CPU clock spped slower than it should be
Last response: in CPUs
I have a AMD X2 4200+ 2.2Ghz CPU. I recently looked at my DxDiag report and it said that my CPU was ~1.0Ghz. Then I checked system properties and it said that it was 450Mhz! I restarted my PC. I checked another DxDiag report and it said ~2.2Ghz like it should. System properties said 991Mhz. I would close system properties and check it again and it would say 1.79Ghz. Close it and check it again and 991Mhz! All of this time it says that I have a AMD X2 4200+, but the spped is wrong.
What is going on. I have not noticed any system slow downs, but I havenot been gaming lately either.
What is going on. I have not noticed any system slow downs, but I havenot been gaming lately either.
More about : cpu clock spped slower
Related ressources
- CPU Slower than it should be/configuring BIOS - Forum
- Cpu spped - Forum
- EVGA GTX 460SC x2 SLI running slower than it should ? - Forum
- 8800GTX out of the box running slower than it should be? - Forum
- AMD FX-8150 performing slower than it should ? - Forum
yes dont disable it.
To confirm it is working, download CPU-Z and leave it open while you use the pc. You should see the processor's actual speed and watch it vary along with the CPU voltate core (V-core) adjust up and down according to the speed of the processor.
To enable it (or fix if not working to fix it) make sure you have the newest amd drivers (patch released last month) and make sure it is on in the BIOS AND turn it on in Windows XP. To do so go to power management and set it to "Minimal power management" and that should do it.
HideOut
To confirm it is working, download CPU-Z and leave it open while you use the pc. You should see the processor's actual speed and watch it vary along with the CPU voltate core (V-core) adjust up and down according to the speed of the processor.
To enable it (or fix if not working to fix it) make sure you have the newest amd drivers (patch released last month) and make sure it is on in the BIOS AND turn it on in Windows XP. To do so go to power management and set it to "Minimal power management" and that should do it.
HideOut
yes,cool n quiet seems to be the culprit for you.just disable it and your machine should read everything correctly.and to answer the person at the bottom,disabling cool n quiet will enable you to overclock like crazy.my understanding is that with cool n quiet enabled while overclocked,you will find major instability in your system when you are not using it for anything.if someone could confirm or deny this for me i would appreciate it.anyways disable it and you shoould be fine.goodluck.
EVGA NFORCE4 SLI READY BOARD
ATHLON X2 4400+
2X1 GIG SAMSUNG DDR400 IN DC MODE
520WATT PSU
7800GT VIDEO CARD
WD 300GIG HD
EVGA NFORCE4 SLI READY BOARD
ATHLON X2 4400+
2X1 GIG SAMSUNG DDR400 IN DC MODE
520WATT PSU
7800GT VIDEO CARD
WD 300GIG HD
You can OC with C&C enabled, depending on what you do. I have an opteron 170 (2.0 x 2x1mb L2) and its running at about 2.6ghz with C&C enabled. When less processing power is used or needed it downclocks 50% (drops to 5x multiplier) so in my case that is about 1.3ghz. The 1ghz mark is what they go down to (5x multi is lowest for them) but top speed depends on your proc, in your case 11x multi for 2.2ghz.
if you adjust your Vcore up or down manually you need to turn off cool and quiet, if you dont bump your vcore, you can safely leave it on.
On a mildly related note, download the newest AMD dual core update put out a day or two ago for proper CPU load balancing for your dual coare (amd or intel).
hide
if you adjust your Vcore up or down manually you need to turn off cool and quiet, if you dont bump your vcore, you can safely leave it on.
On a mildly related note, download the newest AMD dual core update put out a day or two ago for proper CPU load balancing for your dual coare (amd or intel).
hide
Nop is doesnt. But it DOES crank up the speed to full (at least it did it here) and have you ever played a High Defenition movie on your comp? You should try it and then hit ctrl+alt+del and look how much your cpu has to work. (here about 60%-70%) so this is enough to go to full speed again.
And a game like CS 1.6 has enough on my 1,21ghz but also it speeds up to 2,2ghz. So it does it pretty quickly.
And a game like CS 1.6 has enough on my 1,21ghz but also it speeds up to 2,2ghz. So it does it pretty quickly.
Quote:
Nop is doesnt. But it DOES crank up the speed to full (at least it did it here) and have you ever played a High Defenition movie on your comp? You should try it and then hit ctrl+alt+del and look how much your cpu has to work. (here about 60%-70%) so this is enough to go to full speed again. And a game like CS 1.6 has enough on my 1,21ghz but also it speeds up to 2,2ghz. So it does it pretty quickly.
Don't forget he's got a dual core. BTW, don't you have problems with CnQ enabled while overclocking, I've heared it around.
i dont know about dual core, never really looked into it. But if you know something about dual core, then your probably right because i dont know anything about it
And the reason i dont have problems with it is because my mobo (check my sig) doesnt let me increase the voltage on the vcore. So i have maxed out the HTT frequency on stock voltage. It now runs 244fsb on stock voltage. 244*9=2196mhz
Never have stability problems with it
so im happy with it.
And the reason i dont have problems with it is because my mobo (check my sig) doesnt let me increase the voltage on the vcore. So i have maxed out the HTT frequency on stock voltage. It now runs 244fsb on stock voltage. 244*9=2196mhz
Never have stability problems with it
so im happy with it. Quote:
i dont know about dual core, never really looked into it. But if you know something about dual core, then your probably right because i dont know anything about it
And the reason i dont have problems with it is because my mobo (check my sig) doesnt let me increase the voltage on the vcore. So i have maxed out the HTT frequency on stock voltage. It now runs 244fsb on stock voltage. 244*9=2196mhz
Never have stability problems with it
so im happy with it.The 3000+ is a beauty; I used to keep mine @ 239*9 ~ 2.15GHz (even 250*9 when I wanted the fastest renderings) but since I switched to a SATA drive I can nnot set the FSB to more than 224 (usually keep it 220) if I want the system ti detect i.
Quote:
So my OC to 2,2ghz is pretty good on stock voltage?But how come SATA is holding you OC back?
Edit: there are 2 models of the 3000+ right? One on 1,4V and one on 1,35V (dont know exactly), i have the 1,4V model.
The venice core has a voltage range between 1.45 & 1.55 (can not adjust it on my Asus A8V-MX bi it stays @ about 1.48-1.49).
Quote:
Why dont you wait on conroe? Like everybody does as i read so
.You can gain 10-20fps in games, i think thats amazing.
Don't care about games &FPS and haven't enough money/interest to get a top (dual core) CPU now and the 3800+ is the most rocking single core.
Who knows, after 1 year may think of a total upgrade.
Now, since you are a 3000+ overclocker, I just wanted to ask you something:
I don't play games on my PC, absolutely not, and the only reason why I overclock it to get lower render times; that's why even a 10% OC makes a difference to me. I have set myself to this not just because of the SATA bottleneck, I have also noticed that the southbridge chip also gets a bit hotter on higher OC levels; Do you happen to know what degree of negativity it brings to the motherboard. I will probably still use this system for a long time (even 3-4 years and want it to be totally efficient.
I don't play games on my PC, absolutely not, and the only reason why I overclock it to get lower render times; that's why even a 10% OC makes a difference to me. I have set myself to this not just because of the SATA bottleneck, I have also noticed that the southbridge chip also gets a bit hotter on higher OC levels; Do you happen to know what degree of negativity it brings to the motherboard. I will probably still use this system for a long time (even 3-4 years and want it to be totally efficient.
Quote:
Any component is effected by running faster, CPU, GPU, chipset, whatever.Right, but a heatspreader in my southbridge (like that of my onboard graphics) maybe would help me not shorten it's life (it's got a metallic topping and guess it's for that reason).
Maybe. Heat is only one factor that may effect electromigration, so keeping the heat as low as possible won't hurt.
Without a failure analysis lab, it would be difficult to determine what caused any failure, and as long as the device lasts through it's useful lifespan, not necessarily it's total lifespan, then I don't think it matters anyway.
Quote:
Holy sh*t. My system idles very hot with this weather.CPU: 38*C
GPU: 59*C
HDD: 41*C
MOBO: 54*C (dont know if this temp is correct)
In my room its about 30*C
Yes, you're a bit high. I just enabled C'n'Q and with my room @28°C CPU idles @ 29, loaded 38, motherboard 36, the only thing hotter is my HDD @42.
Related ressources:
- ForumWhy is FSB Slower than CPU internal speed?
- ForumOuch - The new AMD CPU 's are slower than the Q6600!
- ForumAXP 1800+ clock speed
- ForumBenchmarking slower than it should , HELP!
- ForumHelp! New 7800gs Agp card - waaay slower than it should be.
- ForumWhy is amd fx 8150 slower than 15
- Forum12GB of ram and computer is slower than when they were just 4GB
- ForumWill a AM3 Processor run slower in a AM2/AM2+ socket.
- ForumSplash Screen Slower than usual?
- Forumslower clock speed, faster performance?
- ForumCPU running slower than rated (not a power management issue)
- ForumIntel Core i7 2600k slower than Intel Core i7 875k
- ForumConcerning the "hygiene" of my C70 case, and how to maintain it.
- ForumIs this CPU compatible with my system?
- ForumCPU cooling
- More resources
!
)