recommendations for headphones

hi everyone!

im looking into buying headphones for
1)late nights playiing computer games and listening to music (mostly music)..cant wake the family up with my stereo and speakers

2)long car rides plane trips etc.

i dont mind if they are big or ugly

im looking to spend under 100$ (mab more but thats the target price cuz i know someone will say senn 595s and i cant shell out 200 for phones)

im more into bass quality then bass quantity

do i need an amplifier? or is my stereo headphone jack amplified (mid range pioneer 815 reciever)

how do u amplify heaphones while listenning to an ipod? do i need too?

an yes i do know mp3 bitrate is important...all my stuff is minimum 192 cbr and mostly 320 or high bitrate vbr- just cant fit it all on an ipod in wav or flac :( where are those 200 gb ipods?
79 answers Last reply
More about recommendations headphones
  1. Hey Chase,
    I know your looking to spend under $ 100,00 are you talking USD ??
    Sennheiser has a few models that can fit into that budget...However if you can squeeze a few more $" ....I was at Future Shop (in Canada), I know you can get these in US too, and I was looking at the iPods and they had a set of Bose headphones that were quite small....just covered the ears....were lightweight....small head harness.
    BUT DAMN MAN CAN THAT THING PUMP BASS !!! 8O
    The sound that set can put out is PURE EAR CANDY ...The price for this headset was $ 190.00 Canadian $ ... so USD would be about $ 150.00.
    So you see, if you can shell out a bit more, ya got yoself some kick @ss headphones that can accomodate gaming AND the ability to listen to music to carry with you an your i Pod. :wink:

    That's just my view on it man...with me it's all about the bass and sound :D

    RIG specs
    Antec P180 PerformanceSeries Mid-Tower Case
    SeaSonic S12 600 watt power supply
    Asus A8N32 SLI mobo AMD N-Force 4 SLIX16 (bios 1103 V02.58)
    RealTek 97 onboard digital 5.1 Surround
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Toledo Core, 2 X 1mb L2 cache (AMD driver 1.3.1.0 w/MS hotfix)
    2 gigs of Corsair TwinX3500LL Pro @ 437Mhz 2-3-2-6-1T
    2- BFG Tech 7900 GT OC 256mb in SLI (nvidia driver 91.31)
    Western Digital RAPTOR 74.3 gig 10-K rpm HDD for XP & Apps
    Maxtor SATA II 250 G HDD for gaming, movies, MP3's
    Maxtor SATA II 250 G HDD for document backup (unplugged)
    Sony CD rom 52X
    Plextor 708-A DVD/CD rom
    Logitech Z-5500 digital 5.1 THX Surround 500watts
  2. I love my Grado SR60s, but as for whether they're still made, nevermind current pricing, I have no idea. I would have thought they'd be around the $100 mark, but no certainty. Failing that, anything by Sennheiser is usually decent.
    Synergy6
  3. Sennheiser Sennheiser Sennheiser Sennheiser Sennheiser

    best money you will EVER spend.

    its like having your ears being taken on holiday.

    cant stress how good they are.

    get a pair. the customer service is second to none.

    bought a pair for Doom3. ages ago i now but they just are so good i have yet to hear anything like them. even B&O stuggle to make stuff this good.

    SennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiserSennheiser
  4. I have to recommend Sennheiser as well. I have some on my head right now in fact.

    I have the PX100's - they're super-aural (they don't enclose your ears) so I can hear people sneaking up on me.

    They cost me about $45 a year or so ago. Best pair of headphones I've ever ever owned. If you thought Sony/Panasonics were good, these will blow you away.

    The quality of the sound reproduction is very very good IMO.
    If you're used to higher end phones, then you might find something wrong w/ them, but I am completely happy with these. Best $45 I've ever spent on headphones. Plus it comes w/ a nifty carrying case.

    I'm using them right now w/ my iPod mini.

    You shouldn't need to amplify headphones when you plug them into a headphone jack. If you plug them into a line-out jack, I think the voltage is higher for those so you might want to be careful not to kill your headphones.

    If you're on an airplane alot, you might want noise-cancelling ones.
  5. I have a sennheiser hd 212 pro...and i use them with a cd player, they sound really nice and the bass is awesome,feel like inside car with a 12" subwoffer, sound quality is awesome as well, i really like this cans ... :D
    As far as i know as long the impedance is 32 ohm,you can still use it with player like ipod etc, if the impedance is greater than that let say 64 ohm,you can still use it with your ipod but you need to turn your volume a bit louder to make all the sound comes out.
    you also need to consider do you want open or closed headphone...
    Using a open headphone with a loud volume means the sound will go out, so the person near you can hear your music :D
  6. I would recommend either the Sennheiser HD-280s or the Sony MDR-7506s. Both are right at your $100 price point.

    I currently use the 7506s because I prefer sound that's as accurate as can be.

    All of the people telling you to straight out go Sennheiser are just biased. You should listen for yourself, as is the case with all audio products, if at all possible. Don't go for the Bose, their equipment is priced around 3 times what a comparable alternative would cost. Bose = Buy other sound equipment.

    From my experience, I am extremely satisfied with the 7506s. They provide tight, crisp sound at just about any volume level, and don't miss out on any of the nuances in my music that I listen to. I also own a pair of the Bose triports that one of the previous posters mentioned. They do put out an impressive amount of bass, but it's muddy bass. The moment I tried the Sony headphones, I was immediately impressed by how tight the bass was on it. With the right source, I felt like I could pick out each and every movement of the membrane on the drums in my music :D I felt the same way about the upper and midrange too. During the DJ gig that I tested out my 7506s on, we had two studio level condenser mics inside a grand piano, and the sound the sonys put out made me feel like I was inside the piano itself. They could actually differentiate the slight variations in timing from the high end sound hitting the mic positioned on the low end of the piano, and vice versa. If that isn't impressive clarity...I don't know what is.

    Since you seem to be interested in travelling with the headphones a bit, I would also say that the 7506s feel very durable, and also fold up for easy packing.

    Maybe I sound like I'm endorsing the Sonys, but that's just been my experience with the headphones. You might not get the same results, as I was on professional DJ equipment. Since using the headphones at home on my Panny XR55, my music hasn't been sounding quite impressive lately, and I'm thinking that now I've finally heard the difference between real life and a recording :?

    Overall, I think I would still recommend that you try and get your hands on each of the headphones and see which ones sound best to you. You say you're more interested in accurate bass than lots of bass, but who's to say that the Sennheisers wouldn't be good enough for your tastes in the accuracy department, but still put out a higher amount of it?
  7. wow, i would never spend more than $15 on a pair of headphones
  8. Quote:
    wow, i would never spend more than $15 on a pair of headphones


    your missing out...

    thats like wiping your arse with sand paper. it will get the job done but you wont enjoy it.
  9. Quote:
    wow, i would never spend more than $15 on a pair of headphones


    your missing out...

    thats like wiping your arse with sand paper. it will get the job done but you wont enjoy it.

    Nice.
  10. yes im in US$ sorry i keep forgetting that there is alot of CAN peeps on these forums.

    you guys keep talking 'bout that boomin bass- exactly what i said i wasnt looking for lol!

    i prefer clear music over loud stuff (loud annd clear if possible!) so if headphones are 32 ohm then that means they will go fine with an ipod?

    i know that bigger cans will sound better and these are not for my portable set (i already have some 30$ ones for school and jogging)

    i also dont really care what it makes me look like so style IS NOT a factor. i would prefer closed as i dont want to be rude on an airplane or around others with my music blastin.

    i checked newegg and saw the senns and sonys for like 100 bux.. i shouldnt need an amp for those?
  11. The sony's are definitely loud and clear. I think they are 63ohm resistance, so if the sennheisers are 32ohm then the sonys will be a bit harder to drive, and you'll have to push the volume up a bit higher to get the full range of sound that you're looking for. But since you're looking for both loud and clear, this shouldn't be a problem, right? :)
  12. Hey Chase.....I know what you said LOL...you said.....and I quote "bass QUALITY, not bass QUANTITY"....and the Bose head set DOES just that. I guess I didn't explain my perception properly.

    What I really meant to say was that the Bose headset gives you a FULL rounded out sound field. ANd if you DID want a more "bassy" feel to a particular track....these ones will give it to you through the sound field selections that are available in your ipod.

    But as posted by the majority of peeps in here, myself included, Sennheiser makes some awsome headsets. I tested a few out at Future Shop near my place and I gotta say, Bose AND SEnnheiser were almost comparable. Not so much in quality because they are equal as far as I'm concerned, but in how they project the sound.

    I say try them both out, and you be the judge, since everyones ears will perceive sounds and music differently right?

    Take care dude and let me know what you get K?
    Mike

    RIG specs
    Antec P180 PerformanceSeries Mid-Tower Case
    SeaSonic S12 600 watt power supply
    Asus A8N32 SLI mobo AMD N-Force 4 SLIX16 (bios 1103 V02.58)
    RealTek 97 onboard digital 5.1 Surround
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Toledo Core, 2 X 1mb L2 cache (AMD driver 1.3.1.0 w/MS hotfix)
    2 gigs of Corsair TwinX3500LL Pro @ 437Mhz 2-3-2-6-1T
    2- BFG Tech 7900 GT OC 256mb in SLI (nvidia driver 91.31)
    Western Digital RAPTOR 74.3 gig 10-K rpm HDD for XP & Apps
    Maxtor SATA II 250 G HDD for gaming, movies, MP3's
    Maxtor SATA II 250 G HDD for document backup (unplugged)
    Sony CD rom 52X
    Plextor 708-A DVD/CD rom
    Logitech Z-5500 digital 5.1 THX Surround 500watts
  13. A good place to get some objective information on headphones (and for actually buying them) is www.headphone.com (aka, HeadRoom). The AKG K26P's are highly rated and popular @ a $45 price point, I think I may get a pair myself. I'd also check out the Sennheiser HD202's @ $25. There's a bunch that are well within your budget.

    At the pricepoint you're talking about you likely won't need or really benefit from a headphone amp. The sets in this range are pretty low impedance and are meant to be driven by portable players. If you start looking at sets rated at about more than ~60 ohms you'll start to hear a difference with a headphone amp, in terms of dynamics. E.g, a soundcard isn't going to drive a pair of Sennheiser HD500/600/650's very well, but will drive a pair of HD202's or HD595's just fine, with an amp only improving upon dynamics, depth, and overall richness of sound. If you can find a set of Sony MDR-V6 (~$80) you'll likely enjoy the sound too, if you like tight bass for rock, hip-hop, yet their ear cushions tend to disintigrate after a couple years of use. Stay away from the Sony MDR-V600's...they're like the rice-cakes of headphones, IMO.

    Check out http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-budget/40-80/ if you have an opportunity.
  14. Hey Halcyon,
    Thanks for that link, I'm gonna check that out for sure :wink:
  15. You should narrow down exactly what type of headphone suits your needs. You said that you take long car and plane trips, so do you need something that isolates, or something circumaural, supra-aural, maybe even in-ear monitors? Take a look at www.headfi.org...
  16. Buying sound reproduction equipment is always a subjective experience, so it should go without saying that opinions should always be taken with a quantity of salt (regardless of whether you're spending $10 or $10000.)

    I used to use an old $20 pair of Radio Shack Pro20's (rebranded Koss equipment) and they compared favorably against a friend's expensive Sennheisers (400-series?)--my pair only seemed to be lacking at the frequency extremes...
    I've since replaced them with a pair of Sennheiser HD201's from Amazon. I find myself agreeing with the positive reviews of the model; for a product aimed at the (sub-)$20 market, it performs extremely well. I find the drivers to be responsive and well-balanced, and even though it is a closed design, the lower frequencies don't seen to be unduly reinforced. I think the best selling point is that it doesn't feel like a vice on your head after extended use. The very lengthy cord might be the only potential deficiency.
  17. I've read above and saw that someone recommended the BOSE (TriPorts or QC2's?). I auditioned the TriPorts for about a week. They sound great until you consider their price-point. They're way overpriced for their build and sound quality, IMO. One can do significantly better in both aspects for significantly less money: http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-budget/80-150/

    The GRADO SR80's are in there along with a plate-full of Sennheiser's @ the $100 price-point. That gives you plenty of options. The nice thing about HeadRoom is they're objectivity in the area of reviews and they'll let you know in the review whether or not you really need an amp for a particular set of cans. I've purchased both my sets of cans from them as well as my Di-Marzio M-Paths. They're shipping and customer service seems more than adequate IMO. They're staff seems knowledgable, as well. My next set of cans from them will be the AKG K701's. ...contender for world's best.
  18. Quote:
    A good place to get some objective information on headphones (and for actually buying them) is www.headphone.com (aka, HeadRoom). The AKG K26P's are highly rated and popular @ a $45 price point, I think I may get a pair myself. I'd also check out the Sennheiser HD202's @ $25. There's a bunch that are well within your budget.

    At the pricepoint you're talking about you likely won't need or really benefit from a headphone amp. The sets in this range are pretty low impedance and are meant to be driven by portable players. If you start looking at sets rated at about more than ~60 ohms you'll start to hear a difference with a headphone amp, in terms of dynamics. E.g, a soundcard isn't going to drive a pair of Sennheiser HD500/600/650's very well, but will drive a pair of HD202's or HD595's just fine, with an amp only improving upon dynamics, depth, and overall richness of sound. If you can find a set of Sony MDR-V6 (~$80) you'll likely enjoy the sound too, if you like tight bass for rock, hip-hop, yet their ear cushions tend to disintigrate after a couple years of use. Stay away from the Sony MDR-V600's...they're like the rice-cakes of headphones, IMO.

    Check out http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-budget/40-80/ if you have an opportunity.


    Note the sensitivity ratings on the phones as impedance is not always the best determining factor as to how a portable wold be able to drive them. The sony's are very sensitve & can be driven quite loudly by portables, enough to even annoy others in spite of bieng a closed design with somewhat highish impedance though I would avoid anything over 60-70 ohms as then you are getting into proffessional headphones that take a lot to drive them. many of this type have impedances in the 600 ohm range & are not very sensitve to boot.

    if you are willing to try ear plug type headphone then you can go as high as 100 ohmes as these are extremely sensitive once properly inserted. I have a pair of ultimate ears headphones that put even the sony's to shame & can be driven extemely loud by my creative zen extra without annoying anyone else, in fact I can't turn them up very much or it's to loud for me yet the are extemely clear throughout thier range but they are out of your stated price range at 250 dollars. note these do not work well with portables that have the volume controll at the output instead of before the final amp. virtually all nob type volume contols are out as far as portables go as they are almost always after the final amp. all digital volume controls on the other hand come before the final amp. this important on the ultimate ears as they are 2 way speakers with a crossover that is affected by the final impedance of the amp & nob type volume controls alter that impedance & the bass & treble both go away if hooked to these headphones.

    There is an ultimate ear headphone in your price range though that is not a 2-way speaker & as such does not suffer this issue but may not quite have the extreme clarity of the 250 dollar unit but should still be very very good. all ultimat ears are extemely sensitve 115-120db at 1 milliwatt!!
  19. I have $75 AKG's that I love, they have real big cans which look a bit silly at work, but when you're wearing them for hours at a time its good because they don't cramp your ears. They're pretty high impedance at 75ohms and the only time I have a problem with my ipod is when I'm on a plane, then I could use a little more volume. If you're plugging into a receiver you'll have no problem.

    I would suggest not getting bose because while they might give you more bass, they do alot of filtering and you get an artificial sound.

    Sennheiser I've never tried but I know TG recommends them and not surprisingly as a result, everyone in this forum. :wink:
  20. Yes! I was gonna reccomend them and can't believe that someone here has heard of them... (but considering the url I can't imagine why not ;) )

    I actually lived in Bozeman, MT for a while. Headroom is based there and those guys are incredible. Best bunch of ppl I have bought anything from. They really know their stuff, sell primarily phones for music (no mics on them yet that I know of) but the quality is impressive. Put plenty of stock in their ratings. When they say it is good, it is really good and you will be amazed how good they sound. If they say it sucks, well... dont get it that's for sure. ;)

    They also have a great price/performance (value) rating that is good to keep an eye on. Of course, Senheiser dominates alot of those ratings, but Koss and others creap in there as well. They are very picky on what they sell. The only reason they have "not so good" ones it that some ppl want cheapies, and so they do keep some there just as the "best of the worst" kinda thing.

    Go there for sure, headphone.com and bask in the light of those who know... lol It is the last 'phones site you will ever need.
  21. Quote:
    Yes! I was gonna reccomend them and can't believe that someone here has heard of them... (but considering the url I can't imagine why not ;) )

    I actually lived in Bozeman, MT for a while. Headroom is based there and those guys are incredible. Best bunch of ppl I have bought anything from. They really know their stuff, sell primarily phones for music (no mics on them yet that I know of) but the quality is impressive. Put plenty of stock in their ratings. When they say it is good, it is really good and you will be amazed how good they sound. If they say it sucks, well... dont get it that's for sure. ;)

    They also have a great price/performance (value) rating that is good to keep an eye on. Of course, Senheiser dominates alot of those ratings, but Koss and others creap in there as well. They are very picky on what they sell. The only reason they have "not so good" ones it that some ppl want cheapies, and so they do keep some there just as the "best of the worst" kinda thing.

    Go there for sure, headphone.com and bask in the light of those who know... lol It is the last 'phones site you will ever need.


    Amen. I'm not sure, but I think Astrallite may have pointed me to headroom a way back when I started the headphone journey. It's all a blur now, especially at my age. I've not looked back since though my wallet is still recovering. 8O I've been listening to my cans almost exclusively for the past 2 months. I can high recommend HeadRoom's Total BitHead as an economic mobile amp/DAC. @ $200 it is for the devoted but headphone amps make a difference in sound quality, IMO. The Total BitHead is a good entry into such things once one starts looking into >=$150 cans. The TBH made an audible difference in the Senn HD595's.
  22. Quote:
    Yes! I was gonna reccomend them and can't believe that someone here has heard of them... (but considering the url I can't imagine why not ;) )

    I actually lived in Bozeman, MT for a while. Headroom is based there and those guys are incredible. Best bunch of ppl I have bought anything from. They really know their stuff, sell primarily phones for music (no mics on them yet that I know of) but the quality is impressive. Put plenty of stock in their ratings. When they say it is good, it is really good and you will be amazed how good they sound. If they say it sucks, well... dont get it that's for sure. ;)

    They also have a great price/performance (value) rating that is good to keep an eye on. Of course, Senheiser dominates alot of those ratings, but Koss and others creap in there as well. They are very picky on what they sell. The only reason they have "not so good" ones it that some ppl want cheapies, and so they do keep some there just as the "best of the worst" kinda thing.

    Go there for sure, headphone.com and bask in the light of those who know... lol It is the last 'phones site you will ever need.


    Amen. I'm not sure, but I think Astrallite may have pointed me to headroom a way back when I started the headphone journey. It's all a blur now, especially at my age. I've not looked back since though my wallet is still recovering. 8O I've been listening to my cans almost exclusively for the past 2 months. I can also highly recommend HeadRoom's Total BitHead as an economic mobile amp/DAC. @ $200 it is for the devoted but headphone amps make a difference in sound quality, IMO. The Total BitHead is a good entry into such things once one starts looking into >=$150 cans. The TBH made an audible difference in the Senn HD595's.
  23. yessiree... if you want good ear-candy and dont want to rock the ppl next door (or the wife and kids ;) ) then spend the $ on a good set of cans and an amp. And buy them from headroom.

    oh, and @ the OP: you do not need to amplify the ipod unless you have 'phones that are running above the ohm spec for the ipod. If they are drawing too much then you need an amp. Most sub-$100 sets will be fine though. Ask those guys @ headroom about specific models though if you are uncertain. They know. (good ppl to talk to on the phone btw)
  24. A headphone amp does a bit more than just make up for volume loss due to high-impedance. It provides the drivers in a quality set of cans with the power for them to reach their potential. In a similar way as a good high-current amp better drives speakers than your budget Sony receiver can. The difference in sound quality, though, is something a music afficiando would appreciate...not necessarily someone playing doom. Though I like HeadRoom and have some good gear from them my personal choice for desktop headphone DAC/AMP was with the Tiawanese firm Firestone (per my sig): http://www.firestone-audio.com/cgi-bin/productsearch.asp?catseqnm=1. ...good sounding equipment for the money will full RCA inputs and full-size digital inputs. It's not gear one would necessarily use for gaming but presents music nicely. Similar HeadRoom gear would have been significantly more expensive so I had to cross the ocean.

    You can't really go wrong with HeadRoom, IMO. I've bought and returned merchandise from/to them and will definately get my AKG K701's from them.
  25. totally agree... but running an mp3 from an ipod that little bit of difference wil hardly be noticed. You would have to run lossless first. ;) Thought I would just keep it simple on his budget... but you are right and the total truth is prb better, my bad.

    and ya, I game w/ a pair of plantronics for both the speaker and mic quality. Headroom as I said does not (yet) carry mic-equipped phones. And ya, price may be a bit more, but I dont mind paying for better service w/ most things. I have a pair of senn's for my ipod that I got from them and love 'em. I went for portability w/ a sacrifice of some quality...

    rock on man.
  26. I've been nothing but chuffed with my beyerdynamic dt231s - http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-manufacturer/beyerdynamic/beyerdynamic-dt-231.php - bit silly looking but they are light and comfy and have a cracking sound. One of the best headphones for under $100 imo.
  27. I'm in the same boat but I've read that to get the most out of some of the sennheisers you need an amp. Does anyone know of a cheap amp that will work with computers? The cheapest I could find were $200 so they'd cost more than the head phones.
  28. One of the things I've been wondering is how well headphones reproduce gaming positional audio, EAX, etc. With a high-quality audio card, capable of positional audio, do sounds meant to come from behind an individual do so, convincingly, when listening via headphones. I'm not a gamer (can't get into the current genre of games, really) so I'm just wondering. I'd also be curious if the quality of headphone has bearing on how convincing headphone'd surround-sound is or is just up to the audiocard? Do $15 headphones sound pretty much the same as $100 headphones when it comes to gaming surround sound. In a way, this does indeed relate to the original question so I'm not too far off topic.
  29. on the sound card end, yes... the card does all of the work. The cans just need to reproduce clear sound. Heavy bass speakers actually hurt the sound, so the really cheap ones do kinda suck there. The $15 mark you mentioned (usually) lays the bass on too much and muddies up the sound, so ya... better 'phones give better positional stuff. It is because of the clear dynamics though...

    and the xfi is the mark to beat now on positional stuff... even w/ music it makes speakers truly have a nice soundstage. No more "middle of the head" sound point. Truely a thing to marvel at and behold. The upmix capability for mp3's is nice too, but not for everything (it can be turned off).

    hope that answered ya...
  30. The most economical headphone amp I'd recommend is $150...a HeadRoom Total AirHead (Total BitHead w/o the DAC)... http://www.headphone.com/products/headphone-amps/the-mobile-line/headroom-total-airhead.php

    My Senn HD595's sounded REALLY good when playing through the Total BitHead. Its challenging to write or articulate what the audible difference is when coming through one of these amps vs. coming straight off the sound card without sounding more dorky than I might already. Bass was really tight with little unintended resonance, mids and highs smooth...not grainy sounding. Its like the music was more clear, as if I could pick out different instruments and sounds that were masked when coming straight off the sound card. I don't know if I'd agree that all Sennheisers need an amp to sound good. ...but an amp makes a difference. If one does the majority of their music listening out of headphones then I'd recommend an amp...but not for occasional use. As has been said, you can easily spend more on an amp than on an economical set of cans.
  31. Quote:
    on the sound card end, yes... the card does all of the work. The cans just need to reproduce clear sound. Heavy bass speakers actually hurt the sound, so the really cheap ones do kinda suck there. The $15 mark you mentioned (usually) lays the bass on too much and muddies up the sound, so ya... better 'phones give better positional stuff. It is because of the clear dynamics though...

    and the xfi is the mark to beat now on positional stuff... even w/ music it makes speakers truly have a nice soundstage. No more "middle of the head" sound point. Truely a thing to marvel at and behold. The upmix capability for mp3's is nice too, but not for everything (it can be turned off).

    hope that answered ya...


    It did. Thanks a bunch.
  32. Quote:
    Hey Chase.....I know what you said LOL...you said.....and I quote "bass QUALITY, not bass QUANTITY"....and the Bose head set DOES just that. I guess I didn't explain my perception properly.

    What I really meant to say was that the Bose headset gives you a FULL rounded out sound field. ANd if you DID want a more "bassy" feel to a particular track....these ones will give it to you through the sound field selections that are available in your ipod.


    The Bose Triports lean more towards heavy bass than they do accurate bass. I think you do not know what you are talking about, or have not heard better. They only have lots of bass...but even in this regard the Triports hit their limits fairly quickly. They distort bass plenty at moderately high volume levels. Not only that, the midrange is extremely lacking, and the high end is piercing and shrill. I have owned a pair for almost a year, and they're the biggest regret I have in regards to sound equipment. They sound decent if they're the first thing you listen to after having $15 headphones, but there are much, MUCH better options out there that you can get for 1/3 of the price.

    Stop recommending Bose, people.
  33. Go sennheiser they make the absolute best headsets in the world. The pc 160 SK's are a good choice for gaming and everything else for that matter, music sounds amazing also. The 160 SK's are insanely good for cs, you will be able to wall people as long as they arent walking, because you can hear exactly where everyone is. These may not feature sorround sound, how ever they sound like they do.

    http://www.us.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=15268&vpn=PC160SK&manufacture=Sennheiser%20Electronics (usd)

    http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=15268&vpn=PC160SK&manufacture=Sennheiser%20Electronics (cad)
  34. While I truly like the Sennheisers I own, I'm not sure I'd say they're the very best...especially since I also own a swift set of mid-range GRADOs. I'd like to hear whether or not the Senn HD650's ( http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-manufacturer/sennheiser/sennheiser-hd-650.php ) sound as good with the Zu Mobius cables ( http://www.zucable.com/mobiussenn/index.html ) as many rave about.

    I was looking @ HeadRoom's site...you might be able to get a set of HD555's for around $100. That'd be pretty sweete.
  35. i will say this:

    if you want to spend $30 or less, buy SONYs, they are cheap and VERY COMFORTABLE, as well as having fairly good sound quality.

    about $30, buy sennheisers. their higher end cans are great. i would definately recomend staying away from their lower models though, specifically the hd 202s, i got them and they were very tight on the ears and had poor sound quality.

    i am now using 2 pairs, sennheiser rs 120s (wireless, for home/computer use) and a really old pair of sony mdrs ($20). the sennheisers have better audio, but they cost 80$, they are also very comfortable. i really like the open aire design even though i thought i would hate it. i have to admit though, the sonys are more comfortable, they are extremely lite and just wonderful to wear.

    if i were you, i would go with any mid-range sennheiser can. i assume concealing your audio is not a priority for you, so i would definately recomend getting an open aire design set, they are very comfortable and have great audio.
  36. Audio Technica Ath a900, requires no amp and sounds good.
  37. thanks for all the help guys.... (lots of replies!)

    i am sorry to say that my headphone funds disappeared!

    i am going to have to wait about a month more before im able to make a purchase, and i guess i might as well wait and decide then


    im going too bookmark this thread and review all of the replies once im able to buy some headphones!
  38. Sennheiser, Bose and Sony have great headphones.
  39. This is for SIBA

    I think I DO know what I talk about, and I know what I like. I am NOT saying however that the BOSE are the best.....I am merely posing a subjective opinion BASED on what I like..... AND as you can see... I did NOT use STATS or CONSUMER reviews to try and back up what YOU thought I was saying ...I believe you misunderstood me. If I led you astray it was only because you read my post, interpreted it to mean that Bose was the best, and took it as such. ......not my problem.

    I have just always liked Bose for the sound quality and gave a subjective comment based on what I liked... that;s it.. sorry you were led to believe otherwise
  40. Quote:
    This is for SIBA

    I think I DO know what I talk about, and I know what I like. I am NOT saying however that the BOSE are the best.....I am merely posing a subjective opinion BASED on what I like..... AND as you can see... I did NOT use STATS or CONSUMER reviews to try and back up what YOU thought I was saying ...I believe you misunderstood me. If I led you astray it was only because you read my post, interpreted it to mean that Bose was the best, and took it as such. ......not my problem.

    I have just always liked Bose for the sound quality and gave a subjective comment based on what I liked... that;s it.. sorry you were led to believe otherwise


    There's nothing "wrong" with BOSE equipment. BOSE equipment simply colours the sound in a manner that BOSE research have found that their test subjects like. It's a popular type of sound with accentuated bass and treble, and many like that sound. Some are purists and can't stand the thought of their sound being equalized without them doing it themselves. If you like the way BOSE equipment sounds that's fine, as you're spending noone's money but your own. Can you do better for less? Surely, if you shop around and know what to look for. BOSE equipment is fun sounding, but not accurate, by any stretch. ...neither are those mini-bookshelf stereos that are so popular. As long as you know this about BOSE, enjoy their products. They're fun, IMO. ...as far as their headphones, though, its far too easy to do much better for less money. There's little reason, IMO, to purchase BOSE headphones when you can get better sounding Sennheisers, GRADO, and AKG sets...you just can't run down to your local Circuit City or Tweeter and get them. ...for a lot of people that fact is important.
  41. Thank you Halcyon, apparently there are some people who think otherwise.
  42. Quote:
    This is for SIBA

    I think I DO know what I talk about, and I know what I like. I am NOT saying however that the BOSE are the best.....I am merely posing a subjective opinion BASED on what I like..... AND as you can see... I did NOT use STATS or CONSUMER reviews to try and back up what YOU thought I was saying ...I believe you misunderstood me. If I led you astray it was only because you read my post, interpreted it to mean that Bose was the best, and took it as such. ......not my problem.

    I have just always liked Bose for the sound quality and gave a subjective comment based on what I liked... that;s it.. sorry you were led to believe otherwise


    There's nothing "wrong" with BOSE equipment. BOSE equipment simply colours the sound in a manner that BOSE research have found that their test subjects like. It's a popular type of sound with accentuated bass and treble, and many like that sound. Some are purists and can't stand the thought of their sound being equalized without them doing it themselves. If you like the way BOSE equipment sounds that's fine, as you're spending noone's money but your own. Can you do better for less? Surely, if you shop around and know what to look for. BOSE equipment is fun sounding, but not accurate, by any stretch. ...neither are those mini-bookshelf stereos that are so popular. As long as you know this about BOSE, enjoy their products. They're fun, IMO. ...as far as their headphones, though, its far too easy to do much better for less money. There's little reason, IMO, to purchase BOSE headphones when you can get better sounding Sennheisers, GRADO, and AKG sets...you just can't run down to your local Circuit City or Tweeter and get them. ...for a lot of people that fact is important.

    I was providing feedback based on my experiences. I own a pair of the Bose Triports, and the OP asked about headphones. The simple fact of the matter is, as you've said yourself...there are much better options out there for the money. I also recall urging the OP to listen to headphones for themselves if possible to see which ones they preferred.

    As for your statement about nothing being wrong with Bose equipment, that's also your opinion, which you are entitled to. As for my own experience, the triports I currently have in my posession are not the original, they were replaced by Bose because the originals had flimsy construction and the plastic clips that held the earpieces onto the band snapped off through regular, careful use. Again, my own experience, not based on online reviews or stats pulled from some website. They were replaced through warranty and the replacements were revised so that the headband is no longer as flimsy.

    I don't really mind that you guys are flaming me to hell about being so against the OP buying the triports, but try to understand that I have my own reasons gathered from personal experience using the triports for the better part of a year. After buying the 7506s and doing side by side comparisons, the bass response (which the OP had as one of the features he was looking for) was muddy on the triports compared to the sonys, which had crisp bass. The triports bass extension is also somewhat lacking, with the deeper frequencies causing them to distort noticeably.


    Quote:
    BOSE equipment is fun sounding, but not accurate, by any stretch. ...neither are those mini-bookshelf stereos that are so popular. As long as you know this about BOSE, enjoy their products.


    That's what I'm trying to prevent here. The main problem I see is...many people just aren't informed enough about audio products to make a good decision. They are buying a product based on which company has the biggest advertising budget, not based on the quality of the products. I agree with you that Bose equipment can sound fun. This was not my point in arguing against the triports. The OP asked for clean bass, and did not specify a need for earthshaking levels of bass. I simply stated that the triports did not have clean, accurate bass. They have lots of bass. The way I see it, in the context of the OP's request, anyone that is recommending the triports isn't making a good suggestion. That's my opinion, from my personal experience.
  43. I actually dislike people who buy poor speaker equipment and then encourage other people to buy them "because it has 500W of RMS goodness OMFG and that means good sound quality."

    At some point I realized this was a pointless crusade. Either they are going remain in their happiness is bliss world, or figure out for themselves what they are missing, and realize that claiming anyone who has better equipment is an audiophile is about as acceptable of an argument as a Honda Civic owners whove never driven anything else in their life to call anyone who has a better car as "only snobby carphile would want more."

    It's one thing (and perfectly acceptable) to claim "it's not for me, I tried", while it's totally different claiming "what I have is best, I don't need any evidence" while shopping at Walmart or McDonalds.

    Then again, this is THG forums, where the average age is double digit challenged. Crusades like this are like that of a basketball coach in South Cental trying to convince his Junior High Squad that they are losing because all they do is dunk and they can't hit a jumpshot to save their life. ("What the hell does coach know??)
  44. Siba, you know I agree with you, and I have not and will not ever, "flame" anyone. That's for kids, of which I am not. ...and I'm far too ignorant about too many things to become arrogant. I simply don't dislike Bose equipment with the passion that some others express. To me, it's "okay", I just wouldn't recommend it. As for as the OP and clean bass? I'd recommend the GRADO SR80 or SR125. The SR125 cost the same amount as the Bose Triports but are a way better headphone, IMO. I had a pair of the Triports (the ones with the corrected headband). I liked them okay and Astrallite and others educated me on reality and got me interested in better gear. The Bose can't really compete very well with my current choices, its a different class of gear.
  45. So what is this Grado headset you guys are mentioning? I live in Canada and I have never seen this set. Is it only available in the US?
    or the UK...Lemme know and I'll check em out.
  46. Quote:
    ...and I'm far too ignorant about too many things to become arrogant.


    ahh... If only more ppl realized this about themselves the world (and this forum) would be so much better. :!:

    I also am too ignorant and with far too many things become arrogant... wait, that did not come out right at all! :oops:
  47. Quote:
    So what is this Grado headset you guys are mentioning? I live in Canada and I have never seen this set. Is it only available in the US?
    or the UK...Lemme know and I'll check em out.


    Well, if you can spend $150 I'd recommended the Grado SR125, but I've read that for $200 the Grado SR225 is a significant improvement over the Grado SR125, with better mids and smoother treble response. For more information check HeadRoom.Com ( http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-manufacturer/grado/ ). However, sticking to a more economical price of ~$100 the Grado SR 80's are nice. The Grado headphones are not as neutral as some others, and depending on your preferences, that may be a big deal. Grado's tend to offer a crisper treble response with more upfront & tight bass. Many that like rock, rap, techno, trance, might love the way Grado's make music sound, while if you're listening to orchestral music, their response might be fatiguing over time. That's a summary of what I tend to read about the Grados. I love the way they sound compared to my Sennheiser HD595's. The Grados really makes listening to music engaging and fun...to me.
  48. Quote:
    Siba, you know I agree with you, and I have not and will not ever, "flame" anyone. That's for kids, of which I am not. ...and I'm far too ignorant about too many things to become arrogant.


    Alright, sorry I came across that way. I tend to get a bit zealous when trying to show others their errors. :)

    Quote:
    I simply don't dislike Bose equipment with the passion that some others express. To me, it's "okay", I just wouldn't recommend it.


    That's your opinion, which you are entitled to. I'm only anti-Bose to this extent because its my opinion that there are almost(if any) no products Bose offers that isn't either a) a marketing gimmick or b) one of the worst choices to swing for at the price level. I've listened to their demo units etc at the Bose stores...after hearing better quality equipment, the Bose products don't really come close to anything in their price range, or even below their price range. It just really gets to me that this sort of marketing works so well. I almost wish I had thought of it myself. The secret to becoming rich beyond belief - create a product in a market where 95% of the consumers are entirely uneducated about what they're buying. Another thing to consider is...there is a certain level of training and/or experience that is sometimes required to hear the differences in the sound. Those two things combined make it easy to sell mediocre products at unheard of premiums.

    Quote:
    I had a pair of the Triports (the ones with the corrected headband). I liked them okay and Astrallite and others educated me on reality and got me interested in better gear. The Bose can't really compete very well with my current choices, its a different class of gear.


    I went through the same kind of epiphany. The way you put it couldn't have been said better.

    Quote:
    I actually dislike people who buy poor speaker equipment and then encourage other people to buy them "because it has 500W of RMS goodness OMFG and that means good sound quality."

    At some point I realized this was a pointless crusade.


    Gotta start somewhere, I suppose. I'm theorizing that if I can "show the light" to just one person, they'll in turn do the same to others when confronted with the same situation. Hopefully it'll help loosen Bose' monopoly on the high end consumer audio market, and we'll actually get better options to listen to in retail stores like Best Buy, etc. Pipe dream, I know...but even if it doesn't work, if I can make just one person happy with a good reason to be happy, it's worth it to me.

    Quote:
    It's one thing (and perfectly acceptable) to claim "it's not for me, I tried", while it's totally different claiming "what I have is best, I don't need any evidence" while shopping at Walmart or McDonalds.


    That's exactly the problem with the audio market today, and it's also exactly the type of ignorance that works to benefit the marketing style employed by Bose. I can't agree with you more.
  49. I would recommend Sennheiser HD 280's (~$85 @ newegg). They have great sound for the price, are circumaural, closed, and fold up. They're very versatile and I speak from experience as a sound engineer (FOH). Also, they'll treat you nicely (I had to RMA a product) For long trips like on planes, Ultimate Ears super.fi 3s really fit the bill (<$100; look on froogle); excellent sound quality and IEMs really block out the sound. If not these two, go to Headroom (headphone.com) and they'll have pages of recommendations and you'll even be able to talk to someone who'll love to help you out :) .

    Using an amplifier will help improve sound quality no matter what and especially will when using higher impedence.. (talk to headroom for more info).

    And please, don't use MP3 format!!! It SUCKS. The only reason why it's so popular was because of a demand for a standard audio format without too much concern for sound quality. If your using an iPod, use AAC @160 or higher or even lossless.
Ask a new question

Read More

Sound Cards Headphones Components