Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory (
More info?)
Chriss is this purely for performance? using both drives will leave us
nothing for redundancy due to hardware failure.
thanks
"Chriss3 [MVP]" wrote:
> I recommend you to place the SYSVOL share at the operative system drive, and
> place the database and the transaction logfiles on the separate drive
> instead.
>
> --
> Regards
> Christoffer Andersson
> Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
>
> No email replies please - reply in the newsgroup
> ------------------------------------------------
>
http://www.chrisse.se - Active Directory Tips
>
> "panther3" <panther3@discussions.microsoft.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:6BE16A76-3297-44CF-9280-0222531F59D1@microsoft.com...
> > we are not so concenred with performance at this stage just putting
> > together
> > a recommend dc spec for our sites, we have two pysical scsi disks and
> > raid1,
> > I think we will go with a c: partition of 7-10GB and the remainder of the
> > disk approx 20GB to d: with sysvol moved to d:
> >
> >
> > "Jimmy Andersson [MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> If you thinking about Perf gains you won't get anything useful unless you
> >> have separate spindles.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> /Jimmy
> >> --
> >> Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice AB
> >> Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
> >> ---------- www.qadvice.com ----------
> >>
> >>
> >> "panther3" <panther3@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news
9B5BF8E-1684-47F0-AAA4-847DF4525641@microsoft.com...
> >> > Is there any need to have more than one disk partition for a domain
> >> > controller, ie: should we use the entire disk as c: or should we have a
> >> > c:
> >> > and d: partition? thanks in advance
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>