Well, let's see - a fraction of the brightness, a fraction of the contrast, only looks perfect in one resolution, no better than 30fps without tearing...
Yes - 30fps. 1000/60=16.77ms response. Your LCD must be this fast throughout all of its range AND have less than one frame latency for color stabilization/overdrive correction. But wait - you say thwat's 60fps. Well...
Unfortunately, only a couple do. And none in the 19 inch range. If its slower that that in any way, our eyes tend to see it as an interlaced monitor(or like a CRT with flourescents nearby). If it doesn't look perfect, it looks barely better than a TV set. And many don't even do better than *30* fps if you look at the reviews here.
A good CRT - crystal clear, 100fps+, and looks perfect every time. The better ones use the Hitachi Diamondtron technology. This uses a diamond shaped grid, so you get .20 dot pitch along one axis and .23-24 along the other. KDS uses this in some of their monitors, and they are inexpensive as well. Sony are also good, but overpriced. Viewsonic is like a Sony close for certain models, and a good second choice over the KDS.
Despite the marketing, LCDs are still a decade away from replacing CRTs in terms of technical specs and quality.