Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Windows 2000 workstations registering (same as parent ford..

Tags:
  • Windows 2000
  • Workstations
  • DNS
  • Windows
Last response: in Windows 2000/NT
Share
Anonymous
August 17, 2004 2:24:11 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

I have a problem where a few random Windows 2000 workstations
occasionally register a blank or '(same as parent folder)' DNS record.

I know that domain controllers are supposed to register these records,
but these are seemingly ordinary workstations.

Does anyone know if this is caused by a configuration error on the
workstations or bug in 2000 Professional. I would also be interested
on any server workarounds for this problem. I'm not using secure
dynamic updates, but don't think it would help anyway, since these
workstations are part of the domain and are therefore trusted to
register DNS records.

-EB

More about : windows 2000 workstations registering parent ford

Anonymous
August 17, 2004 12:12:26 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

In news:ut42i093ns83gr88nnj44k7mbpos83agn4@4ax.com,
Erik B <eb@nospam.tdc.dk> wrote their comments
Then Kevin replied below:
> I have a problem where a few random Windows 2000
> workstations occasionally register a blank or '(same as
> parent folder)' DNS record.
>
> I know that domain controllers are supposed to register
> these records, but these are seemingly ordinary
> workstations.
>
> Does anyone know if this is caused by a configuration
> error on the workstations or bug in 2000 Professional. I
> would also be interested on any server workarounds for
> this problem. I'm not using secure dynamic updates, but
> don't think it would help anyway, since these
> workstations are part of the domain and are therefore
> trusted to register DNS records.
>
> -EB

I have heard of this happening several times, I could never find the root
cause, but the blank records are Netlogon registrations. If you delete the
record and the workstations continue creating them, check the client
workstations for netlogon.dns and netlogon.dnb files in the
%systemroot%\system32\config directory. Only DCs should have these files and
make Netlogon registrations.
So, if you have workstations with these files delete them, I've not yet had
a workstation recreate the netlogon.dns and netlogon.dnb files after they
were deleted, which is one reason why I haven't found the root cause.

--
Best regards,
Kevin D4 Dad Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps
================================================
--
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
================================================
http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
================================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and more
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
================================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:
http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
================================================
Anonymous
September 3, 2004 9:40:56 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (More info?)

Erik B wrote:
> *I have a problem where a few random Windows 2000 workstations
> occasionally register a blank or '(same as parent folder)' DNS
> record.
>
> I know that domain controllers are supposed to register these
> records,
> but these are seemingly ordinary workstations.
>
> Does anyone know if this is caused by a configuration error on the
> workstations or bug in 2000 Professional. I would also be interested
> on any server workarounds for this problem. I'm not using secure
> dynamic updates, but don't think it would help anyway, since these
> workstations are part of the domain and are therefore trusted to
> register DNS records.
>
> -EB *



--
zrgm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via http://www.mcse.ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://www.mcse.ms/message961989.html
!