I'm going to be setting up a 3-disk array on my new pc... which flavour of Raid would be best Raid 1 or Raid 5?
How are you going to set up raid 1 on 3 drives? 3 identical mirrors? 2 mirrors and a hot spare? Either way wasting 66% of your usable space?
Raid 5 will cost you only 33% of your drive space, but (as I have just read) if you are using chipset based raid like nforce4 the raid 5 performance is pathetic.
You could set up a 2 disk raid 1 for your critical data, and have a single disk for other stuff.
Raid 1 is what i'm using in my current array and there's ah heck-all fault tolerance there...
Like the idea of Raid 5 but 33% space loss on a 3 drive system is pretty hectic...
i would put 2 disks in a raid0, with os and apps, and the third one for backup.I'm going to be setting up a 3-disk array on my new pc... which flavour of Raid would be best Raid 1 or Raid 5?
i would put 2 disks in a raid0, with os and apps, and the third one for backup.
although mirroring is a easier way to secure your data, if you have problems with one of the disks or even the controller will be a little pain in the a55 to recover.
my personal opinion, by the way
i would put 2 disks in a raid0, with os and apps, and the third one for backup.
although mirroring is a easier way to secure your data, if you have problems with one of the disks or even the controller will be a little pain in the a55 to recover.
my personal opinion, by the way
uhhhh yeah, i know exactly how each raid mode works.
but, from the original post, the question is a little bit vague. he asked which would be better, but he didnt say if it was speed, security or both. As he asked between raid 1 and 5, i supposed he wanted speed and security.
So, my advice was given towards that option... raid0 (speed0) and a second disk for security.
Like i said, mirrored disks offer a little bit of a hassle to unexperienced people. As the OP had a doubt between these two modes i belive he doesnt have much experience with this kind of setup, that's why he asked for help....