It doesn't really improve performance though, right?
Why the heck don't they make a physics processor right now? I'd rather see crap fly around and bullets bouncing off of armor plating rather than just see the individual pores on a CGI character's face! Anyone agree or am I just noobing?
It doesn't really improve performance though, right?
Why the heck don't they make a physics processor right now? I'd rather see crap fly around and bullets bouncing off of armor plating rather than just see the individual pores on a CGI character's face! Anyone agree or am I just noobing?
I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Physics and graphics, although dependent on each other for gaming, are both necessary to play any 3d games. For any halfway graphic intensive game you will also need an add in graphics card with a decent chipset (onboard graphics just don't cut it and take up more of the cpu). Without a decent card you'll have a less enjoyable experience if you can even run the game.
There actually is a physics processor from ageia available for gaming, however you still need a decent video card to make use of it and as it costs around $300 and is only compatible with a few games, it's not something I'd ever buy as physics calculations are already currently handled well enough by the cpu and video card. So to answer your question, yes, video cards improve performance.
It doesn't really improve performance though, right?
Why the heck don't they make a physics processor right now? I'd rather see crap fly around and bullets bouncing off of armor plating rather than just see the individual pores on a CGI character's face! Anyone agree or am I just noobing?
Graphics cards definately help performance.Provided you have a decent one.now i mean anything from the mid to mid-high range of course.Although the lower end cards are ok,they simply don't have the stuff needed to kick butt.Hope that answers you some.
Dahak
EVGA NF4 SLI MB
X2 4400+@2.4
2 7800GT'S IN SLI
2X1GIG DDR400 RAM IN DC MODE
520WATT PSU
EXTREME 19IN.CRT MONITOR
3DMARK05 11533
It doesn't really improve performance though, right?
Why the heck don't they make a physics processor right now? I'd rather see crap fly around and bullets bouncing off of armor plating rather than just see the individual pores on a CGI character's face! Anyone agree or am I just noobing?
I presume you are just trolling. Hard to believe that anyone would really think this. In case you really do, what do you think benchmarks do? They measure the performance of different video cards. And yes, different video cards get higher and lower scores in the benchmarks, indicating that they do perform differently. In fact, not only do video cards enable more detail in terms of number of polygons so that the effects you talk about can be displayed, but they also do geometry processing that offloads the CPU, so the CPU can do more complicated physics.
It doesn't really improve performance though, right?
Why the heck don't they make a physics processor right now? I'd rather see crap fly around and bullets bouncing off of armor plating rather than just see the individual pores on a CGI character's face! Anyone agree or am I just noobing?
I'm unsure as to what, exactly, you're trying to get here. If you knew how most people would respond, then you're clearly trolling. However, some of the responses seem more akin to this flying right over their heads, so I can't be sure. *shrug*
At any rate, If you're trying to make a point on why GPUs have a lot of validity, whilst PPUs don't, you make a good point... but one which only a small number of people seem to get; even hardware enthusiasts can be confused.
And if you were trying to make a point in favor of the PPU... Sorry, then the other responses are pretty much 100% applicable.
It doesn't really improve performance though, right?
Why the heck don't they make a physics processor right now? I'd rather see crap fly around and bullets bouncing off of armor plating rather than just see the individual pores on a CGI character's face! Anyone agree or am I just noobing?
I'm unsure as to what, exactly, you're trying to get here. If you knew how most people would respond, then you're clearly trolling. However, some of the responses seem more akin to this flying right over their heads, so I can't be sure. *shrug*
At any rate, If you're trying to make a point on why GPUs have a lot of validity, whilst PPUs don't, you make a good point... but one which only a small number of people seem to get; even hardware enthusiasts can be confused.
And if you were trying to make a point in favor of the PPU... Sorry, then the other responses are pretty much 100% applicable.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.