Hello Everybody,
"he is strongly biased towards Canon printers"
Do you really think that ? I hope not. Why should I prefer a printer with a higher cost per page if the quality is the same or even less good ?
My opinion is that the S520, the S750, the S820, the S900 et the S9000 are excellents printers. I like less the S200 and S300 and I hate the S100, that is the worst printer of the market.
My trouble is that you say I'm "biased towards Canon printers" just because you prefer the Epson's models. Isn't it a little short ? personnaly, I don't have any problem with them.
"have any of you Epson owners ever needed to replace the print head?"
Do you mean there's no risk to change these heads ? If so, you're wrong. Tell about it to people that don't use their printers as often as you. I was a big Epson's fan. I loved my Stylus 740. But now, you can find much better. And actually, I'm not writing that you're going to change these heads, but that this is a danger with this technologie. That is the same for Canon.
"I had to clean the print head maybee 4-5 times "
You had to do it yourself only 4-5 times but the printer does it automatically quite often, without asking anything. But don't worry, it quite the same for every printers.
"Why did he compare it the Epson 1280. Why not the 785 or the 820?"
Because the 1280's price is close to the one of the S900. If I want to compare the Stlys 785 and 820 with some Canon printers, it will be with the new S820. And you already know that the comments about the 1280's cost per page and quality are the same for the 785.
"It isn't even mentioned that the quality can only be measured by looking at prints of the same image side by side."
How do you think I do ? Exactly like that.
Vincent Alzieu
vincent@tomshardware.fr