I have a 3500+ Venice core and due to the recent price drops I am looking to upgrade to a 939 x2,
I cannot decide if I am better off going for an x2 3800+ or paying either £35 more for an x2 4200+ or another £70 for a 4600+ when in real terms the only difference is 200Mhz and 400Mhz (or 10% more and 20% more)
I am not really interested in overclocking it, I am not a praticularly big game player either.
Bit like the question should I upgrade my old SB Live! for something newer when I probably will not really notice any difference.
I cannot decide if I am better off going for an x2 3800+ or paying either £35 more for an x2 4200+ or another £70 for a 4600+ when in real terms the only difference is 200Mhz and 400Mhz (or 10% more and 20% more)
I am not really interested in overclocking it, I am not a praticularly big game player either.
Bit like the question should I upgrade my old SB Live! for something newer when I probably will not really notice any difference.