I just read the article on Memory speed vs. AMD memory clock compatiblity and now I'm totally confused about the speed divider. It seems to me that the X2 4000+ is the best deal because of the 1MB L2 Cache and the faster DDR2-800 Memory Clock, but I just bought matched DDR2 5400 675MHz Memory (really good deal) and based on what this article is saying, It doesn't look like the 5400 memory will give the 4000+ any advantage because its not 800MHz. Should I return the memory for Corsair 6400 (800MHz), buy the 4200+ chip with a closer memory clock compatibility, or stop over-analysing the data?
Any insight would be much appreciated
Thanks
That's nto actually how it works. Theoretically, the AM2 with ANY DDR2 should be at least as fast as 939. having low latency is what is best for Athlon. BTW, hurry if you want a 1MB chip they are disappearing as AMD is phasing them out.
Anyway, using 667 at CAS 4 or CAS 3 will give a small increase over slower 800 theoretically with AMDs IMC. No one has really done latency tests at 667 so it's hard to say, but looking at how 800 scales with latency, I would assume that 667 would be the same. Also, you're right the way A64 mem dividers work, odd multipliers produce a slightly lower speed, but there may not be much difference between 742 running at 4-3-4-9 and 800 running the same.
- off topic -
I'd like to see a comprehensive suite fo tsts at ALL the DDR2 speeds with the Sempron, TurionX2, X2, FX.