Conflicting reviews at PCMag and PCWorld

[Arkanis]

Both these reviews conflict so much it's unbelievable. PCWorld puts the viewsonic at the top, but PCMag puts it closer to the bottom. PCMag puts the Dell FP1702 (or something) much higher than PCWorld who puts it at the bottom. PCWorld says the viewing angles are great with the Planar PV174 (which I can attest to...i own one), while PCMag says it is one of the poorest. What do you think of this disparity in opinion?

 

[SDLeMire]

That quality is somewhat subjective, and no two monitors are exactly alike, same model or not.

 

[flamethrower205]

one gets paid by companies and the other doesn't I think it may just be the different equipment used, or wierd stuff. PCworld hs an accurate review of the TFT7020 though.

Sig of the week.

 

[AMD_Man]

I generally find PC World reviews to be more objective and accurate than PC Magazine.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor