ASUS A8N5X Socket 939 NVIDIA nForce4 ATX AMD Motherboard
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice 2000MHz HT Socket 939 Processor
eVGA 256-P2-N516 Geforce 7800GT CO SE 256MB GDDR3 PCI Express x16
2GB PC3200 DDR Dual Channel
2x 100GB WD SATA HD
Blah blah blah stock cooling.
The processor I have right now comes stock at 1.8GHZ and I overclocked it to 2.4GHZ on stock air cooling with no temperature gain at all, and no difference between stock and overclocked on full load either.
Now I put together this rig about 4 months ago like a week before 7900's came out( got my 7800 for 259.99 and now they dont even sell them except from the eVGA site for 450$+)
I plan on upgrading my processor now that AMD dropped their prices and i'm looking into the http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103546 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Toledo, and the Toledo being becuase it has 2x 1MB L2 cache for a total of 2Mb's of L2 cache as opposed to 2x 512kb for a total of 1Mb L2. The price on the 4400 is now only $259 bucks, where the Conroe E6600 will be debuting at around $320ish MSRP (expect it to be a little higher than MSRP, probably $350)
Now heres the question.
Should I upgrade to the 4400+, which would only cost me the price of the processor + shipping, or go for the E6600, and have to get a whole new motherboard and have to buy 2gb of DDR2 ram (minimum $180 bucks probably for a half decent motherboard with good chipset, and $180 for the ram).
Anyone have some comparisons between these two processors? I know the E6600 is highly overclockable up to 4ghz but has locked multipliers and sports 4MB l2 cache, but would it honestly be worth $700+ bucks?
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice 2000MHz HT Socket 939 Processor
eVGA 256-P2-N516 Geforce 7800GT CO SE 256MB GDDR3 PCI Express x16
2GB PC3200 DDR Dual Channel
2x 100GB WD SATA HD
Blah blah blah stock cooling.
The processor I have right now comes stock at 1.8GHZ and I overclocked it to 2.4GHZ on stock air cooling with no temperature gain at all, and no difference between stock and overclocked on full load either.
Now I put together this rig about 4 months ago like a week before 7900's came out( got my 7800 for 259.99 and now they dont even sell them except from the eVGA site for 450$+)
I plan on upgrading my processor now that AMD dropped their prices and i'm looking into the http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103546 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Toledo, and the Toledo being becuase it has 2x 1MB L2 cache for a total of 2Mb's of L2 cache as opposed to 2x 512kb for a total of 1Mb L2. The price on the 4400 is now only $259 bucks, where the Conroe E6600 will be debuting at around $320ish MSRP (expect it to be a little higher than MSRP, probably $350)
Now heres the question.
Should I upgrade to the 4400+, which would only cost me the price of the processor + shipping, or go for the E6600, and have to get a whole new motherboard and have to buy 2gb of DDR2 ram (minimum $180 bucks probably for a half decent motherboard with good chipset, and $180 for the ram).
Anyone have some comparisons between these two processors? I know the E6600 is highly overclockable up to 4ghz but has locked multipliers and sports 4MB l2 cache, but would it honestly be worth $700+ bucks?