Both these reviews conflict so much it's unbelievable. PCWorld puts the viewsonic at the top, but PCMag puts it closer to the bottom. PCMag puts the Dell FP1702 (or something) much higher than PCWorld who puts it at the bottom. PCWorld says the viewing angles are great with the Planar PV174 (which I can attest to...i own one), while PCMag says it is one of the poorest. What do you think of this disparity in opinion?
one gets paid by companies and the other doesn't I think it may just be the different equipment used, or wierd stuff. PCworld hs an accurate review of the TFT7020 though.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.