$48 above the retail price? Wow.
The point was that the 5000+ is FASTER THAN 965 in nearly EVERY benchmark, but you don't compare Core 2 to that so STFU!!!!!
The thing is $500 more and slower.
No indignation about dropping that price, though. Even the FX62 which REALLY slaps EE around has dropped in price. Intel is ripping people (Excuse me, I mean idiot "cling-ons" ) off by not dropping that price.
Anyone willing to drop a grand on a 965 will get
EXACTLY what they deserve! And anyone willing to drop $600 on a 5000+ will be walking down the same road. The 6700 is the price point comp for the 5000+ and we know there is no comparison.
ocmapring both at the same price at Newegg shows that you save an immediate $100+ on the SLI mobo with 5000+ and you are assured of an upgrade path to the non-native quad which may come aound in the AM3 socket along with any K8L or BullDozer derivatives for desktop.
There is no guarantee that Kentsfield will work in the mobo you buy now and once you can get sufficient average frame rates WITH SLI, it doesn't matter. The water cooling craze brought about will only benefit AMD as people like freecableguy had world records with FX long before Core 2.
Imagine if Dell did release a special edition 5000+ with the PresHott water cooling system at 3.7GHz. Then when 4x4 comes around there will be a 3.0GHz AM2 at 65nm.
The undervolt test of the 4200+ shows that @ 65nm AMD can run around 1V up to 2.8GHz.
Wow did that go off topic sort of.