Are you using Windows 7 (32) or (64)?
Tags:
Last response: in Windows 7
Are you using Windows 7 (32) or (64)
Total: 117 votes (19 blank votes)
- Windows 7 (32)
-
16 %
- Windows 7 (64)
-
85 %
Related ressources
- Changing 32 bit to 64 bit Windows 7 using a Win 7 installer from torrents - Forum
- Windows 7 Ult 64 Bit Installation While Using 32 Bit - Forum
- Windows 7 - using both 32 -bit and 64 -bit disks - Forum
- Windows 7--32 bit or 64 bit using DDR2 675 - Forum
- Using my OEM 32 bit key to install a 64 bit win 7 instead. - Forum
...There is no Emulation. Nor is it needed. The x64 standard includes everything in the x86 standard, and the Windows API's are the same as well. The 32 bit binaries run in native mode.
The only thing required is a little registry and path redirection magic, which is handled by WoW64 ("Windows on Windows", not the MMO)
{edit} Thanks for the rate down. And for whoever that was, please direct your attention to: http://windowshpc.net/Resources/Documents/64-bit%20Insi... Please note that 32 bit applications run in native mode, and WOW64 directs the file system and registry access to a set of modified 32 bit equivalents. In short: It Tricks 32 bit apps into believing they're running in 32 bit Windows.
Emulation is only required on an Itanium (IA64) system, because the binaries won't run. And I sincerely doubt that many Toms' readers/posters run Itanium servers.
The only thing required is a little registry and path redirection magic, which is handled by WoW64 ("Windows on Windows", not the MMO)
{edit} Thanks for the rate down. And for whoever that was, please direct your attention to: http://windowshpc.net/Resources/Documents/64-bit%20Insi... Please note that 32 bit applications run in native mode, and WOW64 directs the file system and registry access to a set of modified 32 bit equivalents. In short: It Tricks 32 bit apps into believing they're running in 32 bit Windows.
Emulation is only required on an Itanium (IA64) system, because the binaries won't run. And I sincerely doubt that many Toms' readers/posters run Itanium servers.
Yah - Build 7000 doesn't particularly like my 4870x2 either... 3D mode (gaming) with 2 24" monitors = hard locks. Swapping from DVI to HDMI connectors = No Joy. The 9.3 drivers haven't fixed it. Dutifully reported like a good beta tester.
I've thought of Torrenting one of the new builds, but the rumor mill says next month for the real RC and I have a Technet subscription. I'd rather use "official" bits if I can get them, so I'm going to wait a bit and only use 7 with the one monitor.
I've thought of Torrenting one of the new builds, but the rumor mill says next month for the real RC and I have a Technet subscription. I'd rather use "official" bits if I can get them, so I'm going to wait a bit and only use 7 with the one monitor.
Winly said:
i used Windows 7 32-Bit for a while, i dont have the hardware for 64 bit lol. 4 year old PC what do you expect lol. but it actually run smoother than Vista. i really loved it.If you're running a P4 chip made after 2004 then you shouldn't have any problems running the 64-bit Windows 7 beta. Everyone who can get the 64-bit one should get it, regardless of whether or not they need the extra RAM headroom. Gets a message out to the bigwigs that it's about damn time we've got a 64-bit OS solution that will actually work, as opposed to one that gets released and lags behind for quite a while in it's early life in terms of driver development (XP-64 and Vista-64 anyone?)
Win7 64 bit.
As for the person claiming it overheats their laptop? My laptop gets a longer battery life with 7 than with either Vista or XP. That would seem to imply that it is using less power, including the processor. Generally, components using less power produce less heat.
In other words, you're full of it.
As for the person claiming it overheats their laptop? My laptop gets a longer battery life with 7 than with either Vista or XP. That would seem to imply that it is using less power, including the processor. Generally, components using less power produce less heat.
In other words, you're full of it.
Running Build 7057 64-bit, and i'm loving it. The thing reboots to a usable desktop in sub 60seconds. Run way fewer processes then Vista. Fresh install with nothing installed it booted with 30 processes. Currently under full usage, two mozilla windows, media player, and WoW., and it's running 45 processes. Much better then a fully tweaked Vista 64-bit at 56 processes. Vista non-tweaked can pile up to 70+ processes, it's gross.
Wasted processes eh, s'funny my dad's xp machine only runs like 3 less processes then windows 7. To what benefit? To run a old almost unsupported, aging, decrepit OS.
efullenkamp94 said:
... windows 7 is dreadful... took it off my laptop because it overheats with all the wasted processes in it... XP!!!Wasted processes eh, s'funny my dad's xp machine only runs like 3 less processes then windows 7. To what benefit? To run a old almost unsupported, aging, decrepit OS.
I am running Window 7 64bit on two computers.
It is on my new Intel i7 920 desktop.
Currently running it as a dual boot - both partitions are Windows 7.
One for work and one for play
Also switched my Dell XPS laptop over to Windows 7.
It is dual boot with Windows Server 2008 on the other partition.
Windows 7 works really well and I will stay with it.
I just decided to renew my MSDN Pro subscription so that it will
cost me less in the end.
It is on my new Intel i7 920 desktop.
Currently running it as a dual boot - both partitions are Windows 7.
One for work and one for play
Also switched my Dell XPS laptop over to Windows 7.
It is dual boot with Windows Server 2008 on the other partition.
Windows 7 works really well and I will stay with it.
I just decided to renew my MSDN Pro subscription so that it will
cost me less in the end.
I currnetly dual boot both 32 and 64 and have no problems with either of them. I wish I had more Ram (3Gig) for the 64. Though the Memory Hog we know from Vista, seems to be taken car of. Thus making a efficient OS even with 40+ processes running. I have no complaints and all the builds get better with the small problems that i have come across. And yes it's great to know that your hdd's are all defragged automatically while you sleep. Unless you fell like watching the the passes, you still have that option too.
Reportedly from some friends of mine, 7068 fixed the dual monitor thing. Though I would think the people at Radeon would have posted some Beta drivers for that by now.
For those that don't have the hardware to run the full Ultimate edition, It is easier now (more than before) to change your settings either automatically or manually. That way you have a better experience with the OS.
Seems MS may have learned somthing from the early Vista flop. hmm...
Reportedly from some friends of mine, 7068 fixed the dual monitor thing. Though I would think the people at Radeon would have posted some Beta drivers for that by now.
For those that don't have the hardware to run the full Ultimate edition, It is easier now (more than before) to change your settings either automatically or manually. That way you have a better experience with the OS.
Seems MS may have learned somthing from the early Vista flop. hmm...
The "memory hog" reputation of Vista is a misconception... always has been and from the look of things, always will be. No matter how much truthful information is out there, people still continue to spread FUD. Oh well.
I guess I'll just have to be one of the few that is happy with the way Vista performs... instead of believing all the hype.
I guess I'll just have to be one of the few that is happy with the way Vista performs... instead of believing all the hype.
I'm running 64-bit RC (Build 7100) and it's terrific. I'll be upgrading to an SSD and reinstalling with the RTM version once the school term is finished.
I had to do a reinstall of my system and I accidentally grabbed the 32-bit disc. I ran my 12GB Core i7 920 system for a week on it before stumbling into the fact that I had less than 4GB of memory available... I didn't do any benchmarking, but I didn't notice any performance differences either.
harker99 said:
I wonder how many of these posters have run both versions on the same hardware and compared.Related ressources:
- ForumMy computer is 32 bit, need 64 bit to install windows 7
- ForumIs a 64 -bit Windows 7 quicker than 32 -bit in itself, as an OS?
- ForumCan i use 32 -bit antivirus over 64 -bit windows 7
- ForumInstall Windows 8 64 bit on Windows 7 32 bit – without CD
- ForumHow to change from 64 bit to 32 bit in windows7
- ForumHow to change windows 7 64 bit os to 32 bit?
- ForumRestore a disk image from Windows 7 32 -bit to Windows 7 64 -bit on a different ma
- ForumInstall Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit around a Vista 32 bit
- ForumInstall a 32 -bit Windows 7 OS to a 64 -bit Laptop
- ForumHow to change 32 -bit to 64 -bit in windows 7
- ForumUpgrade 32 bit windows 7 rc to 64 bit without formating
- ForumDownloading Files from 32 -bit Vista to 64 -bit Windows 7
- Forum"Reboot and select Proper boot device"
- ForumWindows 7 on a netbook
- ForumWindows 7 booting issue in XP machine
- More resources
Read discussions in other Windows 7 categories
!