First and foremost,
Happy New Years, Hope we all have a good 2007 -
looking at March/April [personally adjusted]
forecasts we are going to have one of the best years in IT for a long time. Sure everyone is almost sick of hearing these two subjects though.
We got 1 metre of hail (yes - hail, not snow) on some main suburbern roads down here in Canberra (which is North of Melbourne FYI), just a few hours before New Years, so put quite a hamper on the celebrations, but they felt 'hollow' anyway. Like... a random Tuesday with meaningless Fireworks (7 minutes of, nothing large scale).
Hehehahaha, you can read right through my [medium term] plans.
I am considering getting a web-site going, something more central than the 3 links under my sig, and making the image a link too.
What file size do you think is acceptable for a 468 x 60 banner anyway ?
Would it matter if it was a 10 or 60 second loop (eg: If it was 60 seconds, would the acceptable file size, be 6 times as large when compared to a 10 second loop, in your opinion [and anyone else that feels like posting]).
I wasn't even aware that banner sizes had standards until the other week... well I was, but
768 x 64 seams (or seamed) more realistic for 800 x 600 (worst case) viewing than 468 x 60. (Which is the res I made the current sig in, then had to bilinear resampled it down, distorting the aspect ratio in the process).
Learning process I guess, It's always the more basic stuff that trips me up, which is nice because it makes it easy to fix.
Ironically I've learnt more in the Test Posts section of the Forumz in 2 weeks than a typical quarter spent (ed: wasted) in the CPU section.
Isn't exactly the sort of thing I can do overnight, as I am no DreamWeaver MX guru. However some software that was demonstrated to me on a Mac has pretty much convinced me to become at least 30% Apple Mac user (23" TFT, but only attached to PCs for now
), and 50-70% 'typical-ish' PC User (and up to 20% other, eg: PlayStation 3 [maybe], Sun SPARC, PowerPC, Solaris, Linux, etc).
Can avoid vendor lock-in and just pick the best of any 'sphere' of IT to meet my needs (cost, time/speed, easy of use or maximum functionality / tweakability).
... getting back to the point though, with the software demonstrated what could take me a month (as a spare time + beginner) in DreamWeaver MX would take me a weekend with iWork (I think it was). Then it can be tweaked in DreamWeaver sort of like post-processing photography. That alone makes it worth the extra cost IMHO - because a hobby shouldn't be about wasting time, it should be about investing it.
I am not easily impressed by software these days either, when it comes to software I expect it to be production quality (not the 'current' definition of production quality - which high-school students can better for 'free'). Good, In that it should mirror hardware and minimize bugs and annoyances before being sold to the masses. It is easier & cheaper to make good software than good hardware, Good not always meaning high performance in every case either, yet so few software companies remember how to make 'Good' software.
My PC instinct hinted towards a BSD Kernel, but with a nice GUI, and high quality video drivers (which most Linux / BSD distributions lack). Mac OS X 10.5 and 10.6 simply blew me away when I saw an 'experienced' Apple user demonstrate them.
eg: Load every application installed (which included heaps of apps not in the standard offering in this case) at once, with just 1 GB of RAM.
No 'Your pagefile is growing, You may get some out of memory errors while this is happening' warning messages.
No 'excessive, and needless really, paging to/from disk'
No 'massive slow down' when using more Virtual Memory than installed / available Physical memory.
The abilility to have a 'Tetris' style 'best fit' layout zoomed out of every 'window' visible.
GUI elements did not go 'all white/grey' while being paged to/from disk (I have no idea why Microsoft give the OS Disk Cache priority over the GUI elements when it comes to paging 'unused' data - fucking stupid design IMHO - always pissed me off).
A GUI that puts Windows 2K, XP, and Vista to shame
A task scheduler, and resource management (eg: GUI vs Disk Cache, Data vs Instructions, etc), that puts some Linux and Unix distributions to shame.
Highly responsive UI.
All the 'annoying things' that need manual setup are highly automated and easy to 'accidentally learn how to use correctly'. eg: System backups - which 96% of users don't keep.
Now I want to get a PC / Apple Mac hybrid setup going, even if it means 2 PCs, 1 Apple Mac, a KVM, a Logtiech G5 and/or MX518 and/or MX510 mice, Windows Digital Media Pro keyboard (which is certified for Mac OS X use), and one (to start with anyway) 23", 16:10, DVI, Cinema HD, Apple TFT display.
It has been so damn long since my computing was more pleasurable than painful, sometimes going so far as call counter-productive. Most of that has been related to (1) the quality of [Windows] software over the last 10 years getting worse every passing week, and (2) always using 2nd hand monitors that only meet 70% of my requirements, just at 15% the 'potential' cost for something nice.