products to 10Ghz where as AMD can't. :p
 

Ycon

Distinguished
Feb 1, 2006
1,359
0
19,280
Well, then you can go and kiss AMD for their idea of having processors work at 20 GHz (was it 20 or 10?)
LOL, loser :lol:
 

derek2006

Distinguished
May 19, 2006
751
0
18,990
Isn't Intel supposed to be at 10 Ghz and more now??? It seems that they announced that some years ago, with netburst..

You can now go back to your masturbation time with your stupid picture..

Bring ycon too ..

Intel would have been at 10Ghz but you AMD fanboy cry foul and complains about heat. No worries, you should be able to overclock Intel future products to 10Ghz where as AMD can't. :p Chips can not scale over 10 Ghz using silicon. Becouse of energy leakage or something like that. But currently scientist are able to make flawless man made diamonds that will be used in computer chips in possibly 2011. It should scale to 81 Ghz.
 

quantumsheep

Distinguished
Dec 10, 2005
2,341
0
19,790
Intel 5 years ago show cased a 1THZ Cpu (1000GHZ), which i do believe was running on sililcon. So with todays technology it should be more than possible to reach speeds well in excess of 10ghz.