Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Network question

Network question

Forum Old Man/Woman's Club : Other - Network question

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Working ona side job, and something make me pause and think for a moment. The job is for a dentist office. Can the X-ray machines interfere with LAN, Phone, or CATV at all?

Thanks, and poop on you all!!!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

In an industrial/commercial location all wires in our area have to be put into conduit. For protection. But htere is the factthat many machines run in similar and sometimes crosstalk other frequencies.....No Cell Phones Alllowed. Interesting :?

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/2460/untitled1cy2.jpg

Reply to ACGinc

Quote :

Working ona side job, and something make me pause and think for a moment. The job is for a dentist office. Can the X-ray machines interfere with LAN, Phone, or CATV at all?

Thanks, and poop on you all!!!



Up your Focking Arse, Noob!

Oh wait. Sorry Jef.

:wink: :lol:

Ask Riser, he's the network professional around here who actually has a job as a network analyst which means he spends his arse on here all day typing to dead-shites like you and I. :wink: :wink: :wink:

Hey, look at that, I did a triple winky. Special! :roll:

Even threw in a Mac special for you on the end there; you dig>? :wink: :P :lol: :P :wink: :roll: :P :lol: :P :P :P :P 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

Reply to BomberBill

all those smilly faces are going to induce a flashback...
!!! ACID !!!

Sh[i][/i]it man I'm back in the early 90's 8O

Reply to audiovoodoo

...*plays Shamen album*...

Reply to WingDing
- 0 +

I'm back in the late 60s...

Reply to _WW_

** Cranks up the 808 State and heads off to find he Future Sound of London 12'' mixes **

Reply to audiovoodoo

Yes but which century?

Reply to audiovoodoo

The 1700's. He's making muskets like a motherf*cker to prepare for the big one.

Reply to KingLoftusXII

Quote :

Working ona side job, and something make me pause and think for a moment. The job is for a dentist office. Can the X-ray machines interfere with LAN, Phone, or CATV at all?

For wired not any more than a flourescent light fixture - some more than others. Check the machine if possible for an FCC id tag, but the standard of staying 6in or so away is just good installation practice, and a simple CYA. For wireless I've heard it can mess up the 2.4ghz frequencies pretty good. I would guess it depends on the machine and how well it's shielded.

Mike.

Reply to fishmahn
- 0 +

Which is the higher concern the affect one the medical equipment from the networking equipment or the networking equipment being affected my th medical? Chicken or egg?

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/2460/untitled1cy2.jpg

Reply to ACGinc

I stayed as far above the drop ceiling as I could, and split the difference between the fluorescent fixtures.

Still not sure about the X-ray machines, but I don't think I'm within 6 feet of one.

Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

not sure but i think it is different between shielded and unshielded...

Reply to mrface
- 0 +

Wireless will drop.

Running cables, not a problem. If you're running in a ceiling or something, code states you need to use plenum cabling. Don't run over the lighting.. which should be shielded by metal. Don't run the cables by electrical or anything that might spike. Otherwise, you'll be fine.

Almost all hospitals in major cities have their X-Ray machines hooked up to cabling for instant results - but they still use film for just-in-case/CYA should the computers fail.

Shouldn't be an issue for you.

Reply to Riser
- 0 +

STP cabling is the way to go here. Stay away from wireless.

Reply to mugz

We aren't using wireless because he's in a public office building, so there's too great of a chance of people picking up the signal, and he's planning on buying a laptop. For one laptop, I told him to wire it.

I used UTP, and I stayed away from the lighting, and whenever possible, the conduit in general. I used riser cable because it was what I had, and I thought plenum was for going floor to floor, so I missed that one. Not sure that low voltage is subject to inspection, but if I have to, I'll re-run the cables. :oops:

Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

I don't know about LV being subject to inspection there, but around here it isn't. Been 2 years since I last installed a network though. Safest to (mentally at least) prepare for that swine Finagle and his mad prophet Murphy...

Reply to mugz
- 0 +

STP is mainly used in European nations - UTP is in North America.

Reply to Riser
- 0 +

I've seen both used very frequently around here (South Africa). STP is used mainly where the engineer/admin in charge of the network is worried about interference (or in one memorable case, where the admin was incredibly - and hilariously - paranoid), while UTP is mostly used where the engineer/admin wants the job done NOW so we can go party for the weekend.

Bearing in mind that in this country we have at least two sets of international standards that we try to conform to, often 3 or more.

Reply to mugz

Right. I understand the use for STP, but I would rarely use it over here...

We did have a situation where some lights here screwed up some data flow. We have a room full of scanners that are all wireless. The cable for one of the access points ran directly over the lights in the room. With the lights on, downloading the data to the scanners was like 7 hours. With the lights off, it was WAY less, like maybe 90 minutes or so... We moved the cable, and all was well.

Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

I think you have to special order STP in Ameica.. I haven't been able to find it out in any stores or anything. I suppose it has something to do with your power grids being more advanced than in the US.

Running over lights is never good.. there is a reason they're shrouded in metal, even though its already grounded. It blocks of a lot of interference. I had that problem in college.. they ran 5000' of cabling over the lights. I had to crawl through the ceiling and rerun at least 2000' because they ran over the lights and were too short to reach after the rerouting.

I like telling people the longer the cable, the longer it takes for the data to get there. People are dumb. :)

Reply to Riser

Quote :

People are dumb. :)



...says the man dancing in a chicken suit.

Reply to llama_man
- 0 +

I'm not really network savvy, but after reading this thread I can tell that the retard that installed ours wasn't either.

Reply to Anoobis
- 0 +

Most of the guys who install network cable are the guys who run telephone lines.. they never have a clue about it, just run it like phone lines.

Cat 3 for use in networking was created by my ex-girlfriend's dad. They were working in their building using coax cables and it was too hard to run. They made up their own punch down plugs and ran there system over the phone lines.

He has a picture of him holding a punch down he made along with.. what's the company that bought it off him? I can't think of its and it a huge name. I'm feeling dumb right now on that.. anyhow, he has a picture of him holding it and a couple guys from... RCA or something, congratulating him on his invention. 6-8 months after that he said they were mass producing the cables. He received no credit and only a couple thousand dollars for it.. he didn't realize how big it was going to go.

He has had over 100 patents on inventions dating back to the late 70s.

Reply to Riser
- 0 +

Indeed that's correct. The guy who "installed", and I use that term loosely, the cabling really just installs phone systems and doesn't know jack. Unfortunately he was in cahoots with the guy who spec'd the computer system as well. They did a first class job too because a single proc PIII 512MB Dell server does great job at running a SQL database, web server (not anymore), & mail server at the same time. And those 10 Dell 128MB, P4 S478 Willys they spec'd run XP great once they cache for an hour before login. And let's not forget the great website the "computer guy's son" put together. Truly a work of art in modern online security because our customers all had to login under the same password. It was so simple and such a great idea. I cannot understand why nobody else thought of it.

Reply to Anoobis
- 0 +

Yeah, there is a reason we're not rich. We don't think like thieving bastards.. ask Tom, he'll tell ya.

Reply to Riser
- 0 +

STP around here is only slightly less readily available than UTP, but at least twice the price - I'm not really sure how our power grids stack up in comparison to the US, but lately I'm not really impressed.

After last year, though, the Western Cape (where I live) was the only province that was prepared for power issues when they spread to the rest of the country in January - UPSes, generators, you name it, we have it (and the rest of the country had UPS/generator/etc shortages :twisted: ).

Telling people that little 'myth' about the length of cable and time data takes to travel is often the easiest way to get the damn job done to decent standards in spite of client interference. The kicker is that it's actually true (immeasurably so, but yeah).

Little story I regularly use on clients - a ship pulls into the dock with severe engine trouble, and the ship engineers haven't a clue what's going on. So they call in an engineer from the town, who duly goes through to the engine room. Once he's in there, all he does is listen to this, feel that, inspect something else... and after about four or five hours extracts a tiny little hammer from inside his case and whacks something with it. Engine trouble mysteriously just goes away. So he hands the captain a bill for R10,000. The captain submits the bill to the company, who send it back asking for an itemised invoice.

The itemised invoice read as follows:
Hitting widget with hammer: R5.00
Knowing which widget to hit: R9995.00

Reply to mugz

Quote :

Most of the guys who install network cable are the guys who run telephone lines.. they never have a clue about it, just run it like phone lines.

Actually, I learned on network cables, so I usually go overkill for the phones and run them to LAN specs, such as using CAT5e and running them all back to a central location rather than splicing them mid-run...

Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

About the only difference there on the 3 occasions I put in phone nets (at the same time as ethernetworks, go figure) I used specific cabling - cat2 (or is it 3?) for phones, cat5e for ethernet. Otherwise, the two networks were indistinguishable - and the bloody monkeys (sorry AV) maintaining the things still get the two mixed up every time they have to make a modification to the cabling. *sigh*

Reply to mugz

THat's why I like to have full control or no control. I don't mind running cables and leaving, but if I do some work, then someone else comes in and messes with all of it, then they call me back, it's going to cost them...

Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

Cat3 is becoming hard to find because it costs just as much as Cat5e these days.

If you ever run phone lines, might as well run Cat5e to make them digital ready and should you need a line, you already have it run instead of a Cat3 slow cable.

Reply to Riser
- 0 +

That's a valid point.

Cat3 is still fairly cheap around here, and plentiful, although even our technologically-challenged service providers are starting to catch on... hmmm...

Then again, that's something I haven't done for about 2+ years now anyways.

Reply to mugz
- 0 +

I don't bother anymore because its time consuming and the money isn't there. Everyone thinks they can run the cable and punch down themselves. Go for it.. people screw up like no other.

In fact, we had Blackbox come in and rewire one of our plants. Probably 48 nodes. After they tested them with their cabling equipment and gave the OK and left, we found out less than 50% of them functioned.

Called them back in and they blamed dust for making the connections not work. :roll:

Reply to Riser

I'm making pretty good money on this job.

The problem is that it's so labor intensive!

I don't have any problem doing it. Throw on my Zen and run / punch some cable...

Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

I got screwed on a couple jobs. I was only charging $50/hr @ 30 hrs or less of work.

I had to setup a 2k small business server, email, rebuild 20 desktops, add them to the network, run all the cable, install all the software, make sure that worked, document and have someone trained on it.

It was for someone I used to go to college with and I was helping out.. so $1500 for all wasn't a big deal. He was getting quotes of $10k to do it.

When it came down to it, I went in without a contract and the guy only gave me $700.

The best part was the next day the guy screwed the server up and made a backup over the tape that I had a working back up on. He lost it all and had to pay $5k to get someone in to fix it. :P

Reply to Riser

Well, I'm billing $75 per run (each run is billed separate, even if they go to the same location, like phone / LAN), then billing for the extras (router, patch panel, patch cables, etc).

[rant]These focking cockasses with their stupid cable prices. Black Box is like $3 and $8 for 1' and 10' cables. Newegg is $1 and $2, but their shipping is exorbatant for the cables. It doesn't scale down. $35 in shipping if I remember correctly... Assanine...[/rant]

So it's a good amount of work, but it's going to be worth my while.

Reply to JustPlainJef
- 0 +

Yeah, you'll do good. That's fair price for cabling.

I can order cabling from CDW fairly cheap with cheap shipping. I went into a CompUSA and spent $200 on what CDW would cost me $30.

Reply to Riser

I get bulk boxes (1000' or 1100') for about $70.

I use the Leviton snap-in connectors because they are available at Home Depot, for if I run out or if I have to go replace one later, but I haven't been able to find them for under $3 for the Cat5e ones...

Phones and coax are a bit cheaper, and I'm starting to use the standard plates for single phone or coax, as those are cheaper yet...

I get to do S-video and component video (RCA jack) on this job, so that should be good to learn. I'd like to do a whole-house audio system sometime soon...

Reply to JustPlainJef
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Network question
Go to:

There are 657 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them