Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Running BF2.

Last response: in Components
Share
July 17, 2006 10:42:49 AM

I'm just curious what kind of servers is/are used when hosting BF2 with 64 players? Im not familiar with servers at all and it would be nice to get some knowledge about it. Soon Im building my own somewhat server for private LAN gaming amongst my peers. I have never experience or around with servers and related stuff.

It would be nice to school me with this topic. :) 

More about : running bf2

July 17, 2006 12:02:05 PM

All servers need is RAM, really, and enough hard drive space to hold the games. Since they're not actually running the game, they don't need anything but a decent video card. Some people don't even run them with a monitor, but I would find it easier.

I would suggest a micro-atx case and motherboard for a server, if you have any of those lying around. Dual gigabit ethernet would be nice, but I'm not sure off the top of my head how many uATX motherboards have dual - most have single.

If you're going for cheap, I would go with an X-Qpack or Ultra's MicroFly (both come with a PSU, but I prefer Ultra to Aspire, and the MicroFly is a better case). Find an inexpesive uATX motherboard (preferably 939 or AM2, since Core 2 is expensive) and a CPU, a GB of RAM, any video card that supports the monitor you're using, and an 80 GB hard drive. Then connect it to the LAN and host the games on that through a command-line.
July 17, 2006 12:14:09 PM

Okay I don't need 64 player server but only about 10-18 players. So running a high performance pc how much players can it accomodate?

I have seen some dual-socket SLI board does that mean you can play it and use as a server at the same time?
Related resources
July 17, 2006 1:42:41 PM

You mean to say I can have 4Gb of ramage on my current gaming rig and be able to host a small lan game of BF2 with 10 players?
July 17, 2006 1:55:33 PM

Most use dual Opterons 248 with 2GB of ram.
This is only recommend for three servers running 64 players max in most cases. BF2 is very high on the server side. If you want lag free then running just 2 at max is safe. Companys found out very fast how high end of a server they needed to run BF2. Main when it first came out were very laggy because they would put up to 5 on a server with these specs. Also BF2 needs a min of 20000kb bandwidth per player. If you add voice to this it gets higher. So if plan to do this from home over the net even a t1 one is very limited to how many players you can have. But for a lan 100Mbit connect should be fine. Just as long as you are using switchs and not hubs.
July 17, 2006 2:02:36 PM

Are you kidding, you could host a 24 player server while playing with only 2gb's of ram... The game only actually takes ~900MBs when running.
July 18, 2006 1:39:01 AM

Right now my current gaming rig sports an 840, 2Gb XMS2 ram does that sound good for a 10-20 player local lan game?
July 18, 2006 8:37:32 AM

dude to host bf2 you really need big requirments and really good hardware like 2 dual core cpus try concore
July 18, 2006 11:47:53 AM

No, you don't need as good of a computer to host the game versus running the game. Most multiplayer games let you host a game using a dedicated server through a command line interface, like UT and Halo. You don't need the amazing specs of a gaming rig, because you're not running the game, but a command line!

The only thing I would suggest is to make sure you have 2 GB of RAM. But a single core and any video card with a VGA or DVI monitor conection will host any multiplayer game out there, perhaps more than one at the same time.

Since you're going over the LAN, you don't need the specs of a high-powered server (like Blizzard's) to push all the information over an Internet connection. And you're not doing anything enterprise-class, are you? It's just for a local LAN, right?
!