• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

Latest Reviews & Articles

Cyberpower’s Gamer Dragon: Can AMD Bring The Game?

Cyberpower’s Gamer Dragon: Can AMD Bring The Game?

Cyberpower sent us a factory-overclocked Phenom II X4 955 system wielding two Radeon HD 4890 cards in CrossFire. We pit the formidable rig against our previous System Builder Marathon Core i7 machine to see if AMD can deliver a viable gaming alternative. Read more

1.5 TB Low-Power HDDs: Green Gets Big

1.5 TB Low-Power HDDs: Green Gets Big

The latest 2 TB hard drives are still expensive, but 1.5 TB disks provide low power consumption at a better cost-to-capacity ratio. We look at offerings from Samsung and Western Digital to determine the value of taking a step down from the flagships. Read more

ADVERTORIAL Microsoft's BPOS: Q&A for Skeptics

ADVERTORIAL Microsoft's BPOS: Q&A for Skeptics

When a new paradigm like cloud computing or a new platform like Microsoft’s Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS) comes along, it’s smart to ask tough questions. Read more

MSI Eclipse Plus: Does nForce 200 Boost 3-Way SLI?

MSI Eclipse Plus: Does nForce 200 Boost 3-Way SLI?

With 36 lanes of PCIe 2.0, 3-way SLI could be the X58 chipset’s biggest challenge. If that turns out to be true, is Nvidia’s nForce 200 controller hub, which multiplexes the platform's connectivity, a solution? We compare three configurations to find out. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles

VoIP over ISDN

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

 

For me the only option to get something faster than dial-up is ISDN.
I know, it's not great and it's expensive. Be as it may, I have to
do with ISDN. I am wondering if it is possible to get VoIP service
over the ISDN connection. With ISDN I get the bandwidth associated
with the two B channels (128K) which in theory would be plenty
for good voice traffic.
However, reading the offerings from various VoIP services, they only
mention DSL or cable as suitable VoIP avenues. Does any of you guys
have VoIP working on an ISDN connection?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

 

Why not use one of the B-Channels for voice? Most ISDN routers can
automatically add and drop a B Channel from your data connection when it is
needed for voice.

I have some Cisco 804 ISDN routers with 2 pots ports available for sale at a
good price if you are interested.

Mike Schumann

"Leo" <no_spam_leo@velocitus.net> wrote in message
news:118pdto74q8cu8a@corp.supernews.com...
> For me the only option to get something faster than dial-up is ISDN.
> I know, it's not great and it's expensive. Be as it may, I have to
> do with ISDN. I am wondering if it is possible to get VoIP service
> over the ISDN connection. With ISDN I get the bandwidth associated
> with the two B channels (128K) which in theory would be plenty
> for good voice traffic.
> However, reading the offerings from various VoIP services, they only
> mention DSL or cable as suitable VoIP avenues. Does any of you guys
> have VoIP working on an ISDN connection?
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

 

Leo <no_spam_leo@velocitus.net> wrote:
> For me the only option to get something faster than dial-up is ISDN.
> I know, it's not great and it's expensive. Be as it may, I have to
> do with ISDN. I am wondering if it is possible to get VoIP service
> over the ISDN connection. With ISDN I get the bandwidth associated
> with the two B channels (128K) which in theory would be plenty
> for good voice traffic.
> However, reading the offerings from various VoIP services, they only
> mention DSL or cable as suitable VoIP avenues. Does any of you guys
> have VoIP working on an ISDN connection?

Yes, there should be no reason why this can't work. I think the reason you
don't hear much about it is that ISDN has become quite uncommon most places.

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 36 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
Latest photos: Queens Day in Amsterdam; the Grand Canyon; Amman, Jordan

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

 

> Why not use one of the B-Channels for voice? Most ISDN routers can
> automatically add and drop a B Channel from your data connection when it
> is needed for voice.
>
> I have some Cisco 804 ISDN routers with 2 pots ports available for sale at
> a good price if you are interested.
>
> Mike Schumann
>
Yes, the B channels and the pot ports can be directly used for voice,
only however under the supervision/billing of the Telco (as far as I know
....)
thus negating the price advantage of the VoIP scheme.

Leo

Reply to Leo

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

 

"Miguel Cruz" <mnc@admin.u.nu> wrote in message
news:seOdnTpUdpvZeRHfRVn-rw@speakeasy.net...
> Leo <no_spam_leo@velocitus.net> wrote:
> > For me the only option to get something faster than dial-up is ISDN.
> > I know, it's not great and it's expensive. Be as it may, I have to
> > do with ISDN. I am wondering if it is possible to get VoIP service
> > over the ISDN connection. With ISDN I get the bandwidth associated
> > with the two B channels (128K) which in theory would be plenty
> > for good voice traffic.
> > However, reading the offerings from various VoIP services, they only
> > mention DSL or cable as suitable VoIP avenues. Does any of you guys
> > have VoIP working on an ISDN connection?
>
> Yes, there should be no reason why this can't work. I think the reason you
> don't hear much about it is that ISDN has become quite uncommon most
places.
>
> miguel
> --
> Hit The Road! Photos from 36 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
> Latest photos: Queens Day in Amsterdam; the Grand Canyon; Amman, Jordan

What is ISDN replaced with?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

 

Orc General <orc_general@hotmailNOSPEM.com> wrote:
> "Miguel Cruz" <mnc@admin.u.nu> wrote:
>> Leo <no_spam_leo@velocitus.net> wrote:
>>> However, reading the offerings from various VoIP services, they only
>>> mention DSL or cable as suitable VoIP avenues. Does any of you guys
>>> have VoIP working on an ISDN connection?
>>
>> Yes, there should be no reason why this can't work. I think the reason
>> you don't hear much about it is that ISDN has become quite uncommon most
>> places.
>
> What is ISDN replaced with?

2B+D is squeezed out by DSL and cable modems.

PRI isn't going anywhere, I should have clarified.

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 36 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
Latest photos: Queens Day in Amsterdam; the Grand Canyon; Amman, Jordan

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.voice-over-ip (More info?)

 

In Qwest territory, if you have ISDN, voice channels are a freebee. You
still have to pay long distance charges (you can use any carrier, just like
on an analog line), but local calls are free. Also, the standard price
includes most options you can think of (Caller ID, Call Transfer, Call
Conference, etc....). It turns out that the ISDN pricing is less than 2
business lines, so it's a relatively good deal just for voice.

Mike Schumann

"Leo" <no_spam_leo@velocitus.net> wrote in message
news:118qu9rensv2825@corp.supernews.com...
>> Why not use one of the B-Channels for voice? Most ISDN routers can
>> automatically add and drop a B Channel from your data connection when it
>> is needed for voice.
>>
>> I have some Cisco 804 ISDN routers with 2 pots ports available for sale
>> at a good price if you are interested.
>>
>> Mike Schumann
>>
> Yes, the B channels and the pot ports can be directly used for voice,
> only however under the supervision/billing of the Telco (as far as I know
> ...)
> thus negating the price advantage of the VoIP scheme.
>
> Leo
>

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > General Networking > VPN, VoIP, Video Conferencing, Remote Connections > VoIP over ISDN
Go to:

There are 796 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links