Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server (
More info?)
The following is the exact event I'm getting...
Event Type: Error
Event Source: EventLog
Event Category: None
Event ID: 6004
Date: 9/15/2004
Time: 14:14:17
User: N/A
Computer: TRMSRV01
Description:
A driver packet received from the I/O subsystem was
invalid. The data is the packet.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Data:
0000: 0c 00 e0 00 0e 00 00 00 ..à.....
0008: de ee 33 d0 4f 9b c4 01 Þî3ÐOÄ.
0010: 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 @.......
0018: 00 00 00 00 04 00 4e 00 ......N.
0020: 00 00 00 00 cb 0b 00 80 ....Ë..
0028: 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 c0 .......À
0030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
0038: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
0040: 4d 00 52 00 78 00 53 00 M.R.x.S.
0048: 6d 00 62 00 00 00 5c 00 m.b...\.
0050: 44 00 65 00 76 00 69 00 D.e.v.i.
0058: 63 00 65 00 5c 00 4c 00 c.e.\.L.
0060: 61 00 6e 00 6d 00 61 00 a.n.m.a.
0068: 6e 00 52 00 65 00 64 00 n.R.e.d.
0070: 69 00 72 00 65 00 63 00 i.r.e.c.
0078: 74 00 6f 00 72 00 00 00 t.o.r...
0080: 42 00 46 00 2d 00 4c 00 B.F.-.L.
0088: 4f 00 52 00 45 00 4e 00 O.R.E.N.
0090: 5a 00 45 00 54 00 54 00 Z.E.T.T.
0098: 49 00 00 00 4e 00 65 00 I...N.e.
00a0: 74 00 42 00 54 00 5f 00 t.B.T._.
00a8: 54 00 63 00 70 00 69 00 T.c.p.i.
00b0: 70 00 5f 00 7b 00 42 00 p._.{.B.
00b8: 37 00 43 00 39 00 36 00 7.C.9.6.
00c0: 30 00 45 00 32 00 2d 00 0.E.2.-.
00c8: 37 00 42 00 33 00 42 00 7.B.3.B.
00d0: 2d 00 34 00 35 00 43 00 -.4.5.C.
00d8: 34 00 2d 00 39 00 00 00 4.-.9...
Martin B.
>-----Original Message-----
>Forgot to ask if your using unicast or multicast
>rgds
>Steve
>
>"Steve" <s.simpson_no1spam@btopenworld.com> wrote in
message
>news:cid1q0$kvc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>> Hi Martin
>> Just because the servers are new does not mean they
wont/don't have a
>fault
>> don't dismiss it its possible ..
>> I have seen them flaky out of the box from day 1
>>
>> Okay I was just thinking that as the error was the
same it may have given
>> you a clue
>> if anyone had given the servers Locally administered
addresses (LAA) or
>> universally administered addresses (UAA) in the
advance settings on the
>> nic's..
>> I know it refers to Token Ring in the article but the
fact that some OEM
>> Ethernet drivers allow the same functionality I was
wondering if the
>setting
>> of the servers had been accidentally configured at
some time (Proset
>allows
>> you to do this on the Intel server pro adapter) and
the Macs were in
>> conflict
>>
>> Questions
>> Does the Mac data in the error log match the Mac
address of the nic?
>> what is the data shown in the event log ?
>> Are you running Auto Negotiate on the nics and
switches. this can cause
>> issues.
>> what happens if you drop the speed of the nics at all,
does the error
>still
>> appear
>> You got any software broadcasting that could cause
this error
>> Are your bindings set up correctly (open network
connections select
>advance
>> advance settings)
>>
>> The servers each have a dual port Intel pro/1000
gigabit card you say are
>> they on the motherboard?
>> did you get OEM drivers at the vendors site or did you
get them from Intel
>?
>> Are they sharing any irq's for the 2 ports at all? are
the settings on all
>> of the affected servers at the bios level the same ?
>> Have you checked for known issues for the hardware
platform (I am assuming
>> they are all the same) on the vendor forums ?
>> Is the server bios, firmware, etc all up to date ?
>>
>> Are the network cables new?
>>
>> Are you teaming the 2 ports at all using teaming
software ? if you are
>have
>> you got any reported errors for the nic in the
teaming software ?
>>
>> have you got a pci server nic in the servers
>> what happens if you run the network interface via a
pci nic. do you get
>the
>> error still.
>>
>> Install the network monitor driver on the servers and
capture the packets
>> using netmon and see what your getting from the wire
you can do address
>> pairs to capture between the server and one of the
other servers and
>review
>> the captures
>> this may help if you need help with netmon post back..
>>
>> hth
>> rgds
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:18d401c49c24$bb886390$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> > This article seems to apply to Windows NT 3.5 and
4.0 but
>> > I did look in to it anyways but I did not have that
>> > problem the article is mentionning about LAA or UAA.
I
>> > had the same issue with an older driver. The nics are
>> > brand new in all 8 servers.
>> >
>> > Thanks for you help
>> >
>> > >-----Original Message-----
>> > >http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?
scid=kb;en-
>> > us;Q171332
>> > >
>> > >May help
>> > >
>> > >Could be the network cards are faulty or the driver
is
>> > causing the problem
>> > >if the Q article does not help
>> > >
>> > >have you an earlier drive you can try on a server ?
>> > >
>> > >rgds
>> > >Steve
>> > >
>> > >"Martin B." <mboudreau@lgit.com> wrote in message
>> > >news:152101c49bf6$a0779c70$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> > >> I'm getting Event ID 6004 (A driver packet
received
>> > from
>> > >> the I/O subsystem was invalid. The data is the
packet.)
>> > >> in my System Log every minute or so on all my
Windows
>> > >> 2000 (Advanced Server) servers (8 servers) with
>> > Terminal
>> > >> server installed in application mode and in load
>> > >> balancing. The servers each have a dual port intel
>> > >> pro/1000 gigabit card also configured for load
>> > balancing
>> > >> running the latest drivers from Intel. If more
info is
>> > >> needed let me know.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >.
>> > >
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>