Currently I have a TB of 3D data on some internal and external hard drives. Last week one of the drives spectacularly failed, and all the irreplaceable data contained within was permanently lost.
In an effort to avoid such a situation again I have been researching ways for an independent artist on a low budget to achieve sufficient data redundancy so that if one drive fails no data is lost and a new drive can be purchased to replace the dead one without much hassle.
After reading through the different articles on RAID arrays (which mostly seemed like gibberish to me as it’s completely out of my specialty) I concluded that the only option that I understood enough to implement myself would be to just buy five additional hard drives hand copy the files so I’d have a manual RAID 1 array of sorts.
However this solution is totally unacceptable for obvious reasons and I’m way over my head in technical jargon (even after reading TFM).
Ideally I’d want to have enough redundancy/parity data so that if one drive fails no data is, lost be able to tell when a drive is failing easily, and not have to spend more than one to two thousand or so dollars.
Browsing through the forum here after being referred by a client reveals that there are some truly knowledgeable professionals graciously offering advice, and I would deeply appreciate any insights or pointers you might have to share.
Thank you.
Sincerely Yours,
AiStouth
In an effort to avoid such a situation again I have been researching ways for an independent artist on a low budget to achieve sufficient data redundancy so that if one drive fails no data is lost and a new drive can be purchased to replace the dead one without much hassle.
After reading through the different articles on RAID arrays (which mostly seemed like gibberish to me as it’s completely out of my specialty) I concluded that the only option that I understood enough to implement myself would be to just buy five additional hard drives hand copy the files so I’d have a manual RAID 1 array of sorts.
However this solution is totally unacceptable for obvious reasons and I’m way over my head in technical jargon (even after reading TFM).
Ideally I’d want to have enough redundancy/parity data so that if one drive fails no data is, lost be able to tell when a drive is failing easily, and not have to spend more than one to two thousand or so dollars.
Browsing through the forum here after being referred by a client reveals that there are some truly knowledgeable professionals graciously offering advice, and I would deeply appreciate any insights or pointers you might have to share.
Thank you.
Sincerely Yours,
AiStouth