i think i'm skipping on conroe and i'll buy a quad core when it eventually comes out.
i think i'm skipping on conroe and i'll buy a quad core when it eventually comes out.
i think i'm skipping on conroe and i'll buy a quad core when it eventually comes out.
i think i'm skipping on conroe and i'll buy a quad core when it eventually comes out.
ok
If you wait for the latest and the greatest you'll never upgrade.
i think i'm skipping on conroe and i'll buy a quad core when it eventually comes out.
i think i'm skipping on conroe and i'll buy a quad core when it eventually comes out.
but DDR2 with 3000(bandwidth) are already release right? the DDR2-400 PC3200..
well, quad-core does'nt need large bandwidth memory.. even a DDR2-667 can run with quad-core
lol ur a interesting "type" lol very hm...C++'ish lol and in regards to quad cores ok we can wait for them , but look....octocores are on the horizon...lets wait for those
....to be honest i just want to get a good pc that will run the games of this year, 2007, and maby some early 2008 (which i doublt) on max visual setings , considering my monitor only alows a max resolution of 1280x1024, and ill be hapy with that, so I figured out that that midrange/to mid/high dx10 series gpu, and that 2 gigs of RAM (later upgraded to 4, max 8 Gb's ) and that core 2 duo 2.4 Ghz, should do the trick, with a nice motherboard., and so far ill stay with win xp for teh next year or 2(depending on vista, if it will be worth it "eficiency"/quality wise, especialy for gaming )
If Dx10 gets delayed until VISTA, I'll get a cheap board. Which will be
10x better than what I got now.
The conroe extreme, I really waited the faster FSB. Will re-evaluate the
situation when all the pieces come togther this fall. May get a cheaper
conroe to hold me off a little.
http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=4034In other news, TheInquirer got the official word that Direct X 10 won't find its way to Windows XP. So anyone who plans to buy Direct X 10 hardware and plans to use its full potential will have to buy Vista as well. The current driver model on the Windows XP is the limitation. One of the key points of Direct X 10 is to be the ability to have more independent objects and the current driver model on Windows XP simply won't be able to deal with it. Direct X 10 hardware will of course run Direct X 9 games and it is also supposed to do so fast.
They also report that the first DirectX 10 titles will be ready at the same time s Vista and, if we are lucky, we might be able to buy both Vista and DX 10 titles in early 2007
btw in regards to that Guru3D article, i think just geting that dx10 gpu and windows xp home oem(because its the cheepest )is teh best thing to to... to be honest i prefare to wait with my oldie system, and get a nice system rather than get a mediocore system/parts now and then upgrade to a not so great but a bit above average system later on, thats why i was waiting for the 1900xt prices to go down, to buy it, but becaues of dx10 cards coming out ill just wait, and spend that 100 more on the gpu , than geting a 900 series card now
If Dx10 gets delayed until VISTA, I'll get a cheap board.
Which will be 10x better than what I got now.