Can you run this Crafty benchmark?

[Leto_Atreides]

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/alexthegreywolf3/craftyx.zip
Basically place the folder anywhere you want, doubleclick on craftyx.exe, type the word bench, and hit enter. Let it run for about a minute until it finishes, and then copy & paste here. Also, post what CPU you have, and whether it is overclocked or not.

Here's mine, on a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.2ghz 90nm:
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 1105211
Total elapsed time: 73
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.767123

 

[K8MAN]

total nodes - 80680468
raw nodes / sec - 1680843
total elapsed time - 48
smt time-to-ply measurement - 13.333333

754 A64 3700+ stock with C&Q on and 1 stick of RAM.

Oh BTW I ran it the first time with avast, windows defender, msn messenger, and about 6 torrents running and it was 1 second slower.

 

[1Tanker]

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/alexthegreywolf3/craftyx.zip
Basically place the folder anywhere you want, doubleclick on craftyx.exe, type the word bench, and hit enter. Let it run for about a minute until it finishes, and then copy & paste here. Also, post what CPU you have, and whether it is overclocked or not.

Here's mine, on a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.2ghz 90nm:
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 1105211
Total elapsed time: 73
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.767123

Setup in sig(prescott@3726)

Total nodes: 80680470
Raw nodes per second:1367465
Total elapsed time:59
SMP time-to-ply measurement:10.847458

Easy bench to install and run.

PS. I wonder why mine ran 2 nodes more?

 

[endyen]

Socket 754 3200 @ 2.4
nodes 80680468
nodes/sec 1680843
time 48 sec
SMP 13.3333

 

[K8MAN]

Socket 754 3200 @ 2.4
nodes 80680468
nodes/sec 1680843
time 48 sec
SMP 13.3333

copycat :tongue:

 

[Vinny]

Intel Pentium M w/Centrino 1.7GHz, 512MB memory

Total nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 1322630
Total elapsed time: 61
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.491803

Um... is this good or bad? I'd except its bad since it's a laptop.

 

[Leto_Atreides]

Intel Pentium M w/Centrino 1.7GHz, 512MB memory

Total nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 1322630
Total elapsed time: 61
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.491803

Um... is this good or bad? I'd except its bad since it's a laptop.

Better than my Prescott 3.2ghz.

 

[1Tanker]

you been picking your nodes? :lol: :lol:

Yeah, and i've got 2 more than you guys. I hate looking in the mirror. 8O

 

[SidVicious]

I wonder why you linked to an unofficial file that is over two years old, Here are the latest files straight from the author.

I find it suspicious that no information about "craftyx.exe" can be found, do you mind explaining where it comes from ?

For a fair comparaison, this is my score running the file that you linked to :

unable to open book file [./book.bin].
book is disabled
unable to open book file [./books.bin].
ERROR "mt=2 " is unknown rc-file option
hash table memory = 24M bytes.
pawn hash table memory = 6M bytes.

Crafty v19.17 BH

White(1): bench
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 73516959
Raw nodes per second: 1934656
Total elapsed time: 38
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 16.842105
White(1):

This is my score running the latest version on two thread (manually enter mt=2 in crafty.rc if you got a Dual Core or above) :

Initializing multiple threads.
System is SMP, not NUMA.
EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21
unable to open book file [./book.bin].
book is disabled
unable to open book file [./books.bin].
max threads set to 2
hash table memory = 24M bytes.
pawn hash table memory = 4M bytes.

Crafty v20.14 (2 cpus)

White(1): bench
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 35356900
Raw nodes per second: 3928544
Total elapsed time: 9
White(1):

Obviously, 'rig in sig...

 

[Leto_Atreides]

I wonder why you linked to an unofficial file that is over two years old, Here are the latest files straight from the author.

I find it suspicious that no information about "craftyx.exe" can be found, do you mind explaining where it comes from ?

It's the benchmark we use at CEGT to determine what time controls to use in our engine testing: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/

We don't use the newer Crafty versions because it's harder to differentiate performance with them.

 

[SidVicious]

Would you mind linking to the SMP capable version of the 19.17 release (or at least one which would make use of the mt=2 flag) ? I tried to look for it but all I got is a bunch of dead links...

 

[Leto_Atreides]

Would you mind linking to the SMP capable version of the 19.17 release (or at least one which would make use of the mt=2 flag) ? I tried to look for it but all I got is a bunch of dead links...

Try this: ftp://cito.kicks-ass.net/pub/Older-Crafty/crafty19.17.zip

Although for this thread I'd prefer if the single-threaded version is used.

 

[SidVicious]

My guess would be that the newer versions won't waste time trying to compute asine moves.

 

[SidVicious]

Crafty-smp.exe with the mt=2 flag :

Initializing multiple threads.
System is SMP, not NUMA.
unable to open book file [./book.bin].
book is disabled
unable to open book file [./books.bin].
max threads set to 2
hash table memory = 24M bytes.
pawn hash table memory = 6M bytes.

Crafty v19.17 BH (2 cpus)

White(1): bench
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 80036588
Raw nodes per second: 4212452
Total elapsed time: 19
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 33.684211
White(1):

Crafty-smp.exe without the mt=2 flag :

Initializing multiple threads.
System is SMP, not NUMA.
unable to open book file [./book.bin].
book is disabled
unable to open book file [./books.bin].
hash table memory = 24M bytes.
pawn hash table memory = 6M bytes.

Crafty v19.17 BH (1 cpus)

White(1): bench
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 73516959
Raw nodes per second: 2042137
Total elapsed time: 36
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 17.777778
White(1):

 

[illinikevin]

Total nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 1391042
Total elapsed time: 58
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 11.034483

 

[lcdguy]

Total Nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 1613609
Total elapsed time: 50
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 12.800000

System Run On:

Opteron 165 @ 2.4GHZ
1GB OCZ GX XTC PC3500 DDR

 

[Mex]

Total nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 754023
Total elapsed time: 107
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 5.981308

Socket 370 Celeron 1.10A GHz @ 1.46 GHz
No wonder mine took twice as long to run as everybody elses...

 

[Leto_Atreides]

Anyone with an X2 4200+ or Pentium D 830 or 930? So far 38 is the best score, achieved by SidVicious's OC'd X2 3800+.

 

[chewbenator]

Total Nodes: 80680468
RNPS: 1522272
TeT: 53
P2P: 12.075472

AMD 3400+ @ stock 2.2 Ghz

Firefox running.

 

[m25]

P4 3.0GHZ HT

Total nodes: 80680468
Raw nodes per second: 1075739
Total elapsed time: 75
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.53333