Especially with all the discussion about the AMD/ATI deal, I've been reading a lot of comments lately to the tune of "I will never let any ATI component in my computer. Death to AMD and long live Intel."
Myself, I'm baffled by all this anti-ATI thinking. A year ago I built a PC and selected an X800 XL for the graphics (I found it to be the best price/performance in my price range). I booted up, installed windows, downloaded new ATI drivers, installed, rebooted, and was gaming away with no problems in mere minutes.
Meanwhile, a friend of mine has a 6600 GT in his PC build. He also had to do nothing more than install new drivers to get his card working perfectly.
As far as I can tell, nVidia and ATI cards are just as easy to install and use. Sure, their features may sometimes differ (my X800 has no SM3.0 support, for example), but that's all explicitly stated on the box.
Is there some reason I always see such rabid anti-ATI comments? Near as I can tell, ATI and nVidia are neck-and-neck in just about every area.
Myself, I'm baffled by all this anti-ATI thinking. A year ago I built a PC and selected an X800 XL for the graphics (I found it to be the best price/performance in my price range). I booted up, installed windows, downloaded new ATI drivers, installed, rebooted, and was gaming away with no problems in mere minutes.
Meanwhile, a friend of mine has a 6600 GT in his PC build. He also had to do nothing more than install new drivers to get his card working perfectly.
As far as I can tell, nVidia and ATI cards are just as easy to install and use. Sure, their features may sometimes differ (my X800 has no SM3.0 support, for example), but that's all explicitly stated on the box.
Is there some reason I always see such rabid anti-ATI comments? Near as I can tell, ATI and nVidia are neck-and-neck in just about every area.