Consumer reports printer reviews

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

"Dan G" <Dan@xxxx.com> wrote in message
news:nOCdnX3sBOvenc_fRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> This year's printer reports just came out. There are 4 PIXMA models in the
> top 10. Oddly, they did not include the 3000 in the review, but the 4000 is
> their "best buy". Once again they are looking at the cost per page for both
> text and photos, as well as print quality and features.

An interesting spin in the manner of the cute little book "How to lie with
statistics". Another cut at the same data would be "HP takes top spot and five
of the top six in printer reviews".

- Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

"Bob Headrick" <bobh@proaxis.com>
wrotenews:115ec83obugigfb@corp.supernews.com:

>
> "Dan G" <Dan@xxxx.com> wrote in message
> news:nOCdnX3sBOvenc_fRVn-gw@comcast.com...
>> This year's printer reports just came out. There are 4 PIXMA models in
>> the top 10. Oddly, they did not include the 3000 in the review, but the
>> 4000 is their "best buy". Once again they are looking at the cost per
>> page for both text and photos, as well as print quality and features.
>
> An interesting spin in the manner of the cute little book "How to lie
> with statistics". Another cut at the same data would be "HP takes top
> spot and five of the top six in printer reviews".
>
> - Bob Headrick, not speaking for my employer HP
>
>
>

Cutting out all bullshit, Canon and HP are all in the top and Lexmark and
Epson are almost all on the bottom.

Just that simple.

--
---Mapanari---

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

measekite <measekite@yahoo.com> wrotenews:gB06e.18575$FN4.16470
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com:


>
> So why did CR give them a poor rating? =-O
>

A years subscription can be had for around $18 .

--
---Mapanari---