Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (
More info?)
Ace,
I'm looking at moving the mail gateway to the DMZ after
the migration is complete. I'm trying to keep the
migration simple and complete it first before I redo the
mail topology again. I realize moving the gateway to the
DMZ will then display the proper address from the DMZ in
the header.
Thank you for your reply
-Rp-
>-----Original Message-----
>In news:1cb4601c45329$e8d2f340$a301280a@phx.gbl,
>Rp <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> posted their
thoughts, then I
>offered mine
>> I setup a new mx record on my DMZ DNS server and it
points
>> to my new gateway server on the internal network. Mail
is
>> delivered with no problems however I noticed that on
>> header information of the message it shows the actual IP
>> address on the internal network not the NAT in the dmz.
>> Can someone explain how to have the NAT address put into
>> the header not the real internal address.
>>
>> Thx
>> -Rp-
>
>Kind of confused here. You want a NAT private IP instead
of a Real public IP
>on the header? Or are you just calling the external WAN
IP the NAT IP?
>
>This is somewhat not possible since if I got what you;re
saying correct,
>that your Exchange (or whatever mail server you have) is
on an internal
>private NAT IP. It's recommended to usually put a mail
server in a DMZ with
>a public (real) IP and not a NAT. Otherwise the mail
server will send out
>from itself and will use the private NAT IP that is in
its IP properties.
>
>
>--
>Regards,
>Ace
>
>Please direct all replies to the newsgroup so all can
benefit.
>This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and
confers no
>rights.
>
>Ace Fekay, MCSE 2000, MCSE+I, MCSA, MCT, MVP
>Microsoft Windows MVP - Active Directory
>
>HAM AND EGGS: A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime
commitment for a
>pig. --
>=================================
>
>
>.
>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram