Epson announce R2400 - the true successor to the 2100/2200

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Hot off the press - R2400, UltraChrome K3 inks, plus three other new large
format Epsons announced today.

If you though the R1800 was the biz for A3+, think again...

News story at: http://dpnow.com/1789.html

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Ian Burley wrote:
> Hot off the press - R2400, UltraChrome K3 inks, plus three other new large
> format Epsons announced today.
>
> If you though the R1800 was the biz for A3+, think again...
>
> News story at: http://dpnow.com/1789.html
>
>
>

Looks just like a R1800

Tim

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Same chassis, different ink system and colour rendering engine.

Ian

"Tim S." <tts1234@cox.net> wrote in message
news:anUfe.5269$Fa1.3939@fed1read02...
> Ian Burley wrote:
>> Hot off the press - R2400, UltraChrome K3 inks, plus three other new
>> large format Epsons announced today.
>>
>> If you though the R1800 was the biz for A3+, think again...
>>
>> News story at: http://dpnow.com/1789.html
>>
>>
>>
>
> Looks just like a R1800
>
> Tim

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

I wonder why the R2400 inks longevity is so short? On Premium Luster Photo
paper is 25 years, and on Velvet Fine Art paper is 45 years. Hence I suppose
longevity on plain paper would be much lesser (may 5-10 years). This is not
generaly "normal" for pigmented inks. Does someone know why?

--
Yianni
in@mailbox9.gr (remove number nine to reply)

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

On Wed, 11 May 2005 02:26:22 +0300, "Yianni" <in@mailbox9.gr> wrote:

>I wonder why the R2400 inks longevity is so short? On Premium Luster Photo
>paper is 25 years, and on Velvet Fine Art paper is 45 years. Hence I suppose
>longevity on plain paper would be much lesser (may 5-10 years). This is not
>generaly "normal" for pigmented inks. Does someone know why?

This is because these new UltraChrome K3 inks have not been tested by
Henry Wilhelm and Epson is conservatively estimating longevity until
they are officially tested. I am confident that once tested by the
Wilhelm Institute, the numbers will increase.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Fascinating, I originally posted my message on Usenet
(comp.periphs.printers), but this forum obviously republishes Usenet
posts. This response is via this forum, rather than Usenet - I wonder
if it will appear on Usenet?

Ian

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Alas, the Usenet relationship appears to be only one-way; your posts
to the howtofixcomputers forum won't appear on Usenet, so the
likelihood is that the person who posted a question that ends up here
won't see your response.

Ian

> Ian Burley2wrote:
Fascinating, I originally posted my message on Usenet
(comp.periphs.printers), but this forum obviously republishes Usenet
posts. This response is via this forum, rather than Usenet - I wonder
if it will appear on Usenet?
>
> Ian

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Well, well -it got there in the end (from the forum back to Usenet), though
there was a delay if several days.

Ian (posting from Usenet)

"Ian Burley2" <howtofix@write.co-dot-uk.no-spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:d386$428602fd$455da0d2$24760@allthenewsgroups.com...
> Alas, the Usenet relationship appears to be only one-way; your posts
> to the howtofixcomputers forum won't appear on Usenet, so the
> likelihood is that the person who posted a question that ends up here
> won't see your response.
>
> Ian
>
>> Ian Burley2wrote:
> Fascinating, I originally posted my message on Usenet
> (comp.periphs.printers), but this forum obviously republishes Usenet
> posts. This response is via this forum, rather than Usenet - I wonder
> if it will appear on Usenet?
>>
>> Ian
>

 

[Pete]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

On Tue, 17 May 2005 10:07:47 GMT, "Ian Burley" <infoplsremove@dp-now.com>
wrote:

>Well, well -it got there in the end (from the forum back to Usenet), though
>there was a delay if several days.
>
>Ian (top posting from Usenet)

It's to punish you for top posting