OSPF Query

Forum General Networking : Network General Discussions - OSPF Query

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)

 

Not sure if this is the right newsgroup, but here goes.

Have a small network, only five routers all running OSPF in a single area. Two
of the routers are connected via WAN links that have aggregate speeds of about
45 Mbit/s.

The problem I have is that during very heavy traffic periods, we loose the
remote routers and we cannot recover them unless we bring the links completey
down and then re-open them. Ran Etherreal going into the WAN links and have
seen the traffic hitting 45Mbit/s. I have confirmed this also by performing
very large "pings" 64K bytes and the links go down straight away.

I have checked using "show ospf" commands that the routes learned across the
WAN links have gone.

What I don't understand is that if I physically disconnect the WAN links we
obviously loose the remote sites, but if I restore them everything comes back
after a few moments. It is only during the very high traffic "peaks" that we
loose the links completely.

Has anybody seen or had any similar problems, Cisco Tech Support were baffled
as well.


Regards

Nicki

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)

 

NICKTTI <nicktti@aol.com> wrote:
> Not sure if this is the right newsgroup, but here goes.

> Have a small network, only five routers all running OSPF in a single area. Two
> of the routers are connected via WAN links that have aggregate speeds of about
> 45 Mbit/s.

> The problem I have is that during very heavy traffic periods, we loose the
> remote routers and we cannot recover them unless we bring the links completey
> down and then re-open them. Ran Etherreal going into the WAN links and have
> seen the traffic hitting 45Mbit/s. I have confirmed this also by performing
> very large "pings" 64K bytes and the links go down straight away.

> I have checked using "show ospf" commands that the routes learned across the
> WAN links have gone.

> What I don't understand is that if I physically disconnect the WAN links we
> obviously loose the remote sites, but if I restore them everything comes back
> after a few moments. It is only during the very high traffic "peaks" that we
> loose the links completely.

> Has anybody seen or had any similar problems, Cisco Tech Support were baffled
> as well.

If you are "overutilizing" the links via UDP and or icmp packets the packet
drop might be too high, dropping too many ispf-hello packets. Remember that
non-flowcontrol traffic could kill almost anything. Increasing
router buffers is most likley the worst thing to do.

Things to try :
Reduce buffers available to normal traffic, prioritize OSPF or create
static routes across the WAN links. Switch to EIGRP if possible.


> Regards

> Nicki





>

--
Peter HÃ¥kanson
IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet (More info?)

 

> NICKTTI <nicktti@aol.com> wrote:
> > Not sure if this is the right newsgroup, but here goes.

It's not. comp.dcom.sys.cisco is better.

[snip]
> > after a few moments. It is only during the very high traffic "peaks" that we
> > loose the links completely.
> > Has anybody seen or had any similar problems, Cisco Tech Support were baffled
> > as well.

You're dropping OSPF hello's because they are being washed out in the noise.
What type of queuing do you have?


In article <ca4ln1$1b2n$6@nyheter.ipsec.se>, phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
says...
> Things to try :
> Reduce buffers available to normal traffic, prioritize OSPF or create
> static routes across the WAN links. Switch to EIGRP if possible.

I don't see how moving to EIGRP would help. It's hello's would time out
just as well.


--

hsb

"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding" Calvin
*************** USE ROT13 TO SEE MY EMAIL ADDRESS ****************
********************************************************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account. Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > General Networking > Network General Discussions > OSPF Query
Go to:

There are 562 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them