Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)
Is that a bad idea to connect a firewall, a DMZ network
(192.168.2.0/24) and a private network (192.168.1.0/24)
to a switch.
The swith can do VLAN based on any combination
of MAC, IP address, IP subnet and port number.
It can also support Spanning Tree Protocol.
If it is not a bad idea, what combination should I use?
I am prefer to use IP subnet for easy management: no more
remembering the right port numbers or entering MAC or IP
addresses.
TIA,
--
Zoong PHAM UNIX Systems Administrator
Mercy Health and Aged Care Inc. Melbourne - Australia
zpham@mercy_dot_com_dot_au +61 - 3 - 84167747
PGP public key is available on request
Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)
On 7 May 2004 05:36:12 GMT, Zoong Pham <dpham@mercy_dot_com.au> wrote:
>Is that a bad idea to connect a firewall, a DMZ network
>(192.168.2.0/24) and a private network (192.168.1.0/24)
>to a switch.
>The swith can do VLAN based on any combination
>of MAC, IP address, IP subnet and port number.
>It can also support Spanning Tree Protocol.
Relying on VLANs to act as firewalls is generally accepted to be a bad
idea. There have been VLAN hopping vulnerabilities in the past
whereby it has been possible to use various tricks to hop between
VLANs on certain switches. There haven't been any such
vulnerabilities recently (AFAIK), but nonetheless... If separation
between the DMZ and private network is important to you from a
security standpoint, use two switches.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.