Figures from market research companies agree that AMD has started to bite into Intel's desktop market share, but to what extent depends on which set of analysts you choose to believe. Read more
Sources claimed chip company AMD has several X86-based Geode products on the boil, codenamed Castle, Snowmass and Dragonfly. Read more
With availability of the GeForce Go 7700 graphics processing unit (GPU), Nvidia has beat ATI Technologies to the punch in the 80 nm manufacturing process. Read more
More here at Read more
Recent price drops have made 4 GB DDR2 dual-channel kits affordable for even the most cost-conscious buyers. We pushed nine models to their limits to determine best value for a broad range of users. Read more
We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more
On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more
This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more
|
Page :
1
2
Previous
|
|
| Author |
Thread : Cyrix beats AMD and intel
|
|
Profile: addict
More Information
|
They were actually the first one to market with a cpu that integrated the gpu and memory controller into the cpu.
|
|
Related Product
|
|
Profile: addict
More Information
|
they beat them back in 1997? and this year is 2006 am i wrong?
|
|
1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
cirix were the worst CPU's made. i remeber using them back in collage and out of all the spare CPU's there the Pentium 1 at 75mHz was faster thean a cyrix 166mhz |
|
Profile: addict
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
|
I still remember them. I had the PR100 and PR200+ way back.
|
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
I used a couple of those back in the day. I had a Pentium Pro 150MHz and my friend had a Cyrix 200MHz... needless to say my system flat out wasted his for performance. I'm suprised they tried that whole integration thing though. Good for them. Doesn't look like it helped business wise. |
|
Profile: newbie
More Information
|
Cyrix had some good company picnics, let me tell you!
|
|
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information
|
Cyrix is most well known (were that is) for their math co-processors for the 386 series machines (I had a 386SX-25mhz machine with a Cyrix Math CO it was the bomb |
|
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information
|
You can Wiki for Cyrix and 486 and get a rather boring and not entirely accuate history lesson.
|
|
Profile: addict
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: journeyman
More Information
|
Also, I think they were the first to introduce the PR (performance rating) thing. Followed by AMD then Intel... |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: newbie
More Information
|
I had an overclocked Cyrix MII running at 250Mhz which was labelled 333+. It was built to compete with intel's PII 333 Mhz. Cyrix was outperformed by Pentium MMX 166 Mhz |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
I remember buying a Cyrix chip and mobo for my new QW habit, and the game was really jittery. I couldn't understand it as it was really fast in Windows 95.
|
|
Profile: addict
More Information
|
|
