Hi,
I'm considering buying a new (Dell) system, mainly for the purpose of photo editing (I will not use it for games). In my configuration options I can only choose between
- 256MB nVidia™ GeForce 7300LE Turbocache
- 256MB nVidia™ GeForce 7900GS (for an extra € 200 / $ 250)
I work with photos professionally and I would value enhanced image quality if the more expensive graphics card would provide this. However, in most reviews that I've been able to find about these and other graphics cards, most predominantly games are used as benchmarks for a card's performance. So is which kind of video card (apart from I suppose its memory size?) really relevant when photo editing is concerned? Can I go with the cheaper 7300 card? Or would my image quality (I will also use extensive color calibration tools and an Eizo LCD screen) truly benefit from the more expensive 7900?
Any advice is very much appreciated.
Allon
[edit: clearified options]
I'm considering buying a new (Dell) system, mainly for the purpose of photo editing (I will not use it for games). In my configuration options I can only choose between
- 256MB nVidia™ GeForce 7300LE Turbocache
- 256MB nVidia™ GeForce 7900GS (for an extra € 200 / $ 250)
I work with photos professionally and I would value enhanced image quality if the more expensive graphics card would provide this. However, in most reviews that I've been able to find about these and other graphics cards, most predominantly games are used as benchmarks for a card's performance. So is which kind of video card (apart from I suppose its memory size?) really relevant when photo editing is concerned? Can I go with the cheaper 7300 card? Or would my image quality (I will also use extensive color calibration tools and an Eizo LCD screen) truly benefit from the more expensive 7900?
Any advice is very much appreciated.
Allon
[edit: clearified options]