I am thinking of building a new gaming system. What would be the advantage or disadvantage between using the new Xenon (Woodcrest) or using the Conroe's that will be due out later?
Are you referring to Xenon, the Princess Warrior?
No, it’s not my domain. For workstation applications look at this review of older Xeons and Opterons as it shows that only certain applications can currently gain in the jump from 2 to 4+ cores.Could you give me an example of what applications require server boards and chipsets?
This may be true for AMD but I’m not aware of Nvidia releasing a Server chipset for Woodcrest or possibly even older Xeons.Server boards are usually a robust implementation of a server chipset from nVidia. Is say robust because they often are geared toward stability/24-7...
Woodcrest chipsets can support a dual FSB and quad channel memory, which is very useful for memory starved applications.
It's not really 'quad-channel', per se, because it's serial. You can't compare FB-DIMMs to DDR2 that way....The number of channels is independent of whether they are serial or parallel, so you are wrong here. They’ve gone for a serial memory buss because of the reduced trace count of serial v parallel; quad parallel would be a mess to layout on a motherboard, especially as server boards can have 8 or even 12 RAM slots.Woodcrest chipsets can support a dual FSB and quad channel memory, which is very useful for memory starved applications.